Hi,
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
Auftrag von Frans Englich
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. April 2006 17:24
An: xml@gnome.org
Betreff: [xml] IDC bug?
Either I'm not using IDCs correctly(which may very well be
the case), or
there's
Hi,
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
Auftrag von Coleman Brumley
Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. April 2006 14:34
An: xml@gnome.org
Betreff: [xml] Win32 compile settings
What settings were used to compile the Win32 binaries at
zlatkovic.com?
cruntime=/MT, cruntime=/MTd,
Title: XSLT - changed handling of attrs exclude-result-prefixes andextension-element-prefixes
Hi,
We changed the handling of exclude-result-prefixes and
extension-element-prefixes in Libxslt.
Daniel noted that this change will probably break
some XSLT stuff out there, so I want to notify
Hi,
I want to inform you that I currently put the aside the intention of
adding xmlDOMWrapSetAttr(Node) and xmlDOMWrapRemoveAttr(Node)
functionality. Looking at the code of the Delphi-wrapper, I'm having
difficulties in finding oppropriate code to be put into Libxml2,
which does what I need
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 11:00 -0500, Jason Viers wrote:
[...]
When children are created, they automatically inherit their parents' ns,
so as long as you call xmlSetNs before any further children are added,
they'll use the prefix too. If you want a child node to NOT use the
prefix, just
Hi,
Although your example is not complete, I'll try to comment your
scenario:
1) Import the correct schema for XML:
xs:import namespace=http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace;
schemaLocation=http://www.w3.org/2001/xml.xsd/
2) Define the simple-type gemq:GEMPriceCode, which you
Hi,
On Sat, 2006-02-25 at 08:09 -0500, Rob Richards wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
functions). Lastly, if the function is only returning a 0 or -1, would
it make more sense to just return the actual attribute (again similar to
the libxml2 function).
i.e.:
xmlAttrPtr
Hi,
The code for looking up default/fixed attributes in the DTD in
the functions xmlGetNsProp() and xmlHasNsProp() differs.
I think this lookup is broken in xmlGetNsProp(): it won't find an
attribute with a prefix, unless @name is intended to be a QName, but
I don't think so, since it is compared
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 17:44 -0500, Rob Richards wrote:
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 09:49:04PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thinking this over again, plus taking into account what you said about
reusing the code in tree.c, I now think that the DOM-wrapper
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 07:05 -0500, Rob Richards wrote:
Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
[...]
OK. Now that I have disgusted you with the narrow entry point: can we
already foresee which additional xmlDOMWrapXXX functions we need?
I think it would be good for Daniel to see what additional
Hi
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 19:39 -0500, Rob Richards wrote:
Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 16:06 +0100, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 08:56 -0500, Rob Richards wrote:
Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
As far as copy/import/adopt
Hi,
An interesting idea about switching ID indexing on/off:
http://www.jdom.org/pipermail/jdom-interest/2002-November/011001.html
Kasimier
___
xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/
xml@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 07:29 -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 01:03:24PM +0100, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
The problem occurs regardless of a validation being performed or not.
Example:
!DOCTYPE foo [
!ELEMENT foo (bar)
!ELEMENT bar
!ATTLIST bar myId
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 08:08 -0500, Rob Richards wrote:
Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
Hi
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 19:39 -0500, Rob Richards wrote:
How do you figure (or are you referring to the case of a document not
parsed in validating mode)? A DTD doesn't allow a redefinition
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 09:15 -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 03:05:46PM +0100, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
[ ... cut an invalid example ... ]
According to Daniel, the IDness based on DTDs can really be queried by a
element/attribute combination, without caring
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 11:08 -0500, Rob Richards wrote:
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 04:05:21PM +0100, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
Daniel, could we have that flag field on xmlDoc?
Explain clearly the semantic of it. A priori I'm not too fond of it
if we
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 11:17 +1300, Andrew Miller wrote:
[...]
From DOM Level 2 Core specification:
As far as the DOM is concerned, special attributes used for declaring XML
namespaces are still exposed and can be manipulated just like any other
attribute. However, nodes are permanently
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 16:06 +0100, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 08:56 -0500, Rob Richards wrote:
[...]
