Any way to edit a tag?

2008-05-05 Thread dsm101
Okay, I remembered that there was a window somewhere with a list of  
tags, and I dug around it and found it in preferences. So if I were to  
create a tag for each project, I could view the list of projects here.  
Seems a little odd but I could get used to that.


But in that case I'd like to be able to add a prefix to a tag as soon  
as the project is completed, to drop it to the bottom of that list and  
keep only the active projects on top. Is there a way to edit a tag  
once you've created it so that it will be changed everywhere? Or would  
I have to type the new tag and delete the old one for every note?


Scott Marley

--
--
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
 the mailing list yojimbo-talk@barebones.com.
To unsubscribe, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List archives:  http://www.listsearch.com/yojimbotalk.lasso
Have a feature request, or not sure if the software's working 
correctly? Please send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: The Real Issue With Nested Folders and Multiple Databases.

2008-05-05 Thread Paulo Diniz
Great discussion here, I'm pretty sure that it isn't the purpose of the
list, but i think it`s important to discuss organization methods. Like said
below, we're so busy most of the time dealing with what is given to us (a
third of the time, or whatever) and also actually DOING stuff, that we don't
take the time to step back and think outside of the box on what's really
needed to sort the mess of our lives.

I, for one, am still searching for my ultimate system, and have, in the
past, written drafts/specs of an ideal organization software. Those drafts
are availiable at:

http://notariussystem.blogspot.com/

My most recent post (the only recent post, that is) offers a good abstract
of what i'm searching for. If anyone is interested enough, please take a
look on it. As time goes, i plan to detail it further.

Cheers,

-Paulo

On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Luis Roca [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Keith
 I'm not getting a sense that your sincerely happy for me. Maybe I'm just
 a little insecure. I don't know but this is neither the time or the
 place for that discussion. : )

 Scott responded to this but since you directed it at me it's only fair
 that I give you an answer. I N-E-V-E-R said I use or would suggest to
 use Yojimbo as a total GTD tool. There is NO total GTD tool, not
 OmniFocus, not Things, not kGTD, not Entourage, etc. You're right
 Yojimbo is part of my system (the archive). That's all any piece of
 software can hope to be, a part of a complete system. This is
 repeated throughout the book beginning in the preface.

 There are people on this list that use Yojimbo as their primary process
 and review tool within their daily GTDing. I'm honestly not sure how
 effective it can be over a long period of time but I'd love to hear more
 about it.

  Everything else ends up in the *correct* folder.
 
  There is such a thing as the *correct* folder  as there are such
  things as objective hierarchies -- ones which capture real
  relationships between things. You can think of genus-species
  groupings in biology, or project-file groupings in your work. Where
  such groupings exist, a hierarchical file structure has real value,
  but they take some thinking about to be stable/valuable-- which is
  why the profession of 'librarian' exists for one.

 Carlton,
 You make excellent points and I find it interesting that you're using
 Yojimbo as an inbox where you go back to identify/process the
 information at a later date. It's much different than how I use it and
 seems like a solid system. You hit at the initial point that I was
 trying to make which was the importance of the initial identification
 process of a digital asset.

 I do have to respectfully disagree with the idea of a *correct* folder.
 I'm not saying it doesn't exist or can't be part of a larger
 organizational system. I just think this method can easily (and often
 does) break down when a second user is introduced to the system.

 Everyone on this list has probably had the uncomfortable sensation of
 starting a new job and being welcomed with a new folder structure to
 learn. Your'e at the mercy of whoever decided on the file and folder
 naming structure (Who may not even be with the company anymore).
 Tags,notes/comments, saved searches, etc. offer a solution that tech
 savy librarians and information architects have been promoting recently.
(*See : Ambient Findability by Peter Morville and
Keeping Found Things Found by William Jones)

 Anyone and everyone can name an item without stepping on your coworker
 or boss' toes. You name an item in a meaningful way to you, and others
 get to do the same. A new employee can find a file in a shorter period
 of time and without having to shamefully ask her cubicle mate when
 searching for file 03.5248-Financials.doc that's buried in a seven level
 folder structure on the external corporate database.

 I've read that the average professional spends a third of their week
 looking for information that they have previously encountered! So as
 well as folders have worked for some people, more fluid systems need to
 be put in place for the rest of us.

