Re: Xlog and Hamlib-4

2020-12-13 Thread Barry Jackson

On 27/11/2020 02:40, Andy Stewart wrote:

On 11/26/20 6:36 PM, Barry Jackson wrote:

On 31/10/2020 02:55, Andy Stewart wrote:


HI Barry,


--

Let me know if you continue to have issues.


Hi Andy,
OK I finally found time to have another look at this.

I started by rebuilding against a recent hamlib snapshot.


Hi Barry,

I need very specific details in order to attempt to reproduce this problem.

* if the xlog version is not 2.0.19, please try again with that version, 
which is the latest


* Exact version of hamlib (ideally, the link from where you downloaded it)

* Exact type and version of Linux

* If you did any custom configuration when you compiled hamlib and/or 
xlog, I'll need those instructions as well


* I don't have a TS-405S, so I may not be able to reproduce the problem, 
but I will try.


Thanks, and 73,

Andy



Hi Andy,
I have tried to reply to you 4 times now and am about to give up. Mail 
is just rejected.

Latest was returned today after 8 days of attempts.
I am sending this as a final test.
Do you have another mail account?
Cheers,
Barry




Re: Xlog and Hamlib-4

2020-12-01 Thread Barry Jackson
With 2003 (TS-450S correct code) in the config file all is working fine, 
except for "2002" shown in the Hamlib settings dialogue and the crash on 
hitting the 'Select a Radio' button.


Here is the tail of strace after hitting the Settings > Preferences > 
Hamlib > Select a Radio Button.


poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}, {fd=4, events=POLLIN}, {fd=6, 
events=POLLIN}], 3, 0) = 0 (Timeout)

getpid()= 1811321
getpid()= 1811321
getpid()= 1811321
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN|POLLOUT}], 1, -1) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLOUT}])
writev(3, 
[{iov_base="\24\0\6\0\236\5\240\2\321\1\0\0\6\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\377\377\377\377", 
iov_len=24}, {iov_base=NULL, iov_len=0}, {iov_base="", iov_len=0}], 3) = 24

poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, -1)= 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
recvmsg(3, {msg_name=NULL, msg_namelen=0, msg_iov=[{iov_base="\1 
:3\1\0\0\0\6\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 
iov_len=4096}], msg_iovlen=1, msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 36

poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN|POLLOUT}], 1, -1) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLOUT}])
writev(3, [{iov_base="\16\0\2\0\236\5\240\2", iov_len=8}, 
{iov_base=NULL, iov_len=0}, {iov_base="", iov_len=0}], 3) = 8

poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, -1)= 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
recvmsg(3, {msg_name=NULL, msg_namelen=0, 
msg_iov=[{iov_base="\1\30;3\0\0\0\0006\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\330\1b\2\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 
iov_len=4096}], msg_iovlen=1, msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 32

poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN|POLLOUT}], 1, -1) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLOUT}])
writev(3, [{iov_base="(\0\4\0\236\5\240\0026\1\0\0\0\0\0\0", 
iov_len=16}, {iov_base=NULL, iov_len=0}, {iov_base="", iov_len=0}], 3) = 16

poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, -1)= 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
recvmsg(3, {msg_name=NULL, msg_namelen=0, 
msg_iov=[{iov_base="\1\1<3\0\0\0\0\316\271*\1\230\1\351\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 
iov_len=4096}], msg_iovlen=1, msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 32

poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN|POLLOUT}], 1, -1) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLOUT}])
writev(3, [{iov_base="(\0\4\0\236\5\240\0026\1\0\0\0\0\0\0", 
iov_len=16}, {iov_base=NULL, iov_len=0}, {iov_base="", iov_len=0}], 3) = 16

poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, -1)= 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
recvmsg(3, {msg_name=NULL, msg_namelen=0, 
msg_iov=[{iov_base="\1\1=3\0\0\0\0\316\271*\1\230\1\351\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 
iov_len=4096}], msg_iovlen=1, msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 32

getpid()= 1811321
getpid()= 1811321
getpid()= 1811321
write(12, "W", 1)   = 1
write(12, "W", 1)   = 1
futex(0x1876290, FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI_PRIVATE) = 0
futex(0x1876290, FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI_PRIVATE) = 0
fcntl(16, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_RDLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=360, 
l_len=1}) = 0