About 2b):
I would be happy if we could agree on using the adopt semantics
prior to handing nodes over to tree-modyfing functions. Although
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 16:06 +0100, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 08:56 -0500, Rob Richards wrote:
Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
As far as copy/import/adopt goes. I have found a couple of conflicting
opinions for this. One is that the importing doc should determine
Hi,
The xs:boolean bug is fixed in CVS, xmlschemastypes.c, revision 1.106.
The XSI bug is fixed in CVS, xmlschemas.c, revision 1.193.
Thanks for the report!
Regards,
Kasimier
[...]
___
xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 18:34 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hate windows.
I downloaded the libxml2 latest release (2.6.23) binaries from
http://www.zlatkovic.com/libxml.en.html. I can't seem to tell if they
are compiled with /MD or /MT. If anyone can give me a clue it would
be
Hi,
Bugzilla:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331273
Regards,
Kasimier
___
xml mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/
xml@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 08:50 -0500, Rob Richards wrote:
After reading this thread and the comments in the bug report I have a
few questions/comments.
Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
To me the most logical would be to do surgery on your input stream
you are modifying it by changing its
Hi,
We have the following code in tree.c, xmlCopyPropInternal():
if ((target!= NULL) (cur!= NULL)
(target-doc != NULL) (cur-doc != NULL)
(cur-doc-ids != NULL) (cur-parent != NULL)) {
if (xmlIsID(cur-doc, cur-parent, cur)) {
[... add the id to the target doc ...]
}
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 11:13 -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 03:52:46PM +0100, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
Hi,
We have the following code in tree.c, xmlCopyPropInternal():
if ((target!= NULL) (cur!= NULL)
(target-doc != NULL) (cur-doc != NULL
On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 11:45 +0100, Trond Aksel Myklebust wrote:
Hello,
If I got a XML document with XML Schema defined for it, is it possible
for a given node in the XML document to get the complexType name (if
existing) the node belongs to and the datatype for the node?
I.e, if I got a
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 20:40 +0530, venkat naidu wrote:
[...]
later one of my friend said we require even testapi.exe ( most
important) for testing..
so again i gone through MakeFile.msvc , some where in utils: task i
have added testapi.exe
Yes, we need to add testapi.exe to the 3
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 18:50 +0530, venkat naidu wrote:
thanks a lot Mr.daniel
i think it will be a lenghty mail but i want explain you all so that
you wont feel bad.. okk
i have given libXML 2.6.20 and i was supposed to build binaries in
win32 system , i have follwed the
to the type-definitions of that module as they are currently
displayed at: http://www.linuxbase.org/spec//book/XML/XML.html ; i.e.
I'm fine with them.
Regards,
Kasimier
Thanks again,
-Rajesh
-Original Message-
From: Kasimier Buchcik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 15:53 -0800, Banginwar, Rajesh wrote:
Hi,
Please find the LSB specification for libxml2 library at
http://www.linuxbase.org/spec//book/XML/XML.html.
The plan is to have a separate module for XML. For the time being,
libxml2 library will part of LSB desktop
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 03:27 -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 10:31:46PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I'm just repeating my question in case it went out of focus:
Does anyone see problems wrt adding a public wrapper for
xmlStaticCopyNode() which also takes a
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 14:14 -0800, Judy Hay wrote:
Hi,
I'm running into a problem with the XML schema validation code when
applied to CDATA sections that happen to have some trailing
whitespace. It seems to be isolated to cases where a namespace is
being used.
The following XML
On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 02:17 +0100, Paul Boddie wrote:
Hello!
Don't worry, I don't think this is trivia. I'm happy that this issue
reached the surface once again, since it seems to me still
underestimated by DOM users. I guess the most people using DOM think
that there's no way of how
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 04:29 -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 03:44:14PM -0800, Manish Marathe wrote:
Hello,
If I run libxml2-2.6.22 tests by two different ways
1 way:
./runtest
./runsuite
./testapi
a) 546 errors for Microsoft schema tests
Hi
On Wed, 2005-11-23 at 16:51 +0100, Julien Lamy wrote:
Hi folks,
As the title indicates, XMLSchema-Instance seems to be broken in version
2.6.22 of libxml2.
