On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:48 AM, john skaller
skal...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
I observe 0MQ is seriously lacking in regression tests.
The above procedure should fix that.
I'm not going to respond to your post, it's far too long and you are
making too many wild arguments in one thread. Is
On 19/03/2012, at 5:08 PM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:48 AM, john skaller
skal...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
I observe 0MQ is seriously lacking in regression tests.
The above procedure should fix that.
I'm not going to respond to your post, it's far too long and
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:29 AM, john skaller
skal...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
C4 is a single document, I just put all the issues in one document too :)
You asked for feedback, I gave it.
Since you're irritated I will cease commenting.
To be accurate you send a torrent of comments
Hi,
I have a question, in my application which is a multithreaded process, I am
using inproc protocol to communicate between the process.
I have observed after every new user thread creation 2 more new zmq threads are
getting created but when user thread is dying this zmq thread is still there
Hi ,
Is there any one who can help me on this ??
Regards,
Ronald
From: proj_symb...@live.com
To: zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 19:44:15 +0530
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] FW: Help With Regard To the ZMQ Forwarder
Hello Cornelius,
Thanks and that worked well
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Symbian Projects
proj_symb...@live.com wrote:
Is there any one who can help me on this ??
This thread started focusing signal handling versus your messaging
code. If it was working and now is not, clearly you changed something
that created this behaviour. Look
Hello Justin,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
Yes i remember for what the thread was started, and that time my forwarder was
running great without any problem. I was able to send and receive messages
between my publisher and subscribers.
Than i added the signals to clean the sockets.
After
Hello Again :)
Dunno if i should open a new topic but here it goes.
During a test i found a small problem :)
The same client server model. Imagine using REQ the client asks something
from the server.
The message exits the client and arrives at the server while it's under
processing ( on the
You should audit your code for calls to zmq_init(). I would guess that each new
user thread is calling that function which is unnecessary. You only need to
call zmq_init() once *per process.*
cr
On Mar 19, 2012, at 4:49 AM, Zafar Iqbal wrote:
Hi,
I have a question, in my application which
On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:10 AM, Antonio Teixeira wrote:
Hello Again :)
Dunno if i should open a new topic but here it goes.
During a test i found a small problem :)
The same client server model. Imagine using REQ the client asks something
from the server.
The message exits the client and
The performance is problematic
https://github.com/JustinTulloss/zeromq.node/issues/83
--CM
-Original Message-
From: zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org
[mailto:zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org] On Behalf Of Ilya Dmitrichenko
Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2012 12:58 PM
To: ZeroMQ
On 19 March 2012 13:52, Christian Martinez ch...@microsoft.com wrote:
The performance is problematic
https://github.com/JustinTulloss/zeromq.node/issues/83
I see, not good news ;(
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
Hello Chuck , this is correct.
But i can imagine that during the work processing if the server goes off
line ( no response) will block the client on recv () ?
Regards
A/T
2012/3/19 Chuck Remes cremes.devl...@mac.com
On Mar 19, 2012, at 6:10 AM, Antonio Teixeira wrote:
Hello Again :)
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Antonio Teixeira
eagle.anto...@gmail.com wrote:
But i can imagine that during the work processing if the server goes off
line ( no response) will block the client on recv () ?
Antonio,
You should read the Guide, especially Ch4 which describes how to solve
If the same code with same libraries no longer works then clearly you
have a runtime issue. Have you tried restarting the platforms? Maybe
you should have a look at the order in which things are happening. Are
you subscribing before the messages are sent?
Perhaps its an IP filtering issue. Make
Hello Pieter
Thanks alot i have read the guide but it was on the old website.
Anyway this is if far better in the end is a mix of Poll and socket renewal
, thanks.
Regards
A/T
2012/3/19 Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Antonio Teixeira
eagle.anto...@gmail.com
I want to limit socket internal queue to one message. To do that I call
zmq_setsockopt with second argument set to one right after socket
creation (socket type = PUSH).
I use zlrzmq and I get an exception: Invalid argument. What I'm doing wrong?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Antonio Teixeira
eagle.anto...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks alot i have read the guide but it was on the old website.