pread64(16, "\0\0\0\0", 4, 44)  = 4
pread64(16, "\214-\0\0", 4, 364)= 4
pread64(16, "`\32\0\0D\0\0\0.\0\0\0\4\0\0\0\30\260\r\23\231\31\1&", 24, 
11660) = 24

pread64(16, "freedesktop\0button-pressed\0en_GB"..., 46, 11684) = 46
pread64(16, "\7\354\262_", 4, 11730)= 4
fcntl(16, F_SETLKW, {l_type=F_UNLCK, l_whence=SEEK_SET, l_start=360, 
l_len=1}) = 0
recvmsg(3, {msg_namelen=0}, 0)  = -1 EAGAIN (Resource 
temporarily unavailable)
recvmsg(3, {msg_namelen=0}, 0)  = -1 EAGAIN (Resource 
temporarily unavailable)
poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}, {fd=4, events=POLLIN}, {fd=6, 
events=POLLIN}], 3, 490) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
recvmsg(3, {msg_name=NULL, msg_namelen=0, 
msg_iov=[{iov_base="\5\1=3|\2569\0026\1\0\0\236\5\240\2\0\0\0\0\323\2K\1;\1b\0\0\1\1\0", 
iov_len=4096}], msg_iovlen=1, msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 32
recvmsg(3, {msg_namelen=0}, 0)  = -1 EAGAIN (Resource 
temporarily unavailable)
recvmsg(3, {msg_namelen=0}, 0)  = -1 EAGAIN 
(Resou/usr/share/themes/Adwaita/gtk-2.0/assets/button-active.png/usr/share/themes/Adwaita/gtk-2.0/assets/button-active.pngrce 
temporarily unavailable)

poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN|POLLOUT}], 1, -1) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLOUT}])
writev(3, [{iov_base="$\0\1\0&\5\2\0006\1\0\0", iov_len=12}, 
{iov_base=NULL, iov_len=0}, {iov_base="", iov_len=0}], 3) = 12

poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, -1)= 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
recvmsg(3, {msg_name=NULL, msg_namelen=0, 
msg_iov=[{iov_base="\1\1?3\0\0\0\0006\1\0\0\316\271*\1\323\2K\1\323\2K\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 
iov_len=4096}], msg_iovlen=1, msg_controllen=0, msg_flags=0}, 0) = 32

poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN|POLLOUT}], 1, -1) = 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLOUT}])
writev(3, [{iov_base="&\0\2\0\316\271*\1", iov_len=8}, {iov_base=NULL, 
iov_len=0}, {iov_base="", iov_len=0}], 3) = 8

poll([{fd=3, events=POLLIN}], 1, -1)= 1 ([{fd=3, revents=POLLIN}])
recvmsg(3, {msg_name=NULL, msg_namelen=0, 
msg_iov=[{iov_base="\1\1@3\0\0\0\0006\1\0\0\317\271*\1\323\2K\1?\1\202\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 
iov_len=4096}], 

Re: Xlog and Hamlib-4

2020-12-01 Thread Barry Jackson

On 27/11/2020 02:40, Andy Stewart wrote:

On 11/26/20 6:36 PM, Barry Jackson wrote:

On 31/10/2020 02:55, Andy Stewart wrote:


HI Barry,


--

Let me know if you continue to have issues.


Hi Andy,
OK I finally found time to have another look at this.

I started by rebuilding against a recent hamlib snapshot.


Hi Barry,

I need very specific details in order to attempt to reproduce this problem.

* if the xlog version is not 2.0.19, please try again with that version, 
which is the latest


* Exact version of hamlib (ideally, the link from where you downloaded it)

* Exact type and version of Linux

* If you did any custom configuration when you compiled hamlib and/or 
xlog, I'll need those instructions as well


* I don't have a TS-405S, so I may not be able to reproduce the problem, 
but I will try.


Thanks, and 73,

Andy



Hi Andy,
I just realized that I still had not managed to send you the info you need.

I have tried three times but every time the message is rejected as spam.

