Re: [Xournal-devel] Dev status and how-to start?

2013-11-21 Thread Torsten Wagner
Hi, Thanks I compiled the branch including the sidebar thumbnail previews. It works very well. I adjusted the thumbnail size in the source code, to make the Beamer slides easier to read. Luckily there was already a constant defined for scaling :) Furthermore, I added a little hack to

Re: [Xournal-devel] Dev status and how-to start?

2013-11-21 Thread dmg
Great, I think that these features should be integrated into xournal-next, but they have to be split into the different features and reviewed. I know they have bugs (it has crashed on me). Here is the list of features, they are all implemented in andrey's repo: 1. Update the glade

Re: [Xournal-devel] Dev status and how-to start?

2013-11-19 Thread dmg
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:01 AM, D M German d...@uvic.ca wrote: Torsten 2. Create someting more smart based on xournal, which takes care of Torsten the right values. I could think of a little program which allows you Torsten to draw a rectangle (similar like a screenshot program) and the

Re: [Xournal-devel] Dev status and how-to start?

2013-11-18 Thread D M German
I would like my $0.02, adding to what has been said. Denis Auroux twisted the bytes to say: Denis There are basically two different things: xournal, and xournal++ Denis (xournalpp). Denis Xournal was written in C using GTK2. Its code base is stable, but is Denis not evolving very fast

Re: [Xournal-devel] Dev status and how-to start?

2013-11-18 Thread D M German
Wilson Xournalpp is written in C++ while Xournal is written in C :) They are very Wilson different code-wise. In terms of feature sets, I'm not sure what the Wilson current state of Xournal is feature-wise and how far it's gone since hi Wilson I downloaded xournapp and tried to compile it

Re: [Xournal-devel] Dev status and how-to start?

2013-11-18 Thread Wilson Brenna
Hi Daniel, I think that's probably because Ubuntu 13.10 has a new version of poppler and so it needs the addpoppler hack because newer poppler packages don't include the header files xournalpp uses. If you checkout the addpoppler branch and compile that, hopefully that will work (sometimes

Re: [Xournal-devel] Dev status and how-to start?

2013-11-18 Thread Shuhao Wu
So yeah that's what I figured as well. It seems like everyone has their own fork. While that seems to be beauty of opensource, this is just confusing and bad for the end users. There are a lot of improvements that could be made to xournal, a lot of which are already implemented. We should really

Re: [Xournal-devel] Dev status and how-to start?

2013-11-17 Thread Wilson Brenna
Xournalpp is written in C++ while Xournal is written in C :) They are very different code-wise. In terms of feature sets, I'm not sure what the current state of Xournal is feature-wise and how far it's gone since Xournalpp was started. The last Xournal release I used was the one packaged with

Re: [Xournal-devel] Dev status and how-to start?

2013-11-17 Thread Denis Auroux
Hi all, I am looking into the development of xournal for some time and got a bit confused. There is a C++ branch which seems to get some but not much work at the moment. There is a SVN and a GIT. In the GIT there seems to be a GTK3 branch. Some Github forks exists as well. There are