On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Julien Vermillard
> wrote:
>> So let's close this podling.
>
> OK. See http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html for the
> process to follow, including the IPMC vote to make this official.
>
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Julien Vermillard
wrote:
> So let's close this podling.
OK. See http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html for the
process to follow, including the IPMC vote to make this official.
Who'll take care of this cleanup?
BR,
Jukka Zitting
So let's close the vote :
+1 binding : grobmeier, beberlei, derick, jpic, oms, rolandb,
+0 binding : kore, toby
-1 none
So let's close this podling.
Julien
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Julien Vermillard
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Due to the reasons exposed later, and mainly due to lack of activity
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, André Rømcke wrote:
>
> > but don't we need to setup a light organization / project governance
> around
> > this, some people that have a stake in the project and can oversee the
> > github account[, merging pull reques
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, André Rømcke wrote:
> but don't we need to setup a light organization / project governance around
> this, some people that have a stake in the project and can oversee the
> github account[, merging pull requests], github webpages, travis setup and
> potentially also do some re
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Henri Bergius wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Apr 20, 2012 11:26 AM, "Tobias Schlitt" wrote:
> > sadly, I did not find time to look into all this stuff. This also seems
> > the reason that Zeta is dying: Time lack.
> >
> > I'm a bit sad, that Zeta is being closed down, but I
Hi,
Am Freitag, 20. April 2012, 11:25:20 schrieb Tobias Schlitt:
> Hi,
[snip]
> sadly, I did not find time to look into all this stuff. This also seems
> the reason that Zeta is dying: Time lack.
>
> I'm a bit sad, that Zeta is being closed down, but I think that it's the
> logical way to go.
>
I volunteered to do a migration of the code to github.
I will do the following steps:
1. Do a SVN to Git migration for every component on its own. Every
component will have its own repository with issue tracker on Github.
2. Rewrite history to add composer.json files to all stable tags
3. Push to
Hi,
On Apr 20, 2012 11:26 AM, "Tobias Schlitt" wrote:
> sadly, I did not find time to look into all this stuff. This also seems
> the reason that Zeta is dying: Time lack.
>
> I'm a bit sad, that Zeta is being closed down, but I think that it's the
> logical way to go.
I think the important part
Hi,
On 04/13/2012 10:30 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
> Due to the reasons exposed later, and mainly due to lack of activity :
>
>[ ] +1 Retire the Zeta components project and move to another infra
> like github
>[ ] -1 Do not retire the project, because ...
sadly, I did not find time to
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Kore Nordmann wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 10:30 +0200, Julien Vermillard wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Due to the reasons exposed later, and mainly due to lack of activity :
>>
>> [ ] +1 Retire the Zeta components project and move to another infra
>> like github
>>
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 10:30 +0200, Julien Vermillard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Due to the reasons exposed later, and mainly due to lack of activity :
>
>[ ] +1 Retire the Zeta components project and move to another infra
> like github
>[ ] -1 Do not retire the project, because ...
±0
I do not wa
+1 GitHub rocks your socks !
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Benjamin Eberlei wrote:
> +1 for github
>
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Ole Marius Smestad
>> wrote:
>> > On Friday 13. April 2012 at 10:30, Julien Vermillard wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Due
+1 for github
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Ole Marius Smestad
> wrote:
> > On Friday 13. April 2012 at 10:30, Julien Vermillard wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Due to the reasons exposed later, and mainly due to lack of activity :
> >>
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Ole Marius Smestad wrote:
> On Friday 13. April 2012 at 10:30, Julien Vermillard wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Due to the reasons exposed later, and mainly due to lack of activity :
>>
>> [X] +1 Retire the Zeta components project and move to another infra
>> like github
>
>
On Friday 13. April 2012 at 10:30, Julien Vermillard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Due to the reasons exposed later, and mainly due to lack of activity :
>
> [X] +1 Retire the Zeta components project and move to another infra
> like github
(I am ambivalent about this vote, but...)
I do think that this proje
We also talked few months ago about extra tools for code reviewing.
Do we still need them or GitHub is ok on that ?
What do you think ?
Le 15 avril 2012 10:26, Jérôme Vieilledent a écrit :
> No, as far as I know there is no fee but donation is of course encouraged
> ;-)
>
> ---
> Jérôme Vieill
Guys as much as I appreciate the progressive discussions on Github-
can we please VOTE on this thread and use another mailing thread for
discussions? It makes it almost impossible for Julien to count the
votes.
Thanks!
2012/4/15 Jérôme Vieilledent :
> No, as far as I know there is no fee but don
No, as far as I know there is no fee but donation is of course encouraged ;-)
---
Jérôme Vieilledent
Software engineer
eZ Systems | 26 rue de la République, 69002 Lyon, France
mailto:j...@ez.no
skype lolautruche | twitter @jvieilledent
Le dimanche 15 avril 2012 à 10:21, Maxime Thomas a écrit :
Travis seems good, no host on our side.
Is there a fee or something ?
Le 14 avril 2012 18:11, Jérôme Vieilledent a écrit :
> About CI, we could use Travis. It works perfectly with Github and PHPUnit.
> Several PHP projects already use it
>
> ---
> Jérôme Vieilledent
> Software engineer
>
> eZ Sy
About CI, we could use Travis. It works perfectly with Github and PHPUnit.