I will try again now if I can remember what this is all about ;)

The best way to give you all the info you need is to point you to my 
local build server repository where you will find:


The full package build log:

http://mtf.duckdns.org/pub/linux/barjac/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/log/xlog-2.0.19-2.1.mga8_bcj.src.rpm/build.0.20201126222709.log

The versioned packages comprising the build chroot:

http://mtf.duckdns.org/pub/linux/barjac/distrib/cauldron/x86_64/log/xlog-2.0.19-2.1.mga8_bcj.src.rpm/rpm_qa.0.20201126222709.log

Hamlib snapshot git# and date are in the packagename which is listed in 
the packages list above, and was taken from the hamlib site as a source 
tarball. Other software like klog, wsjtx, jscall, fldigi are working 
fine built against it.


I am building for the imminent release of Mageia (8 aka Cauldron where 
the next release is cooked up :)


I will see if this mail sends OK. If not I will put it in a tarball and 
add it as an attachment and try again.


Let me know if I can help further with maybe a back trace or strace output.

Cheers,
Barry



Re: Xlog and Hamlib-4

2020-11-26 Thread Andy Stewart

On 11/26/20 6:36 PM, Barry Jackson wrote:

On 31/10/2020 02:55, Andy Stewart wrote:


HI Barry,


--

Let me know if you continue to have issues.


Hi Andy,
OK I finally found time to have another look at this.

I started by rebuilding against a recent hamlib snapshot.


Hi Barry,

I need very specific details in order to attempt to reproduce this problem.

* if the xlog version is not 2.0.19, please try again with that version, which 
is the latest


* Exact version of hamlib (ideally, the link from where you downloaded it)

* Exact type and version of Linux

* If you did any custom configuration when you compiled hamlib and/or xlog, 
I'll need those instructions as well


* I don't have a TS-405S, so I may not be able to reproduce the problem, but I 
will try.


Thanks, and 73,

Andy

--
Andy Stewart (KB1OIQ)
Vice President: PART of Westford, MA (WB1GOF)



Re: Xlog and Hamlib-4

2020-11-26 Thread Barry Jackson

On 31/10/2020 02:55, Andy Stewart wrote:


HI Barry,


--

Let me know if you continue to have issues.


Hi Andy,
OK I finally found time to have another look at this.

I started by rebuilding against a recent hamlib snapshot.

I then was going to delete the .xlog, but instead looked carefully at 
the contents.


My rig is TS-450S and I know that the new hamlib ID is 2003

In the xlog.cfg it had 2004!

I changed the ID in the config file to 2003 and bingo, xlog ran without 
crash and hamlib works.


Now when I go into the Hamlib settings dialogue it displays 2002!

If I click on the "Select your Radio" button Bang! it crashes.

[baz@jackodesktop .xlog]$ xlog
Hash collision!!! Fatal error!!
[baz@jackodesktop .xlog]

I have seen that error in klog, before Jaime fixed it for hamlib-4 but I 
don't know what he did. It was related to getting the radio list from 
Hamlib, which looks like the same place.


I Hope that helps,

Cheers,
Barry
G4MKT





Re: Xlog and Hamlib-4

2020-11-14 Thread Barry Jackson

On 31/10/2020 02:55, Andy Stewart wrote:


HI Barry,

The following stack worked for me:

* Andy's Ham Radio Linux, version 24c+ (my next dev release), which is 
based on Ubuntu 18.04.*


* Xlog 2.0.19

* hamlib-4.0-rc2

* ICOM 7300 on /dev/ttyUSB0

* I started with a blank ~/.xlog directory.

* I started Xlog and reconfigured hamlib, taking care to choose the 
updated rig number.


* When the POWER entry is listed in the QSO entry window, it will say 
UNKNOWN if the rig power is set to 0, but otherwise, it reflected the 
rig power setting.  Try ctrl-Y ctrl-K for a quick erase/update of the 
QSO entry window.


I was able to duplicate the condition of hamlib hanging xlog, but that 
always happens when you turn off the rig with hamlib enabled and Xlog is 
still running.  Xlog eventually comes out of it.  This isn't ideal, but 
it is nothing new for Xlog, either.  Turning the rig on again causes the 
software to be happy again.


Let me know if you continue to have issues.

73,

Andy



Thanks Andy,
Sorry for the delay, been busy with other stuff.

The Hamlib daily snapshots are here:
http://n0nb.users.sourceforge.net/

I have been using these to keep up to date with the latest fixes etc. in 
the hope that something would solve the problem which is also affecting 
klog.