Consider the following person.xsd file :
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
xsd:schema
Hi,
there was a bug which made the XML Schema processor fail to redefine
some of the components of the XHTML 1.1 schemas.
This is now fixed in CVS: xmlschemas.c, revision 1.181.
In case someone's interested, here are the schemata:
Hi,
Does someone object to add the following function to the XML Schema API?
It assigns a structured error callback to the parser context.
We have already a xmlSchemaSetValidStructuredErrors() counterpart for
the validation context, but for the parser context this was missing.
XMLPUBFUN void
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 19:33 -0500, Sir Woody Hackswell wrote:
Wow! You're right! I respectfully disagree with the standard, but it's
what we must follow. Nillable to me meant that it could have a null
value. It seems silly to me to declare that it's empty... because you
can just
Hi,
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 20:23 -0500, Sir Woody Hackswell wrote:
Hello, all! I believe I've come across a problem with Schema validation.
Here's my scenario:
I have a custom type (in this example, pricetype. My Element is
nillable, but the validator always bombs on it, because the item
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 08:08 -0500, Rob Richards wrote:
When validating with a schema against an empty document,
xmlSchemaFormatNodeForError crashes because the document node, passed in
from xmlSchemaValidateDoc, does not have node-ns and passes the if
(node-ns != NULL) test resulting
Hi Samuel,
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 22:45 +0200, Samuel Díaz García wrote:
Can I do that recompiling 2.6.22 to view where is the posible bug?
Yes, check out the library with CVS - tagged with LIBXML2_2_6_22.
Using the xmllint util as you put on your message? Or putting in a queue
overloading
Hi,
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 19:24 +0200, Samuel Díaz García wrote:
I upgraded libxml2 version and a bug encountered in this release:
regexp error : Memory allocation failed : adding transition
[...]
With the current CVS head I get the following with xmllint:
$ xmllint --noout --schema
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 04:46 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 10:27:36AM +0200, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
$ xmllint --noout --schema ORM_O01.xsd 46\(tabla\).xml
46(tabla).xml validates
Could you add them to the regression tests, so I'm sure I don't
break
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 17:14 +0200, Meunier, Jean-Luc wrote:
Hi,
In Python, I need to validate a DOM tree using a W3C XML schema, but I cannot
figure out how to do it.
It seems that the C-function xmlSchemaValidateDoc does the job but I’m lost
in the Python binding.
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 12:39 +0200, nico wrote:
thank you daniel
hi all,
i have to get node contents of a simple doc of 100 nodes like this
[...]
which parser is appropriate for that job?
i nee the faster one.
XPath is not a parser !!!
SAX2 should be the fastest, but it
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 13:28 +0200, nico wrote:
hi,
i didn't know that 100 nodes are peanuts.
thanks for that point.
I get the following times for an example document
with 100 nodes and xmllint's default parsing which
includes deallocation:
real0m0.003s
user0m0.002s
sys
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 14:26 +0200, nico wrote:
hi
do you include error check for such result?
Le 24 oct. 05, à 14:14, Kasimier Buchcik a écrit :
I get the following times for an example document
with 100 nodes and xmllint's default parsing which
includes deallocation:
real
, 2005-10-24 at 14:26 +0200, nico wrote:
hi
do you include error check for such result?
Le 24 oct. 05, à 14:14, Kasimier Buchcik a écrit :
I get the following times
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 14:22 -0700, Manish Marathe wrote:
I ran tests for libxml 2.6.22
I executed three different test scripts
1) runtest (2608 tests)
2) runsuite (1471 tests)
[...]
There should be Total 32064 tests for runsuite.
Try make tests in the xstc subfolder in order to
Hi,
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 10:14 -0700, Jain, Nilesh wrote:
I am having difficulty accessing the download and release links, though
I am able to access home page.
Try http://www.veillard.com/libxml instead.