 I've helped turn this into exactly what I didn't want
 - The Continuing Saga of Nested Folders -
 It ends here!
 : ) Luis

 --
 --
 This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list yojimbo-talk@barebones.com.
 To unsubscribe, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 List archives:  http://www.listsearch.com/yojimbotalk.lasso
 Have a feature request, or not sure if the software's working
 correctly? Please send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Read only entries

2008-05-05 Thread Verdon Vaillancourt

On 5-May-08, at 7:23 AM, Lawrence J Winkler wrote:


I would like the flexibiity to make entries read-only: a toggle Read-
Only/Edit -- no password to toggle from one to the other state.  Just
something to protect my entries from me.


I'll second and third that. It would be hugely beneficial to me!

verdon


--
--
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
 the mailing list yojimbo-talk@barebones.com.
To unsubscribe, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List archives:  http://www.listsearch.com/yojimbotalk.lasso
Have a feature request, or not sure if the software's working 
correctly? Please send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Yet another mostly happy user

2008-05-05 Thread Claude
I agree completely with your mail. Sometimes I am afraid to forget  
some items because I don't remember all the tags' name. I really need  
tags and folders.
I try Eaglefiler (nested folders AND tags) : it tastes like Yojimbo,  
but it is not Yojimbo - but looks fine too.

And I am still an almost happy user !

Claude


Le 5 mai 08 à 14:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :

I'm another mostly happy Yojimbo user who would be even happier with  
nested folders. Well, that and being able to sync my notes to my  
iPhone -- hopefully that will come soon enough.

...


--
--
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
 the mailing list yojimbo-talk@barebones.com.
To unsubscribe, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List archives:  http://www.listsearch.com/yojimbotalk.lasso
Have a feature request, or not sure if the software's working
correctly? Please send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Yet another mostly happy user

2008-05-05 Thread Steve Kalkwarf
I agree completely with your mail. Sometimes I am afraid to 
forget some items because I don't remember all the tags' name. 
I really need tags and folders.
I try Eaglefiler (nested folders AND tags) : it tastes like 
Yojimbo, but it is not Yojimbo - but looks fine too.


I've seen several people mention that they are afraid if they 
forget a tag, they'll lose an item. I don't understand.


Both Tags and Collections are aids in retrieving items. They are 
not the only way to retreive an item: They provide additional 
context for the item so that you can find it more easily.


I typically search for the content or title of an item when I 
want to fetch a specific item.


I have a small number of Collections present that remind me 
there are things I need to work on, containing tagged and 
untagged items related to that task.


I have a slightly larger number of Tag Collections defined. I 
use these to A) visually group items together for a specific 
task, or B) invert a relationship so I can see things by their 
Tag instead of trying to remember all the items.


But most of my items just live in the Library. I hate organizing.

Steve



--
--
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
 the mailing list yojimbo-talk@barebones.com.
To unsubscribe, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List archives:  http://www.listsearch.com/yojimbotalk.lasso
Have a feature request, or not sure if the software's working
correctly? Please send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Tag Collections not treated the same as 'regular' Collections (was: The Real Issue With Nested Folders and Multiple Databases.)

2008-05-05 Thread david
Bill - good question  and the answer becomes more complex as our  
ability to search on tags becomes more complex. A tag collection with  
one tag item or a multiple search involving AND it would be pretty  
easy to alert the user to the definition and offer to append the  
collection tags, change the dropped items to have those tags, or  
cancel. But if the tag collection involves an OR search all bets are  
off.


david

On May 5, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Bill Rowe wrote:


On 5/5/08 at 7:23 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paulo Diniz) wrote:


I think that it would be natural to expect either that if you drag
an item into a tag collection, it would be automatically tagged as
to fit in that collection.


What would happen if the tag collection had several tags associated  
with it? Would you assign all of the available tags to an item  
dragged to that collection? This certainly wouldn't be what I would  
want in general. And if you don't have all of the tags assigned to  
the dragged item, how would you have Yojimbo decide which tags to  
assign to the item?


I believe there are good reasons for not having tags automatically  
assigned.


--
--
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list yojimbo-talk@barebones.com.
To unsubscribe, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List archives:  http://www.listsearch.com/yojimbotalk.lasso
Have a feature request, or not sure if the software's working
correctly? Please send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
--
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
 the mailing list yojimbo-talk@barebones.com.
To unsubscribe, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List archives:  http://www.listsearch.com/yojimbotalk.lasso
Have a feature request, or not sure if the software's working 
correctly? Please send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Tag Collections not treated the same as 'regular' Collections (was: The Real Issue With Nested Folders and Multiple Databases.)