I will test new builds of xlog in a clean environment, and have noted 
the rig number changes.


I will also play with rigctl, however wsjtx is working OK.

Barry



Re: Xlog and Hamlib-4

2020-10-30 Thread Andy Stewart



HI Barry,

The following stack worked for me:

* Andy's Ham Radio Linux, version 24c+ (my next dev release), which is based on 
Ubuntu 18.04.*


* Xlog 2.0.19

* hamlib-4.0-rc2

* ICOM 7300 on /dev/ttyUSB0

* I started with a blank ~/.xlog directory.

* I started Xlog and reconfigured hamlib, taking care to choose the updated rig 
number.


* When the POWER entry is listed in the QSO entry window, it will say UNKNOWN 
if the rig power is set to 0, but otherwise, it reflected the rig power 
setting.  Try ctrl-Y ctrl-K for a quick erase/update of the QSO entry window.


I was able to duplicate the condition of hamlib hanging xlog, but that always 
happens when you turn off the rig with hamlib enabled and Xlog is still 
running.  Xlog eventually comes out of it.  This isn't ideal, but it is nothing 
new for Xlog, either.  Turning the rig on again causes the software to be happy 
again.


Let me know if you continue to have issues.

73,

Andy

--
Andy Stewart (KB1OIQ)
Vice President: PART of Westford, MA (WB1GOF)



Re: Xlog and Hamlib-4

2020-10-30 Thread Andy Stewart

On 10/30/20 10:56 AM, Barry Jackson wrote:

On 30/10/2020 13:41, Andy Stewart wrote:



I recommend moving your config file to a safe place and restarting xlog with 
no config file, as an experiment.


Yes I did this effectively by using a new user and later by just re-naming the 
~/.xlog dir.
That allows the program to start without crashing, but would lock up when 
trying to enter settings in hamlib config dialog when using hamlib-4.0


HI Barry,

Did you notice in the release notes for hamlib-4.0-rc2 that the model numbers 
for all of the rigs have changed?


https://sourceforge.net/projects/hamlib/files/hamlib/4.0%7Erc2/

My question: are you using the correct value for the model of rig that you are 
using?


Did you try using the rigctl program to isolate potential hamlib issues from 
potential xlog issues?





I have not tested xlog with hamlib-4.0.


On Ubuntu 18.04, I just compiled xlog with hamlib-4.0 and saw no issues.  Note: 
I have not tested it with my rig (yet).  That's next.




I just built hamlib-4.1 and xlog against it and I can now edit the hamlib 
settings without a hang or crash, however rig control fails to work at all, 
even using a manual config string for the port. It just fails to communicate, 
looking at the hamlib tracker in xlog.


Where are you finding hamlib-4.1?  On Sourceforge, I'm finding hamlib-4.0-rc2, 
which is what I'm currently using for testing the latest version of xlog.


Thanks, and 73,

Andy

--
Andy Stewart (KB1OIQ)
Vice President: PART of Westford, MA (WB1GOF)



Re: Xlog and Hamlib-4

2020-10-30 Thread Barry Jackson

On 30/10/2020 13:41, Andy Stewart wrote:



I recommend moving your config file to a safe place and restarting xlog 
with no config file, as an experiment.


Yes I did this effectively by using a new user and later by just 
re-naming the ~/.xlog dir.
That allows the program to start without crashing, but would lock up 
when trying to enter settings in hamlib config dialog when using hamlib-4.0



I have not tested xlog with hamlib-4.0.


I just built hamlib-4.1 and xlog against it and I can now edit the 
hamlib settings without a hang or crash, however rig control fails to 
work at all, even using a manual config string for the port. It just 
fails to communicate, looking at the hamlib tracker in xlog.


wsjtx-2.3.0-rc1 and klog-1.4rc5 are working fine built with hamlib-4.1 
so it does look like an xlog issue.


I'm not familiar with Mageia.  It is an Ubuntu derivative, and if so, 
from which version of Ubuntu are you seeing an issue?  I've not tested 
anything past 18.04.


No, Mageia has no connection to *buntus whatsoever. It was forked from 
Mandrake/Mandriva in 2010 but is community driven with no commercial 
ties :) RPM based like Fedora, SuSe etc.