Regards,
Kasimier
___
xml mailing list,
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 13:16 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I run xmllint with --valid or --postvalid it does crash when using
the XML output of MAME as input (http://www.breaken.de/temp/output.xml).
Cannot reproduce the crash on my Debian (sarge) box:
[EMAIL
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 14:43 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 13:16 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I run xmllint with --valid or --postvalid it does crash when using
the XML output of MAME as input (http://www.breaken.de/temp/output.xml).
Cannot reproduce
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 13:28 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 12:16:39PM -0500, Vedantam, Pavan wrote:
Hi,
I am using Libxml2 to parse the xml documents and build DOMS, I would like
to know if there is a provision for linking the DOMS so that all the DOMS
are under
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 17:12 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 10:02:38PM +0100, Graham Bennett wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 10:30:06AM +0200, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
Create the schema validation context with a NULL for the @schema
argument if you want to switch
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 09:52 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:40:54AM +0200, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
Another question related to internal regression test suite (runtest),
Are they used to confirm the behavior of public interface or What part
of library do
Hi,
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 18:57 +0200, Juan David Palomino wrote:
Hi to all, i have problems generating a file with encoding UTF-8.
I don't know what to do to create the files with encoding UTF-8. Now i
create the xml files without any encoding.
What function or method set the encoding?
Hi,
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 19:44 +0200, Juan David Palomino wrote:
OK. But what i must to do to save de xml into a string?
Can you tell me how to use xmlSaveFileTo?
I 'm not to be able to pass a xmlOutputBufferPtr to a string.
Did you already looked at:
Hi,
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 18:36 +0200, Samuel Díaz García wrote:
Dear guys, first sorry for my english, and second, the problem.
I have a plain XML in a memory buffer as:
E1
/E1
Parsed in a xmlDocPtr without problems.
In the other hand I have a XSD file to validate the XML buffer
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 02:16 +0200, Luka Por wrote:
Hello.
Library is great, but from version 2-2.6.20 to version 2-2.6.22 i
discover same difference.
I using xmlSchemeParse(...) to validate document.
In version 2-2.6.20 xmlSchemaParse spends 4 seconds, but now in version
2-2.6.22
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 10:30 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 10:00:27AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 02:16:28AM +0200, Luka Por wrote:
Hello.
Library is great, but from version 2-2.6.20 to version 2-2.6.22 i
discover same
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 09:29 +0200, GUY Fabrice wrote:
Hi,
I use the xmlSchemaBasicItem type as the internal most basic
type
for all the schema structs. It would probably be good if the
accessor
functions would take only this type, to be
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 09:29 +0200, GUY Fabrice wrote:
[...]
Maybe you could start a new tread with a more appropriate title...
Sorry, I forgot... yeah, start a new thead if you like.
Regards,
Kasimier
___
xml mailing list, project page
Hi,
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 11:12 +0200, GUY Fabrice wrote:
Hi,
...so OK for the deal, I can try to do that, starting with element
declarations, then maybe IDC definitions. But I must confess that I
have absolutly no idea of the difficulty of this task.
Great!
I use the xmlSchemaBasicItem
Hi,
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 18:58 +0200, GUY Fabrice wrote:
But I noticed that for key and unique constraints, there is no more
indication about the name of the constraint that failed to validate.
For example the following xml file :
?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1 standalone=no?
Hi,
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 10:08 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:04:08AM -0400, Rob Richards wrote:
Daniel Veillard wrote:
Ho ho ... if it's really the same document on both side there is something
fishy, I can't think of anything leading to this, seems it's
Hi,
On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 13:14 +0200, GUY Fabrice wrote:
Hi,
I'm using key / keyref constraints in my schema, and in case of error
the behaviour of the report message is not the same with
libxml2-2.6.19 and libxml2-2.6.20 :
- with the 2.6.19 version, the error is carried by the element
Hi,
there was a bug [1], which should have hit many real life
scenarios when using identity constraints (IDC). Thus I
recommend using the fixed xmlschemas.c, revision 1.165,
if relying on IDCs.