2008-05-05 Thread infrahile

On 5 May 2008, at 16:45, Bill Rowe wrote:
What would happen if the tag collection had several tags associated  
with it? Would you assign all of the available tags to an item  
dragged to that collection?



That's exactly what I'd expect it to do, I don't see what the problem  
is. For example, I have a number of web archives currently tagged with  
'article' 'to read' and 'projectname'  - when I've read one I'll  
delete it's 'to read' tag and when 'projectname' is over I'll delete  
that tag too leaving me with 'article' and whatever other descriptives  
I've given it. Being able to add those first three tags in one shot  
would be a nice little timesaver.


Cheers, T.

--
--
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
 the mailing list yojimbo-talk@barebones.com.
To unsubscribe, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List archives:  http://www.listsearch.com/yojimbotalk.lasso
Have a feature request, or not sure if the software's working 
correctly? Please send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: I use Yojimbo for..

2008-05-05 Thread Sean Chou
This is a great idea! I've always wondered how folks use Yojimbo and
approach data management in general. Although we all have our pet
requests, I'm sure the vast majority of us incorporated deeply into
our workflow.

For me, data management falls into one of the following (constantly
shifting as I try to improve and products come along/get better)
buckets (in order of preference):

TaskPaper (tagged for context) - for all tasks

Yojimbo (heavily tagged) - for all loose text, code snippets, most
PDFs, images that don't go into iPhoto, serials, passwords, lately
also important emails

iPhoto (heavily tagged) - for all personal photos, wallpaper, screen
captures (other than a single screen shot which goes into Yojimbo
now), personal videos

iTunes (heavily categorized, clean metadata - tag like) - for all
music and 3rd party videos

File system (half heartedly tagged) - for files that don't go into
Yojimbo (mostly presentations, Word, Xmind, source code, , PDFs that
just seem too large, PDFs that are commented

Entourage - for email and most attachments

What I've found is that I'd love to just shove most things into
Yojimbo for the sake of being able to find all things related to a tag
or union/intersection of tags, but realize that would look
suspiciously like a file manager. Leap may work well except it doesn't
seem to interact with Yojimbo.

I also often wonder how others use the features of Yojimbo to help
with their workflow. Between tags, folders, labels, flags, and
comments, there are a plethora of approaches. Yet Yojimbo, perhaps due
to the discipline of the Bare Bones team, remains aesthetically
pleasing. IMO, EagleFiler is a bit cluttery and Together just doesn't
quite flow right (although I do like it a lot). Personally, I think
Evernote is the most promising up and comer.

Anyway, to get back to my Yojimbo system:

Tags - categorizes the data (and sometimes, why I'm storing it -
howto, reference, etc.)

Flags - for things I'm actively working on or need to otherwise pay attention to

Folders - for organizing data against a project (i.e. research for an
essay or presentation)

Comments - comments about the data usually the source if other than my work

Labels - I've had the toughest time here because I originally wanted
to use it for why I'm storing it but it hasn't stuck for some
reason. I think the colors are too much when used too liberally. I
guess I don't really use labels much.

Information gets captured via a shortcut key and the input panel (I
dislike the drop dock and have disabled them) or a capture script (for
things like capturing from Entourage or Safari). I tag it, add a
source comment if needed, and flag it if appropriate.

Then I periodically go through, retagging, deleting, and otherwise
sorting/shuffling. Rinse. Repeat.

On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Luis Roca
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I want to start a positive thread on what interesting things everyone
   uses Yojimbo for.. Maybe everyone could post one interesting thing
   they use the application for, we all might find some new uses..
=

-- 
--
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list yojimbo-talk@barebones.com.
To unsubscribe, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List archives:  http://www.listsearch.com/yojimbotalk.lasso
Have a feature request, or not sure if the software's working 
correctly? Please send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Yet another mostly happy user

2008-05-05 Thread Luis Roca
Scott M.
I have to say your use of Yojimbo as an everyday GTD tool is pretty
impressive. Just the ambition to try and use it that way is impressive.
I don’t really see that as the purpose of Yojimbo. (It’s really just
considered an archival application.) That doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be
used to do other creative things. I just find that using it as a central
GTD application can be difficult at best. I also don’t think very highly
of the majority of project planner/GTD applications so take that into
consideration.

I read and re-read your post. I find your system impressive but very
confusing to me. (Which is ok because it’s YOUR system. As long as it
works for you.) I’ve never been fully comfortable with the directory
method of organizing information. The reason I was so drawn to Yojimbo
was because it thinks the way I do. (In a much more contextual manner.)