I maintain most of our radio related packages and am currently tying up 
loose ends for the next Mageia release (Mageia 8).


I can only test Hamlib with my Kenwood TS450S, but please let me know 
how/if I can help to resolve this.


73,
Barry
G4MKT




Thanks for the report, and 73,

Andy
Xlog maintainer






Re: Xlog and Hamlib-4

2020-10-30 Thread Andy Stewart

On 10/29/20 7:06 PM, Barry Jackson wrote:

Hello - first visit here!

I am having issues with xlog segfaulting when launched on a system that has a 
config file that was created in an earlier version.


Hi Barry,

I recommend moving your config file to a safe place and restarting xlog with no 
config file, as an experiment.




I have narrowed this down (I think) to the fact that the new system has 
hamlib-4.0.0.


I have not tested xlog with hamlib-4.0.



I filed a bug report about this but have had no response as yet.

https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?59362


I'll take a look.



By chance I was just looking at this list recent archive and saw some 
discussion about hamlib and xlog, so here I am.


I maintain (or try to) xlog in Mageia.

Barry



I'm not familiar with Mageia.  It is an Ubuntu derivative, and if so, from 
which version of Ubuntu are you seeing an issue?  I've not tested anything past 
18.04.


Thanks for the report, and 73,

Andy
Xlog maintainer

--
Andy Stewart (KB1OIQ)
Vice President: PART of Westford, MA (WB1GOF)



Xlog and Hamlib-4

2020-10-29 Thread Barry Jackson

Hello - first visit here!

I am having issues with xlog segfaulting when launched on a system that 
has a config file that was created in an earlier version.


I have narrowed this down (I think) to the fact that the new system has 
hamlib-4.0.0.


I filed a bug report about this but have had no response as yet.

https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?59362

By chance I was just looking at this list recent archive and saw some 
discussion about hamlib and xlog, so here I am.


I maintain (or try to) xlog in Mageia.

Barry



Re: Xlog and Hamlib ...

2020-10-15 Thread Andy Stewart

On 10/15/20 11:38 AM, gliderpi...@protonmail.com wrote:

Folks,

I compiled from the source the latest release of Xlog  2.0.19 running Ubuntu 
20.04 with the latest HamLib 4.1  (http://n0nb.users.sourceforge.net/) and 
tested it with a Kenwood TS-890S.  I found the "Band" frequencies was the only 
success data transferred from the radio.   Xlog was unable to get the data for 
"Mode", "Power".   I tested Hamlib 4.1 and was successful getting these 
parameters using rigctl on the TS-890S.    Has anyone else have any issue using 
the latest release of Hamlib and Xlog?


73's, Oscar (N6PAZ).

Sent from ProtonMail <https://protonmail.ch>, encrypted email based in 
Switzerland.




HI Oscar,

Mode should have worked.  I'm not sure about power.  I have not tested Xlog on 
Ubuntu 20.*, nor have I tested it with Hamlib 4.1.  I would use the Hamlib 
rigctl program to verify that Hamlib is working correctly.


73,

Andy

--
Andy Stewart (KB1OIQ)
Vice President: PART of Westford, MA (WB1GOF)



Xlog and Hamlib ...

2020-10-15 Thread gliderpilot
Folks,

I compiled from the source the latest release of Xlog 2.0.19 running Ubuntu 
20.04 with the latest HamLib 4.1 (http://n0nb.users.sourceforge.net/) and 
tested it with a Kenwood TS-890S. I found the "Band" frequencies was the only 
success data transferred from the radio. Xlog was unable to get the data for 
"Mode", "Power". I tested Hamlib 4.1 and was successful getting these 
parameters using rigctl on the TS-890S. Has anyone else have any issue using 
the latest release of Hamlib and Xlog?

73's, Oscar (N6PAZ).

Sent from [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.ch), encrypted email based in 
Switzerland.

[Xlog-discussion] hamlib rigcontrol

2011-05-17 Thread n4dsp
When one makes changes in rigcontrol of hamlib do these values have to
be saved? If so what is the command?

thanks


___
Xlog-discussion mailing list
Xlog-discussion@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/xlog-discussion


Re: [Xlog-discussion] Hamlib error in 1.9

2009-02-15 Thread Joop Stakenborg
Op zaterdag 14-02-2009 om 21:13 uur [tijdzone -0500], schreef John B.
Egger:

 Thanks for your advice. Sorry for the delay in responding, but it's 
 taken me a while to solve the issue. In the hamlib help forum, Martin 
 (AA6E) suggested the latest CVS build of hamlib. When I downloaded and 
 compiled it, the hamlib problem with Xlog 1.9 was solved. The country 
 maps are terrific.
 

