Michael Buesch wrote:
> I think the real question is: What does this "band edge" bit actually do?
Not entirely sure, and I don't think we've even seen a device where this
code path runs (it only runs if a certain bit is set in the EEPROM).
However, considering that this looks like it plays with
The patch was based off the FIXME comment in the code [which suggested
replacing 11 with the boundary for the regulatory domain]. I'll take a
look at the vendors driver and see about modifying the patch to fit
more with its logic or just limmiting it to the FCC regulatory domain.
On 10/30/06, Uli
Johannes Berg wrote:
>> I'm not so sure about this. This patching might be US-specific and we
>> cannot simply apply the setting for top channel of another domain
>> instead of channel 11. One option would be to set the value only under
>> the US regulatory domain.
>
> ??
> What the patch does
Daniel Drake wrote:
> Holden Karau wrote:
>> I've changed the patch based on your suggestions :-)
>
> Thanks, looks fine. Let's just wait for an OK from Ulrich, then you can
> send it to John, without broken tabs/lines, with signoff and description.
>
> Daniel
I'm not so sure about this. This p
Holden Karau wrote:
> I've changed the patch based on your suggestions :-)
Thanks, looks fine. Let's just wait for an OK from Ulrich, then you can
send it to John, without broken tabs/lines, with signoff and description.
Daniel
-
Holden Karau wrote:
> From: Holden Karau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.holdenkarau.com
>
> I have made a small patch for the zd1211rw driver which uses the
> boundry channels of the regulatory domain, rather than the hard coded
> values of 1 & 11.
> Signed-off-by: Holden Karau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