You’re definitely not alone in your hesitance to use tags. David said
this weekend that humans are spacial thinkers. Which is why stuffing
things into an established hierarchy makes more sense than tags. While
it’s true that - some - people are spacial thinkers, there are also
people who are relational, oral, experiential, and a number of other
types of thinkers.

Tags, tag collections, smart folders, labels, and comments all offer the
ability to create multiple contexts and I really like that. That’s how
Yojimbo was designed to organize information. I realize it’s not for
everyone (apparently not the spacial thinkers) but they have a whole lot
of options out there to suit there needs perfectly well.

Carlton,
You've inspired me. I'm planning a trip to the 
Bronx Zoo in the next few weeks. : )

Luis


--
--
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list yojimbo-talk@barebones.com.
To unsubscribe, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List archives:  http://www.listsearch.com/yojimbotalk.lasso
Have a feature request, or not sure if the software's working
correctly? Please send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Tag Collections not treated the same as 'regular' Collections

2008-05-05 Thread Luis Roca
I like this idea alot.

 I think that it would be natural to expect either that if you drag an
item
 into a tag collection, it would be automatically tagged as to fit in
that
 collection.

--
--
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list yojimbo-talk@barebones.com.
To unsubscribe, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List archives:  http://www.listsearch.com/yojimbotalk.lasso
Have a feature request, or not sure if the software's working
correctly? Please send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Yet another mostly happy user

2008-05-05 Thread cubic . archon
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Luis Roca
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  You're definitely not alone in your hesitance to use tags. David said
  this weekend that humans are spacial thinkers. Which is why stuffing
  things into an established hierarchy makes more sense than tags. While
  it's true that - some - people are spacial thinkers, there are also
  people who are relational, oral, experiential, and a number of other
  types of thinkers.

Of course, even being a spatial thinker can mean a lot of things. I
consider myself in that category, but I love tags - I visualise tagged
items as objects in Venn diagram sets.

-- 
--
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list yojimbo-talk@barebones.com.
To unsubscribe, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List archives:  http://www.listsearch.com/yojimbotalk.lasso
Have a feature request, or not sure if the software's working 
correctly? Please send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: I use Yojimbo for..

2008-05-05 Thread cubic . archon
My system keeps changing, but at the moment...

Folders - I maintain very broad categories of folder, which are really
only used for the drop box panel. They correspond to the answer to the
question why am I storing this? Is it for future reference, research
material to be examined later, a random thought I've had myself, or an
asset that I am trying to create for use elsewhere (e.g. a piece of
documentation)? Sometimes if I'm doing an awful lot of dragging and
dropping from Safari I'll set up a temporary folder for a project, but
I'll tag the contents and delete the folder afterwards.

Tags - most of the classification is done with tags. Material for an
individual project is defined by a combination of one or more tags,
and for all of the current ones, there's a tag folder, prefixed by .
so that they all go to the top of the list. I used to file projects in
folders, but when you delete a folder you can never find out what was
in it again, and I can never tell when I might need to look at an old
project once more.

(I find it useful to maintain a list of the tags that get applied to
individual projects - I've been experimenting with prefixing all
project code tags with p., but it's not proved worth it yet.)

Oh, there are also tag folders for todo and idea, though I do most
of my task management with Todoist or Taskpaper. todo tagged items
are usually reference data which won't fit anywhere else.

Flags - a flagged item is just one I can get to with the Flagged
Items list. It doesn't mean anything more than I use this a lot or
I should pay attention to this - if I findmyself looking for that
item a lot, I'll flag it, if I find I'm not, I'll remove the flag.

Labels - I don't really use these a lot except as decoration. There
may be a good way to use them - they've got the advantage of being
very visually distinctive - but if there is one I don't know what it
is. Also, they're a bit hard to export if it ever comes down to that.

-- 
--
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list yojimbo-talk@barebones.com.
To unsubscribe, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List archives:  http://www.listsearch.com/yojimbotalk.lasso
Have a feature request, or not sure if the software's working 
correctly? Please send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Yet another mostly happy user

2008-05-05 Thread Carlton Gibson


On 5 May 2008, at 18:00, Luis Roca wrote:


Carlton,
You've inspired me. I'm planning a trip to the
Bronx Zoo in the next few weeks. : )



Glad to be of service. Have fun! :-)

C

--
--
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
 the mailing list yojimbo-talk@barebones.com.
To unsubscribe, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List archives:  http://www.listsearch.com/yojimbotalk.lasso
Have a feature request, or not sure if the software's working 
correctly? Please send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]