Thanks for reporting back John, glad to help out.

 Of course now you have 2.0 out, so I'm still a step behind...

Have fun with the new version!

Regards,
Joop PG4I



___
Xlog-discussion mailing list
Xlog-discussion@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/xlog-discussion


Re: [Xlog-discussion] Hamlib error in 1.9

2009-02-14 Thread John B. Egger

Joop Stakenborg wrote:

Op woensdag 04-02-2009 om 21:41 uur [tijdzone -0500], schreef John B.
Egger:
  
Perhaps this isn't the place for this question but all I could find in 
sourceforge/hamlib was a developers' forum and I'm a long way from 
being a developer.


  


Hi John,

judging from the output it is not a xlog problem, I see at least 2
errors. The hamlib-devel mailing list is a good starting point for
fixing this.

xlog tries to retrieve mode, power level (if you have the field
enabled), frequency, ptt and your s-meter value. This is done by polling
the rig every x millisecond if you have polling enabled. You might want
to make this time a little longer to see if this helps.

You should make yourself familiar with the rigctl binary. It is in the
ultimate tool for debugging hamlib. It is available in the hamlib-utils
package. People on the hamlib-devel can tell you if the orion II is
fully supported.

Regards,
Joop PG4I


  

Joop,

Thanks for your advice. Sorry for the delay in responding, but it's 
taken me a while to solve the issue. In the hamlib help forum, Martin 
(AA6E) suggested the latest CVS build of hamlib. When I downloaded and 
compiled it, the hamlib problem with Xlog 1.9 was solved. The country 
maps are terrific.


Of course now you have 2.0 out, so I'm still a step behind...


___
Xlog-discussion mailing list
Xlog-discussion@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/xlog-discussion


Re: [Xlog-discussion] Hamlib error in 1.9

2009-02-04 Thread John B. Egger

John B. Egger wrote:
I just installed 1.9 and after its initial frequency reading get a 
There was an error communicating with your rig, hamlib has stopped. 
I'm using an Orion II. Running rigctl -r /dev/ttyS1 -m 1608 and 
entering f gives the correct frequence, m the correct mode and 
passband.


I installed Xlog 1.9 using Synaptic, from the Debian sid repository. I 
can hunt down the gtk version, etc., if needed.


Perhaps this isn't the place for this question but all I could find in 
sourceforge/hamlib was a developers' forum and I'm a long way from 
being a developer.



PS: This is hamlib.out:

rig:rig_init called
rig:rig_open called
TX 3 bytes
 3f 56 0d?V.
RX 15 characters
 56 65 72 73 69 6f 6e 20 32 2e 30 33 39 64 2dTX 3 bytes
 3f 53 0d?S.
RX 4 characters
 35 36 36 0d566.
** retry after delay (io=12, retry=0) **
RX 12 characters
 40 53 52 4d 30 36 39 53 30 33 32 0d@SRM069S032.
TX 3 bytes
 3f 53 0d?S.
RX 12 characters
 40 53 52 4d 30 36 39 53 30 33 32 0d@SRM069S032.
tt565_get_level: unsupported level 1073741824
rig:rig_close called
rig:rig_cleanup called

I hope that is helpful...

--
John
Registered Linux User #291592
Klikit-Linux-0.2-RC3



___
Xlog-discussion mailing list
Xlog-discussion@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/xlog-discussion


Re: [Xlog-discussion] Hamlib in 1.8: No QSO-pane data

2008-08-31 Thread Joop Stakenborg
Op zaterdag 30-08-2008 om 19:35 uur [tijdzone -0400], schreef John B.
Egger:
 I just updated Xlog 1.7 to 1.8. Hamlib provides a frequency readout in 
 my statusbar, as I requested, but Ctrl-K adds no information from the 
 transceiver to the QSO pane (only the date and time).
 
