Dear Davide -
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Hal Dell wrote:
Dear Clement Francis / Davide -
First at all xmail doc for smtp.ipprop.tab syntax says :
Address selection mask are formed by an IP address
(network) plus the number of valid bits inside the network mask
[...snip...]
Dear David Lord -
I've still not worked out if you want mail coming in via postini to
be allowed to be relayed or if postini is just an external filter fo
scanning some of your incoming mail. If the latter, I can't see
why it should need to be treated different to any other incoming
email.
Can't you create a new instance of XMail just for Postini (in-
postini.myisp.com) and set that up to only allow connections from
Postini's servers? For MailLaunder, we suggest our clients only
accept untrusted email from our IP block.
Then have the in-postini.myisp.com forward to the
: lundi 5 mai 2008 08:21
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Lockdown xMail
I am offended buy your comment sir -- even in fun - to be clear my =
original
eMail did NOT solicit any business from the list. Your comments take =
away
from the urgency of the issue at hand and the fact
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Don Drake
Envoy=E9 : lundi 5 mai 2008 16:24
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Lockdown xMail
Can't you create a new instance of XMail just for Postini (in-=20
postini.myisp.com) and set that up to only allow connections from =20
Deal Clement Francis -
It was just a joke, because your Postini presentation
looked like a 'promotional' mail, so take it like a joke :)
Sorry if I offended you, it was not wanted.
I appreciate your comment. Normally, I would jest too...
However, you have to understand this is a huge issue
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Hal Dell
Envoy=E9 : lundi 5 mai 2008 17:55
=C0 : xmail@xmailserver.org
Objet : [xmail] Re: Lockdown xMail
However, you have to understand this is a huge issue
for my customers and a lot of my customers
Dear Francis -
Is this mailing list a marketing place ? :)
If so, Davide, it's time to get some money from google to make
xmail 'postini' compliant :) (Or should I say : to help google make
postini 'auth' standard compliant to be able to be compatible with
xmail and other 'standard' smtp
On 4 May 2008 at 13:00, Hal Dell wrote:
..
It is my understanding that Mail-Auth was designed be to implement a
submission port as defined by RFC 4409?
In fact, RFC 4409 states: 3.2. Message Rejection and Bouncing.
MTAs and MSAs MAY implement message rejection rules that rely in
Dear David Lord -
I've still not worked out if you want mail coming in via postini to be
allowed
to be relayed or if postini is just an external filter for scanning some
of your
incoming mail. If the latter, I can't see why it should need to be treated
different
to any other incoming email.
On 4 May 2008 at 22:16, Hal Dell wrote:
Dear David Lord -
I've still not worked out if you want mail coming in via postini to be
allowed
to be relayed or if postini is just an external filter for scanning some
of your
incoming mail. If the latter, I can't see why it should need to be
-Message d'origine-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: xmail@xmailserver.org
Date: 03/05/08 06:49
Objet: [xmail] Re: Lockdown xMail
On Fri, 2 May 2008, David Lord wrote:
On 2 May 2008 at 10:27, Hal Dell wrote:
Hello...
For those of you who don't know Postini -- the company was founded
Hello...
For those of you who don't know Postini -- the company was founded in 1999
in California as a eMail Communication Security and Compliance company. By
May 2004 it was relaying 1.4B eMail annually for over 3300 companies.
Postini was recently purchased by Google for just over 1/2 Billon
On 2 May 2008 at 10:27, Hal Dell wrote:
Hello...
For those of you who don't know Postini -- the company was founded in 1999
in California as a eMail Communication Security and Compliance company. By
May 2004 it was relaying 1.4B eMail annually for over 3300 companies.
Postini was recently
On Fri, 2 May 2008, David Lord wrote:
On 2 May 2008 at 10:27, Hal Dell wrote:
Hello...
For those of you who don't know Postini -- the company was founded in 1999
in California as a eMail Communication Security and Compliance company. By
May 2004 it was relaying 1.4B eMail annually
Thanks to every for their help. I'll be waiting on the fix to solve the
Postini problem.
Thanks,
Hal Dell
Managing Partner
ePodWorks.net, Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line help in
At 06.45 25/04/08, you wrote:
Greylisting is not working as well as it used to... Verizon, Hotmail and
Yahoo Mail seem to not re-send correctly when Graylisting is ON. I previously
posted about this
AFAIK it is only Yahoo Groups that does no resend and requires xnet
or white list. In any
-Message d'origine-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: xmail@xmailserver.org
Date: 25/04/08 10:33
Objet: [xmail] Re: Lockdown xMail
At 06.45 25/04/08, you wrote:
Greylisting is not working as well as it used to... Verizon, Hotmail
and
Yahoo Mail seem to not re-send correctly when Graylisting
Guys... Thanks for all of you input... Of course Postini is just another
solution.
It is just unfortunate that I'm the the first one to try to make Postini
work with
xMail here in April 2008.
I guess I have to wait on Davide to solve this problem.
