On 04/20/10 05:32 PM, Sunil wrote:
ouch! My apologies! I did not understand what you were trying to say.
I was gearing towards:
1. Using the newer 1TB in the eventual RAIDZ. Newer hardware typically means
(slightly) faster access times and sequential throughput.
Using a slice on a newer
On 20.04.10 07:52, Ken Gunderson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 12:27 +0700, C. Bergström wrote:
Ken Gunderson wrote:
Greetings All:
Granted there has been much fear, uncertainty, and doubt following
Oracle's take over of Sun, but I ran across this on a FreeBSD mailing
list post dated
This is how rumors get started.
From reading that thread, the OP didn't seem to know much of anything
about...
anything. Even less so about Solaris and OpenSolaris. I'd advise not to
get your
news from mailing lists, especially not mailing lists for people who don't
use the
product you're
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Improbability assessment aside, suppose you use something like the DDRDrive
X1 ... Which might be more like 4G instead of 32G ... Is it even physically
possible to write 4G to any device in less than 10 seconds? Remember, to
achieve worst case,
I have certainly moved a root pool from one disk to another, with the
same basic process, ie:
- fuss with fdisk and SMI labels (sigh)
- zpool create
- snapshot, send and recv
- installgrub
- swap disks
I looked over the root pool recovery section in the Best Practices guide
at the time,
Thank you very much for your help! I wasn't aware of those options.
...sending end is running rsync 3.0 (Ubuntu 8.04 LTS), crossing my fingers,
hoping it'll work.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
Why don't you just fix the apparently broken link to your source, then?
Regards,
Tonmaus
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
ok thanks for the fast info. that sounds really awesome. i am glad i tried out
zfs, so i no longer have to worry about this issues and the fact that i can
upgrad forth and back between stripe and mirror is amazing. money was short, so
only 2 disks had been put in and since the data is not that
I have no idea who you're talking to, but presumably you mean this link:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2010-April/215269.html
Worked fine for me. I didn't post it. I'm not the OP on this thread or on
the FreeBSD thread. So what broken link are you talking about and to
Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com writes:
I'm seeing a really big (to big to be excused lightly) difference with
the 2 zfs native methods zpool and rpool
Typo alert: The above line should have read:
the 2 zfs native methods ZPOOL list and ZFS list
compared to 2 native unix
you talking about and to whom brwere you
responding?brbrdiv class=gmail_quote
My intention was a response to the OP, which I guess from what I am seeing in
the jive forum, happened as well. Indeed, my concern was the broken link in the
first post which would be simple to fix if intended. That
div id=jive-html-wrapper-div
div class=gmail_quoteOn Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 1:42
AM, Ian Garbutt span dir=ltrlt;a
href=mailto:ian.g.garb...@newcastle.gov.uk;ian.g.gar
b...@newcastle.gov.uk/agt;/span
wrote:brblockquote class=gmail_quote
style=margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc
Don't copy the netiquette issue you are seeing, as I am talking about nothing
but an issue in a post on this forum. Why should I contact the OP off record
about this?
There is no need to read intentions either. I just made clear once more what is
obvious from board metadata anyhow.
Besides
Oracle has no plan to move from ZFS as the principle storage platform for
Solaris 10 and OpenSolaris. It remains key to both data management and to
the OS infrastructure such as root/boot, install and upgrade.
Thanks
Dominic Kay
Product Manager, Filesystems
Oracle
2010/4/20 Khyron
Khyron,
Finally, Michael S. made the best recommendation...talk to your sales
rep if you're
a paying customer.
... but don't expect any commitments or generic answer from them at the
moment.
I do however congratulate quoting Mr. Harman in your .sig ;-)
Regards... Sean.
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 13:57 +0100, Dominic Kay wrote:
Oracle has no plan to move from ZFS as the principle storage platform
for Solaris 10 and OpenSolaris. It remains key to both data management
and to the OS infrastructure such as root/boot, install and upgrade.
Thanks
Dominic Kay
Good news for Nexenta and OpenSolaris community in general:
http://www.nexenta.com/corp/blog/2010/04/06/bill-moore-joins-nexenta-advisory-board/
Nexenta invites talents and hiring OpenSolaris Kernel/API engineers. If
you are in SF bay area and you think you are qualified, send your resume
by
Yes, I apologize. I didn't notice you were running the OpenSolaris
release. What I outlined below would work on a Solaris 10 system.
I wonder if beadm supports a similar migration. I will find out
and let you know.
Thanks,
Cindy
On 04/19/10 17:22, Brandon High wrote:
On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at
Contrepois
Coblan srl
__ Informazioni da ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versione del database delle
firme digitali 5044 (20100420) __
Il messaggio ? stato controllato da ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
www.nod32.it
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
I did the same experiment in an VMWare guest (SLES10 x64). The archive was
stored on the vdisk and untarring went to the same vdisk.
The storage backend is sun system with 64 GB RAM, 2*QC cpus, 24 SAS disks with
450 GB, 4 vdevs with 6 disks as RAIDZ2, an Intel X25-E as log device (c2t1d0).
A
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 09:03:33AM -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
zfs list -t snapshot lists in time order.
Good to know. I'll keep that in mind for my zfs send scripts but it's not
relevant for the case at hand. Because zfs list isn't available on the
NFS client, where the users are
Hi All.
I have pool (3 disks, raidz1). I made recabling for disks and now some of
disks in pool not available (cannot open). bounce back is not possible. Can
i recovery data from this pool?