[1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=312957
Greetings,
Kasimier
Hi,
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 12:02 -0500, Trevor Lowing wrote:
Question: If I load() an XML schema as an XML document that contains
xs:includes, are the includes also loaded into the DOM? In not, as appears to
be the case from my attempts, is there any way of doing this? Some XInclude
trick
Hi,
On Sun, 2005-07-10 at 03:32 -0400, Trevor Lowing wrote:
since the XML Schemas implementation does it, and the code is there,
just read it !
Daniel
Sorry to be so thick-skulled but, does the Schemas implementation load
all the includes into one big DOM Document? If so, is
Hi,
Another missing point: element declarations inside an all model group
cannot be used in conjunction with substitution groups yet. This is
another limitation of the automaton module. I don't know if such a
scenario is existing in the S4S.
Regards,
Kasimier
Hi,
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 15:52 -0400, Liam R. E. Quin wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 15:39 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cannot figure out how to use xPath without loading the entire XML into
memory.
This is an implementation-specific question, and for libxml2 the answer
is usually
Hi Frans,
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 22:38 +, Frans Englich wrote:
On Monday 27 June 2005 09:04, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
[...]
4. The complex content model cannot be built in some cases [3]
[...]
A follow up question: how does xmllint's current schema state relate to the
Schema
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 09:23 -0400, Rob Richards wrote:
Ok, just changing my response now as I just noticed it was committed 2
hours ago.
Yes, I was told that it would be easier for someone else to prepare the
release if I commit now ;-)
We still need a name for the context, unless you are
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 10:44 -0400, Rob Richards wrote:
Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
The context has just an initial void * _private field, to be able to
extend it. Adding fields to it, at the end, won't break ABI
compatibility.
How do you not break compatibility? For example, A new
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 16:47 +0200, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 10:44 -0400, Rob Richards wrote:
[...]
To avoid breaking stuff, shouldn't an additional function be added which
returns an initialized context with all fields set to null and be the
required way
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 17:56 -0700, Dhyanesh wrote:
Hi
I am getting a problem in validating xml when extending simple types.
[...]
The second one extends the simple type myDouble and its validation
fails. However if i use the extension base as xs:string or remove the
restriction
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 00:44 +0200, Jonas Holmberg wrote:
Hi.
I have a question about the XPath implementation.
I have tried to get the default attributes from the DTD:s to work with the
XPath lookups.
I am very new to libxml, so if there is a very well known answer, I'm
sorry...
Hi,
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 18:09 +0200, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
Hi,
Martijn Faassen asked about the current status of this issue.
My local status was that I added a lot more code than I already posted
and was experimenting with different approaches, then started to
concentrate on the streaming
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 11:53 +0200, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
I'll attach an initial code for a wrapper unlink function. The main
I did not. Here it is.
Kasimier
/*
* xmlTreeEnsureXMLDecl:
* @doc: the doc
*
* Ensures that there is an XML namespace declaration on the doc.
*
* Returns the XML ns
Hi,
we adjusted the XS processor to be able to parse the
Schema for Schema (S4S) [1], but there remains a problem described
in [2]. The S4S is needed e.g. for the XSLT 2.0 schema [3], which
imports the S4S.
It would be great if someone could spare some resources to
analyse/fix the problem. The
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 04:37 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 05:05:43PM -0700, Yong Chen (yongche) wrote:
Thanks Daniel. I just re-subscribed to the list. (I subscribed to the list
before, but somehow it didn't work out).
What I'm looking for is something
Hi,
the XML Schema processor has been changed to be able to work
in streaming mode. No public API has been added yet to use
it on streams - but should be available soon. We intend to support
SAX2- and XMLReader-driven validation.
The XS test suite has been updated to work on the latest tests
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 10:24 +0200, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 19:19 +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
I'm getting some validation errors with an XML schema containing the
following:
any namespace=##other processContents=strict/
The errors
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 09:45 +0200, Morten W. J. wrote:
[...]