Thanks,
Hal Dell
Managing Partner
be configured to send to a specific port)
In either cases don't add any Smtp-config line for the ip/port allocated for
postini.
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: xmail@xmailserver.org
Date: 25/04/08 15:26
Objet: [xmail] Re: Lockdown xMail
Guys... Thanks for all
-Message d'origine-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: xmail@xmailserver.org
Date: 24/04/08 05:21
Objet: [xmail] Re: Lockdown xMail
Dear Francis -
Effectively, it seems the MailAuth feature does not take into
account the 'WhiteList' parameter in the smtp.ipprop.tab file.
But should
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Hal Dell wrote:
Dear Clement Francis / Davide -
First at all xmail doc for smtp.ipprop.tab syntax says :
Address selection mask are formed by an IP address
(network) plus the number of valid bits inside the network mask
[...snip...]
96.227.65.4/32
Dear Davide -
OK, I lied to you. Actually, I forgot about mailauth no being clear
by ipprop. Note for self: Add an smtp.iprop.tab option to release
the MailAuth constraint.
Thanks for getting to the bottom of this.
Any chance I could get a test binary for Windows that I could use
to make
If you need a quick temporary solution to your spam problems you should
look into putting an Untangle server ( www.untangle.com ) in transparent
mode between your mail server and the outside world. It's free and can
be set to block most spam. Transparent mode is just as it sounds, you
don't have
% !) without complex setup, and all handled by xmail.
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: 'xmail@xmailserver.org'
Date: 24/04/08 18:07
Objet: [xmail] Re: Lockdown xMail
If you need a quick temporary solution to your spam problems you should
look into putting an Untangle
Cool :)
Thanks Davide !
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: xmail@xmailserver.org
Date: 24/04/08 17:17
Objet: [xmail] Re: Lockdown xMail
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Hal Dell wrote:
Dear Clement Francis / Davide -
First at all xmail doc for smtp.ipprop.tab syntax
xmail CustMapList (I use spamhaust.org very good)
Davide glst for xmail (excluding auth users with eax setting in smtp-in
filter)
some av filter for xmail
I used spamhaus.org at my Firewall and filter out 8-10K eMails per hour
during the day and the SPAM keeps coming.
Greylisting is not
: 23/04/08 05:57
Objet: [xmail] Re: Lockdown xMail
Dear Clement Francis / Davide -
First at all xmail doc for smtp.ipprop.tab syntax says :
Address selection mask are formed by an IP address
(network) plus the number of valid bits inside the network mask
[...snip...]
96.227.65.4/32
Dear Francis -
Effectively, it seems the MailAuth feature does not take into
account the 'WhiteList' parameter in the smtp.ipprop.tab file.
But should it be the case as the smtp.ipprop.tab Whitelist is
supposed to be used to change ip checks ?
Davide is the one who suggested the
Then redoo your telnet tests, and if it don't work, report again :)
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: xmail@xmailserver.org
Date: 22/04/08 06:22
Objet: [xmail] Re: Lockdown xMail
Dear Davide -
On 4/18/2008 3:24PM ET you responded to my eMail about how
to lockdown
Dear Clement Francis / Davide -
First at all xmail doc for smtp.ipprop.tab syntax says :
Address selection mask are formed by an IP address
(network) plus the number of valid bits inside the network mask
[...snip...]
96.227.65.4/32 WhiteList=1
Yes, I was wondering if the parser
Dear Davide -
On 4/18/2008 3:24PM ET you responded to my eMail about how
to lockdown xMail for use with Postini or any private mail Relay.
My OS is Windows 2003 Enterprise R2 Server SP2 running xMail 1.25.
Please note that I do have two instances of xMail running on
the same server. As far as
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Hal Dell wrote:
Dear Davide -
As you can see from my previous messages I was unable to lockdown the xMail
Server based upon the config below. I did discover that SmtpConfig now seems
to work after an upgrade from 1.24 to 1.25.
Now , when I attempt to connect
Hello All...
I have an external eMail Server that accepts inbound eMail then relays all
of the
eMail to my internal xMail Server. eMail Clients wanting to send eMails out
will
connect to the xMail Server.
I want to force any SMTP connections to xMail to require Authentication and
the only
allow
Dear Davide -
As you can see from my previous messages I was unable to lockdown the xMail
Server based upon the config below. I did discover that SmtpConfig now seems
to work after an upgrade from 1.24 to 1.25.
Now , when I attempt to connect directly and type Mail
from:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
didn't forget something :)
Francis
-Message d'origine-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A: xmail@xmailserver.org
Date: 25/02/08 16:06
Objet: [xmail] Re: Lockdown xMail SMTP
Hello al...
How do I configure xMail so that it is locked down -- such that xMail
will
only accept eMail from authenticated
Hello al...
How do I configure xMail so that it is locked down -- such that xMail will
only accept eMail from authenticated eMail clients.
In my case I have an upstream MTA that excepts mail from the outside world
-- thus the IP address of this MTA is in the SMTPRELAY.TAB file.
Thanks,
Hal
37 matches
Mail list logo