Where was that? Do you mean the old introduction on the zeromq.org site?
-Pieter
___
zeromq-dev mailing
19.03.2012 19:40, Boris Gulay пишет:
I want to limit socket internal queue to one message. To do that I call
zmq_setsockopt with second argument set to one right after socket
creation (socket type = PUSH).
I use zlrzmq and I get an exception: Invalid argument. What I'm doing wrong?
I should
I started working with ZMQ on the really really early version so was the
old old guide :)
Anyway Pieter i have everything i need
Paranoid Pirate PatternIs the way to go :)
Thanks
2012/3/19 Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Antonio Teixeira
Boris,
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Boris Gulay bo...@boressoft.ru wrote:
19.03.2012 19:40, Boris Gulay пишет:
I want to limit socket internal queue to one message. To do that I call
zmq_setsockopt with second argument set to one right after socket
creation (socket type = PUSH).
I
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Teixeira
eagle.anto...@gmail.com wrote:
I started working with ZMQ on the really really early version so was the old
old guide :)
Anyway Pieter i have everything i need
Paranoid Pirate Pattern
Is the way to go :)
Great, let us know how it works.
Hello Justin,
Thanks again for reply.
I have tried restarting the platform, and i have also checked it in two
different machines, and in both machine it doesn't work.
I am clue of ideas how to debug this problem as the no of line of code is very
small too.
Is there any way i can
Hmm... Something is very confused in this discussion...
The zeromq.node project and the performance problems there have to do that
projects's Node.js binding with the zeromq libraries. I.e. it doesn't seem to
have much, if anything to do with libuv itself.
John
Ronald,
You can use netstat. You're using windows, right?
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/netstat.mspx?mfr=true
As for debugging your code, can you paste the code into a paste bin or
gist.github?
Try this for instance: https://gist.github.com/
Thanks for your reply cornelius.
I am now using netstat for checking the blocked ports.
Meanwhile i have uploaded the code here https://gist.github.com/2119078
and there is no proprietary code at the moment its the basic code where i am
trying to get the forwarder working.
and your last
From the looks of your code https://gist.github.com/2119078, you define
functions for sending and receiving messages, but you do not call them, like
you do with Forwarder.py.
Also for the sake of easier testing, you may want to have your sender script to
send multiple messages to allow you to
Hi All,
Following this discussion from some time ago, I've created an issue
here: https://zeromq.jira.com/browse/LIBZMQ-337
I see that Crossroads has implemented my suggestion for moving
iothreads out of the context creation call. Nice.
Before we backport that change and make the other API
On Mar 19, 2012, at 4:22 PM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
Hi All,
Following this discussion from some time ago, I've created an issue
here: https://zeromq.jira.com/browse/LIBZMQ-337
I see that Crossroads has implemented my suggestion for moving
iothreads out of the context creation call. Nice.
LinkedIn
Guilherme Ceschiatti Moreira requested to add you as a connection on
LinkedIn:
--
jinjing,
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
- Guilherme Ceschiatti
Accept invitation from Guilherme Ceschiatti
For the Ruby language, I had just set a default value for the io_threads
argument to 1. Most people were just calling Context.new and never even
realized there was an option to override. I think there is value here.
Ditto for clrzmq. This would be easy to refactor into a property on
Context.
OK, thanks for the confirmation. I'm on it...
-Pieter
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Johnny Gozde joh...@jgoz.net wrote:
For the Ruby language, I had just set a default value for the io_threads
argument to 1. Most people were just calling Context.new and never even
realized there was an
Hello Cornelius,
I call those methods explicitly in my interpreter, and i have tried with
sending infinite message too.
Regards,
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:18:59 -0500
From: cornto...@cct.lsu.edu
To: zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] FW: Help With Regard To the ZMQ
Hello Cornelius and Justin,
I was at last able to get my forwarder to work and it was my mistake.
My sender code which was like:
def sendMessage():
context = zmq.Context()
sender = context.socket(zmq.PUB)
sender.bind('tcp://127.0.0.1:5558')
sender.send(This is the sender)
was
34 matches
Mail list logo
