On 6/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never really struck me as a valid explanation, this question of rights.
My
understanding of copyright is that anybody can cover anybody else's songs as
long as
the proper royalties are paid, where applicable. This was further
I'd be willing to bet that it was released because FZ could purchase the
rights to do so, unlike the Texas Motel Medley where he couldn't. I know that
some of the US releases of that tour were slightly different from the UK and
world releases because acquiring the rights to some tunes.
, June 12, 2006 6:08 PMTo:
Zappa-List@yahoogroups.comSubject: [Zappa-List]
Stairway
Just been reading the latest edition of the UK music/movies magazine Uncut
which this month has a retrospective article on Led Zep 4.It got
me thinking as to why Frank decided to cover STH on
I'm sure that the 2 most important reasons for playing
STH were that in was 1) Fun and 2) Funny. What else
matters? Frank had nothing else to prove.
rh
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/12/06 12:11:31 PM Eastern
Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just been reading the
t@yahoogroups.comSent: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 22:55:32 -0400Subject: Re: [Zappa-List] Stairway
As for the WHY of ultimately deciding to play it (and release it on album), I'm not really sure.
--Milhouse
I'd be willing to bet that it was released because FZ could purchase the rights to do so, unlik
: [Zappa-List] Stairway
Never really struck me as a valid
explanation, thisquestion of rights. My understanding
of copyright is that anybody can cover anybody else's songs as long as the
proper royalties are paid, where applicable. This was further expanded
back in the eighties when 2
In a message dated 6/13/06 5:27:49 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Never really struck me as a valid explanation, thisquestion of "rights". My understanding of copyright is that anybody can cover anybody else's songs as long as the proper royalties are paid, where
Just been reading the latest edition of the UK music/movies magazine Uncut
which this month has a retrospective article on Led Zep 4.
It got me thinking as to why Frank decided to cover STH on the 88 tour ?
I don't think I've ever seen an explanation of thiswas it to show
how clever he
In a message dated 6/12/06 12:11:31 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just been reading the latest edition of the UK music/movies magazine Uncut which this month has a retrospective article on Led Zep 4.It got me thinking as to why Frank decided to cover STH on the 88
As for the WHY of ultimately deciding to play it (and release it on album),
I'm not really sure.
--Milhouse
I'd be willing to bet that it was released because FZ could purchase the
rights to do so, unlike the Texas Motel Medley where he couldn't. I know that
some of the US releases of
10 matches
Mail list logo