Thanks.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
From: Richard Elling [mailto:richard.ell...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 10:17 PM
Hi Geoff,
The Canucks have already won their last game of the season :-)
more below...
Hi Richard,
I didn't watch the game last night, but obviously Vancouver better pick up
their socks or they will be
Not to be a conspiracy nut but anyone anywhere could have registered
that gmail account and supplied that answer. It would be a lot more
believable from Mr Kay's Oracle or Sun account.
On 4/20/2010 9:40 AM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 13:57 +0100, Dominic Kay wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 04:28:02PM +, A Darren Dunham wrote:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 09:03:33AM -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
zfs list -t snapshot lists in time order.
Good to know. I'll keep that in mind for my zfs send scripts but it's not
relevant for the case at hand.
On Tue, Apr 20 at 11:41, Don Turnbull wrote:
Not to be a conspiracy nut but anyone anywhere could have registered
that gmail account and supplied that answer. It would be a lot more
believable from Mr Kay's Oracle or Sun account.
+1
Glad I wasn't the only one who noticed.
--
Eric D. Mudama
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Don Turnbull wrote:
Not to be a conspiracy nut but anyone anywhere could have registered that
gmail account and supplied that answer. It would be a lot more believable
from Mr Kay's Oracle or Sun account.
It is true that gmail accounts are just as free and untrustworthy
This thread starts with someone who doesn't claim to have any
authoritative information or attempt to cite any sources using a gmail
account to post to a mailgroup. Now people turn around and say that
they doubt the sourcing on this, but looking at the archives of this
list, there are a
Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 04:28:02PM +, A Darren Dunham wrote:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 09:03:33AM -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
zfs list -t snapshot lists in time order.
Good to know. I'll keep that in mind for my zfs send scripts but it's not
relevant for the
Brandon,
You can use the OpenSolaris beadm command to migrate a ZFS BE over
to another root pool, but you will also need to perform some manual
migration steps, such as
- copy over your other rpool datasets
- recreate swap and dump devices
- install bootblocks
- update BIOS and GRUB entries to
On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 18:51 +0100, Bayard Bell wrote:
This thread starts with someone who doesn't claim to have any
authoritative information or attempt to cite any sources using a gmail
account to post to a mailgroup. Now people turn around and say that
Whoa! By way of clarification:
1)
Geoff Nordli geo...@grokworx.com wrote:
With our particular use case we are going to do a save
state on their
virtual machines, which is going to write 100-400 MB
per VM via CIFS or
NFS, then we take a snapshot of the volume, which
guarantees we get a
consistent copy of their VM.
maybe
Ken,
The sharpest parts of my remarks weren't directed your way, and I
regret if that wasn't as clear as I had thought. For clarification: I
was referring to the thread as starting with what you forwarded by URL
(which was sent from a gmail address to the freebsd list), and my
objection
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 12:55:10PM -0600, Cindy Swearingen wrote:
You can use the OpenSolaris beadm command to migrate a ZFS BE over
to another root pool, but you will also need to perform some manual
migration steps, such as
- copy over your other rpool datasets
- recreate swap and dump
I have a storage server with snv_134 installed. This has four zfs file systems
shared with iscsi that are mounted as zfs volumes on a Sun v480.
Everything has been working great for about a month, and all of a sudden the
v480 has timeout errors when trying to connect to the iscsi volumes on the
Hi,
I've accidentally put a double slash in a mountpoint, and now can't change it.
# zfs list
...
dataPool/SoftwareRepo 529G 31.3T 73.1K /sw-repo1/
dataPool/SoftwareRepo/dir1 6.10G 31.3T 6.10G /sw-repo1//dir1
dataPool/SoftwareRepo/dir2 26.0G 31.3T 25.7G /sw-repo1//dir2
...
#
I'm doing a little research study on ZFS benchmarking and performance
profiling. Like most, I've had my favorite methods, but I'm
re-evaluating my choices and trying to be a bit more scientific than I
have in the past.
To that end, I'm curious if folks wouldn't mind sharing their work on
the
From: Bob Friesenhahn [mailto:bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us]
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Just be aware that if *any* of your devices fail, all is lost.
(Because
you've said it's configured as a nonredundant stripe.)
The good news is that it is easy to convert any
From: cas...@holland.sun.com [mailto:cas...@holland.sun.com] On Behalf
Of casper@sun.com
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Improbability assessment aside, suppose you use something like the
DDRDrive
X1 ... Which might be more like 4G instead of 32G ... Is it even
Ryan John wrote:
Hi,
I've accidentally put a double slash in a mountpoint, and now can't change it.
# zfs list
...
dataPool/SoftwareRepo 529G 31.3T 73.1K /sw-repo1/
dataPool/SoftwareRepo/dir1 6.10G 31.3T 6.10G /sw-repo1//dir1
dataPool/SoftwareRepo/dir2 26.0G 31.3T 25.7G
Hi Timothy,
That didn't work either.
# zfs inherit mountpoint dataPool/SoftwareRepo
cannot unmount '/sw-repo1/dir2': Device busy
Regards
John
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Haley [mailto:tim.ha...@oracle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 21 April 2010 5:52 AM
To: Ryan John
Cc:
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Ryan John john.r...@bsse.ethz.ch wrote:
Anyone know how to fix it?
I can't even do a zfs destroy
zfs unmount -a -f
-B
--
Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
solar...@nedharvey.com wrote:
there's a file or something you want to rollback, it's presently difficult
to know how far back up the tree you need to go, to find the correct .zfs
subdirectory, and then you need to figure out the name of the
43 matches
Mail list logo