2. Is there a way to copule a attribute definition together with a element
declaration? That is, i would like to define that element node must have
attribute type with a value from a enumeration, and depending on the value
Hi,
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 18:09 +0200, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
p2 xmlns=urn:test:ZZZ
xmlns:default1=urn:test:AAA
xmlns:default2=urn:test:BBB/
default1:a /
default2:b /
/p2
Correction, this should be:
p2 xmlns=urn:test:ZZZ xmlns:default1=urn:test:AAA/
default1
Hi,
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 18:16 +0200, GUY Fabrice wrote:
Hi,
I have this schema :
?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1?
xsd:schema xmlns:xsd=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema;
xsd:element name=ELEMENTS
xsd:simpleType
xsd:union
xsd:simpleType
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 18:52 -0400, Rob Richards wrote:
Rob
I noticed that xmlReconciliateNs will break ns-wellformedness
in the following case:
a1
a2 xmlns:foo=urn:test:mine
foo:a3/
/a2
/a
if attached to:
p xmlns:bar=urn:test:mine/
we get:
p xmlns:bar=urn:test:mine
a1
a2
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 16:59 +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
[...]
Yeah, I read some of the message on your lxml list about your mechanism
to keep detached nodes alive if they are referenced by multiple wrapper
proxies. We took a sometimes memory-consuming
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 18:12 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Time for a next step.
I attached the current sketch of an adopting mechanism. It's not
tested - just compiles.
It includes an initial on-the-fly reconciliation mechanism which
could be adjusted for different purposes per
Hi,
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 09:03 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 01:27:22PM +0200, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 18:12 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Time for a next step.
I attached the current sketch of an adopting mechanism. It's
Hi,
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 17:16 +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
[snip stuff that goes over his head without a lot of further study]
This is just a cheerleading note; I'm really glad you guys are taking
this up, as I can already see there are many subtle issues
Hi,
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 20:37 +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hey,
Replying to myself:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
[snip]
But now I wonder: does this only apply to attribute nodes, or also to
element nodes which are in a subtree? Testing this.. Ugh, yes, it does.
When I move a
Hi,
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 21:00 +0200, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
[...]
An example (in Delphi code):
(all vars are interfaces here, not objects)
var
doc: IDOMDocument;
elem: IDOMElement;
node: IDOMNode;
begin
elem := doc.documentElement;
// Remove and put on garbage list
Hi,
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 19:47 +0200, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 12:43 -0400, Rob Richards wrote:
I's not about declaring, not about _storing_. It could be _stored_ on
Correction, I'm getting a bit sleepy it seems, this should read:
I's not about declaring, it's
Hi,
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 13:31 +0200, GUY Fabrice wrote:
Hi,
I have this schema :
?xml version=1.0 encoding=ISO-8859-1?
xsd:schema xmlns:xsd=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema;
xsd:element name=element type=xsd:token/
/xsd:schema
And for example the xml file :
?xml version=1.0
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 01:20 -0700, Manoj Kumar wrote:
Hello everyone,
we have a multithreaded application. When we try call the xmlParseFile
function from the subthreads the call fails with segmentation fault.
However the call succeeds if done from the main thread.
Can anybody
Hi,
there was a memory leak (potentially big) in the XML Schema processor,
which occurred in conjunction with identity-constraints and attributes.
I recommend using the latest CVS revision (1.129) of xmlschemas.c.
Regards,
Kasimier
___
xml mailing
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 00:19 -0400, G A ONURAL wrote:
I am using the default in one of my complex type definitions in my
xsd, as shown in the snippet below. How can I get the value of the
default when I parse the xml document (written against my schema) ?
Assuming that the instance
Hi,
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
Matthew Burgess wrote:
a) When presented with this, our typical user is unlikely to
understand what a 'simple type' or 'facet' are, nor would they be
able to change the affected schema even if they did understand it.
Hmm, if they don't
Hi,
GUY Fabrice wrote:
Hi,
I don't know if it's in the TODO list or if it's a bug, but IDREF (and
IDREFS) are not validated using xmlSchema or RelaxNG : if an IDREF
attribute has a value which is not carried by an ID attribute, the
document still validates.
I can provide a test case if you want
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