Several PHP projects already use it
---
Jérôme Vieilledent
Software engineer
eZ Systems | 26 rue de la République, 69002 Lyon, France
mailto:j...@ez.no
skype lolautruche | twitter @jvieilledent
Le samedi 14 avril 2012
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012, Gaetano Giunta wrote:
> Derick Rethans wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Apr 2012, Julien Vermillard wrote:
> >
> > > Due to the reasons exposed later, and mainly due to lack of activity :
> > >
> > > [X] +1 Retire the Zeta components project and move to another infra
> > >
Derick Rethans wrote:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012, Julien Vermillard wrote:
Due to the reasons exposed later, and mainly due to lack of activity :
[X] +1 Retire the Zeta components project and move to another infra
like github
I think it'd work better on github, but still, there needs
Seems pretty obvious +1
David Neilsen | 07 834 3366 | PANmedia ®
2012/4/14 Philippe VINCENT-ROYOL
> +1 github
>
> --
> Philippe VINCENT-ROYOL
>
>
> Le vendredi 13 avril 2012 à 18:55, Ronan Guilloux a écrit :
>
> > +1
> > & github FTW
> >
> > --
> > Ronan Guilloux
> >
> >
>
>
>
+1 github
--
Philippe VINCENT-ROYOL
Le vendredi 13 avril 2012 à 18:55, Ronan Guilloux a écrit :
> +1
> & github FTW
>
> --
> Ronan Guilloux
>
>
+1
& github FTW
--
Ronan Guilloux
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012, Julien Vermillard wrote:
> Due to the reasons exposed later, and mainly due to lack of activity :
>
>[X] +1 Retire the Zeta components project and move to another infra
> like github
I think it'd work better on github, but still, there needs to be a
release a
James,
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:56 AM, James Pic wrote:
> Shouldn't we consider rolling back the unit tests updates ? That would
> unlock the release process.
we have suggested to retire this podling because of the lack of
activity. If the committers tell us they want to continue with it and
t
+1
2012/4/13 James Pic
> Shouldn't we consider rolling back the unit tests updates ? That would
> unlock the release process.
>
> Regards
>
--
Maxime
maxime.tho...@wascou.org | www.wascou.org | http://twitter.com/wascou
Shouldn't we consider rolling back the unit tests updates ? That would
unlock the release process.
Regards
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Luc Chase wrote:
> What are the general advantages of keeping this project on Apache?
This question has raised many flamewars - you'll find many blogs out
there on "comparing" Github to ASF. Search for "ASF considered
harmful" and the replies from Jim Jagielski.
+1
On Github we could add the docs here via github pages (static) and wiki. Same
for issue tracker.
---
Jérôme Vieilledent
Software engineer
eZ Systems | 26 rue de la République, 69002 Lyon, France
mailto:j...@ez.no
skype lolautruche | twitter @jvieilledent
Le vendredi 13 avril 2012 à 10:40
What are the general advantages of keeping this project on Apache?
On Apr 13, 2012 9:35 AM, "Christian Grobmeier" wrote:
> > [X] +1 Retire the Zeta components project and move to another infra
> like github
>
> :-(
>
> Please note, if somebody is interested to fork this project later, SVN
> wil
Philipp
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Philipp Kamps wrote:
> Let's define retire. Moving the code to github. But what about
> documentation, website, mailing lists etc
See the complete guide:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
Basically SVN is readonly then, project is not a
Let's define retire. Moving the code to github. But what about
documentation, website, mailing lists etc
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Julien Vermillard
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Due to the reasons exposed later, and mainly due to lack of activity :
>
> [ ] +1 Retire the Zeta components project and
> [X] +1 Retire the Zeta components project and move to another infra like
> github
:-(
Please note, if somebody is interested to fork this project later, SVN
will stay (readonly). More information on the retirement process can
be found here:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html
Am 13. April 2012 10:30 schrieb Julien Vermillard :
> Hi,
>
> Due to the reasons exposed later, and mainly due to lack of activity :
>
> [ ] +1 Retire the Zeta components project and move to another infra
> like github
> [ ] -1 Do not retire the project, because ...
>
> This vote is open for t
Hi,
Due to the reasons exposed later, and mainly due to lack of activity :
[ ] +1 Retire the Zeta components project and move to another infra
like github
[ ] -1 Do not retire the project, because ...
This vote is open for the next 72 hours.
Julien
+1 for GitHub
Am 10.04.2012 16:19, schrieb David Neilsen:
> Sad but true.
>
> David Neilsen | 07 834 3366 | PANmedia ®
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Julien Vermillard
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Philippe Vincent-Royol
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Christian,
>>>
>>>
>>> 2012/4
Sad but true.
David Neilsen | 07 834 3366 | PANmedia ®
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Julien Vermillard
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Philippe Vincent-Royol
> wrote:
> > Hi Christian,
> >
> >
> > 2012/4/8 Christian Grobmeier
> >
> >> Hello folks,
> >>
> >> i have not seen any s
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Philippe Vincent-Royol
wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
>
> 2012/4/8 Christian Grobmeier
>
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> i have not seen any substantial changes to ZC for weeks. There were no
>> additions to the community (in fact, substractions, given the recent
>> email from je
Hi Christian,
2012/4/8 Christian Grobmeier
> Hello folks,
>
> i have not seen any substantial changes to ZC for weeks. There were no
> additions to the community (in fact, substractions, given the recent
> email from jerome), no commits, no email activity. This project seems
> pretty dead for m
Hello folks,
i have not seen any substantial changes to ZC for weeks. There were no
additions to the community (in fact, substractions, given the recent
email from jerome), no commits, no email activity. This project seems
pretty dead for me.
The ASF is about community; ZC has none and it is very
44 matches
Mail list logo
