Hey everyone,
I recently have been having some doubts about ZB, which I would prefer
not to be having, but I wanted to bring them up.
I recently met with Dan Knights and asked him what he thought about
ZB. His response was, for the most part, that it seemed like a good
method but that recognitio
Hm...
Whenever I do an average of 500, I either learn
something new (small f2l trick or trigger), and I
almost always break some kind of record in a category
(average of 100, average of 10, single, the avg of
500, or something, etc.). When I do these long
sessions (in a single sitting or 2), I lea
Hey everyone,
After reading Brent's last post I decided to really start refining my
recognition. What I have been doing is to do transformation solves,
but only allow myself to see two sides to recognize the ZBLL. I do
not allow AUF (adjust U face) turns either. It sometimes takes me as
much as
I haven't actually thought about it too much.
However I would like to point out that the S-Orientation cases and
the Pi-Orientation cases are so rediculously hard to recognize... T-
Orientation recognition is a breeze for me now, as are many of the L-
Orientation (*with CP*).
The recogniton diff
In reply to all:
I think this is the dilemma: Fridrich, while averaging more moves and
having less potential for speed with full mastery, is much, much
easier to implement. It is a simple and efficient solution.
ZB averages far fewer moves, but has the nasty side effect of
incredibly difficult
--- In zbmethod@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Again, just some thoughts, but I'm fairly convinced full ZB will be
> too difficult to recognize under pressure consistently, at least
> without years and years of practice.
This is something I agree with. That is why I
Well, I am still quite new to learning ZB and I have not even begun to
learn ZBLL, but for ZBF2L, it seems very very easy. I still get some
amnesia, but the ZBF2L I have learned so far (just under 50%) has been
quite easy to learn (both learning algs and recognition). I think
with enough practice
On 11/22/05, cmhardw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm at a dilemma. I have been talking with lots of people about
Fridrich after the 2005RWC and have found lots of really useful ways
to drop my average. I even think now that I could get sub-15 with
Fridrich were I to just implement all the ch
>
> What changes do you need to implement with Fridrich?
>
Hey David,
I've been thinking about a number of things. Here are the ones I
want to learn most
1) go fast-fast
- Though people advocate slow-fast, I think for 15.xx and faster
times you have to just go really really fast. I've only