 I'm using the same parameters (selection of radio and device) as in 1.7 
 (which I still have installed on a laptop, so comparisons are easy). The 
 ChangeLog didn't seem to show anything related to this.
 
 Anyone else experiencing this, or have I misconfigured 1.8 somehow? I 
 compiled it from the .tar.gz file, since I use a Debian (Kubuntu-based) 
 system. Everything looks fine, except that Ctrl-K doesn't pull in the data.
 

Rob, KL7NA reported the same problem to me in a private mail. I will
have a look at it later this week and when fixed, will make a 1.8.1
release.

Regards,
Joop PG4I



___
Xlog-discussion mailing list
Xlog-discussion@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/xlog-discussion


[Xlog-discussion] Hamlib in 1.8: No QSO-pane data

2008-08-30 Thread John B. Egger
I just updated Xlog 1.7 to 1.8. Hamlib provides a frequency readout in 
my statusbar, as I requested, but Ctrl-K adds no information from the 
transceiver to the QSO pane (only the date and time).


I'm using the same parameters (selection of radio and device) as in 1.7 
(which I still have installed on a laptop, so comparisons are easy). The 
ChangeLog didn't seem to show anything related to this.


Anyone else experiencing this, or have I misconfigured 1.8 somehow? I 
compiled it from the .tar.gz file, since I use a Debian (Kubuntu-based) 
system. Everything looks fine, except that Ctrl-K doesn't pull in the data.


--
--John K3GHH
Registered Linux User #291592
Klikit Linux 0.1-9RC1-G



___
Xlog-discussion mailing list
Xlog-discussion@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/xlog-discussion


Re: [Xlog-discussion] Xlog w/ Hamlib Enabled

2008-06-16 Thread Gary Mackey
Hi -

On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Stephane Fillod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The best way to understand any trouble with remote control is to use
 'rigctl' from Hamlib. Pass the options -vv -m 323 -C rts_state=ON ...
 and see what the traces says. You may join the hamlib-developer mailing
 list to ask for more help.

I was finally able to get xlog talking to my radio by swapping my
generic serial port CI-V cable with a USB CI-V interface I had as a
spare. I'm a little confused why this solved the problem since the
serial port interface works fine when the same PC is running under
Windows and using Windows based logging/rig control programs. And I
had used this same serial port CI-V interface several years ago on a
Mandrake 9, and then a FC2 system using xlog and hamlib at that time.
My TTY ports appear to be fine on the current Unbuntu system. I'm
currently TTYS1 to successfully key my radio for fldigi. But I must
admit this is not the same PC that I was using 4 or 5 years ago. The
new PC has no on-board serial ports and I had to install a 4 serial
port PCI card to use my legacy serial devices.

Thanks to who replied.

73,
...Gary,K8EHB


___
Xlog-discussion mailing list
Xlog-discussion@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/xlog-discussion


Re: [Xlog-discussion] hamlib freq display

2008-04-12 Thread Joop Stakenborg
 Here is a minor issue, one that was momentarily confusing to me (v1.7):

 In Preferences - Hamlib, the last item says

 Round frequency to  -N- characters

 For my rig (TT Orion), what really happens is that the frequency display
 is rounded to 10^N Hz.  In fact, as N increases, the number of
 characters decreases.  It might be clearer to say something like

 Round frequency at digit -N- (0 = 1 Hz, 1 = 10 Hz, ...)

 Your tip for the day!


Great tip, thanks!

 73 Martin AA6E


 --
 Martin Ewing, AA6E
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 +1-203-315-5160


Joop PG4I



___
Xlog-discussion mailing list
Xlog-discussion@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/xlog-discussion


[Xlog-discussion] hamlib freq display

2008-04-11 Thread Martin Ewing AA6E

Here is a minor issue, one that was momentarily confusing to me (v1.7):

In Preferences - Hamlib, the last item says

Round frequency to  -N- characters

For my rig (TT Orion), what really happens is that the frequency display 
is rounded to 10^N Hz.  In fact, as N increases, the number of 
characters decreases.  It might be clearer to say something like


Round frequency at digit -N- (0 = 1 Hz, 1 = 10 Hz, ...)

Your tip for the day!

73 Martin AA6E


--
Martin Ewing, AA6E
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1-203-315-5160




___
Xlog-discussion mailing list
Xlog-discussion@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/xlog-discussion