On 1/11/07, Andy Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jon Smirl wrote:
>
> > If you send UDP packets out on a multicast (or broadcast address)
> > under 802.11 there is no MAC level ACK. UDP packets never have TCP
> > level ACKs.
> >
> > So the question is, if an 802.11 device is associated to an AP,
Jon Smirl wrote:
> If you send UDP packets out on a multicast (or broadcast address)
> under 802.11 there is no MAC level ACK. UDP packets never have TCP
> level ACKs.
>
> So the question is, if an 802.11 device is associated to an AP, can
> you use the existing API to send out packets with a NUL
On 1/10/07, Andy Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jon Smirl wrote:
>
> Hi Jon -
>
> >> The intended effect is that you can simultaneously run your encrypted
> >> network connection, keeping your normal traffic and internet
> >> connectivity private as usual, and yet also participate in a general,
Jon Smirl wrote:
Hi Jon -
>> The intended effect is that you can simultaneously run your encrypted
>> network connection, keeping your normal traffic and internet
>> connectivity private as usual, and yet also participate in a general,
>> unencrypted (on the transport layer, anyway) broadcast-bas
On 1/10/07, Andy Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks -
>
> I have written a patch (attached) which tries to provide a new usage
> mode for the zd1211rw. It works for me, but only in Monitor mode: the
> intention is that it should work in Managed mode too, associated or
> unassociated, and
Hi folks -
I have written a patch (attached) which tries to provide a new usage
mode for the zd1211rw. It works for me, but only in Monitor mode: the
intention is that it should work in Managed mode too, associated or
unassociated, and I welcome any pointers getting that going.
What the pat
