On 6/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Never really struck me as a valid explanation, this question of rights.
My
understanding of copyright is that anybody can cover anybody else's songs as
long as
the proper royalties are paid, where applicable. This was further
I'd be willing to bet that it was released because FZ could purchase the
rights to do so, unlike the Texas Motel Medley where he couldn't. I know that
some of the US releases of that tour were slightly different from the UK and
world releases because acquiring the rights to some tunes.
I really don't know why Frank decided to include STH,
but according to Mike Keneally, the idea for the solo was not
Frank's...
...me
and Paul Carman launching into Jimmy Page's "Stairway" solo in unison without
telling Frank we were going to (he'd been playing an improvised solo in
I'm sure that the 2 most important reasons for playing
STH were that in was 1) Fun and 2) Funny. What else
matters? Frank had nothing else to prove.
rh
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/12/06 12:11:31 PM Eastern
Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just been reading the
t@yahoogroups.comSent: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 22:55:32 -0400Subject: Re: [Zappa-List] Stairway
As for the WHY of ultimately deciding to play it (and release it on album), I'm not really sure.
--Milhouse
I'd be willing to bet that it was released because FZ could purchase the rights to do so, unlik
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Zappa-List@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 22:55:32 -0400
Subject: Re: [Zappa-List] Stairway
As for the WHY of ultimately deciding to play it (and
release it on album), I'm not really sure.
--Milhouse
I'd be willing to bet
In a message dated 6/13/06 5:27:49 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Never really struck me as a valid explanation, thisquestion of "rights". My understanding of copyright is that anybody can cover anybody else's songs as long as the proper royalties are paid, where
In a message dated 6/12/06 12:11:31 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just been reading the latest edition of the UK music/movies magazine Uncut which this month has a retrospective article on Led Zep 4.It got me thinking as to why Frank decided to cover STH on the 88
As for the WHY of ultimately deciding to play it (and release it on album),
I'm not really sure.
--Milhouse
I'd be willing to bet that it was released because FZ could purchase the
rights to do so, unlike the Texas Motel Medley where he couldn't. I know that
some of the US releases of
