[zfs-discuss] very slow boot: stuck at mounting zfs filesystems

2010-12-08 Thread Frank Van Damme
Hello list, I'm having trouble with a server holding a lot of data. After a few months of uptime, it is currently rebooting from a lockup (reason unknown so far) but it is taking hours to boot up again. The boot process is stuck at the stage where it says: mounting zfs filesystems (1/5) the

Re: [zfs-discuss] very slow boot: stuck at mounting zfs filesystems

2010-12-08 Thread Wolfram Tomalla
Hi Frank, you might face the problem of lots of snapshots of your filesystems. For each snapshot a device is created during import of the pool. This can easily lead to an extend startup time. At my system it took about 15 minutes for 3500 snapshots. 2010/12/8 Frank Van Damme

Re: [zfs-discuss] very slow boot: stuck at mounting zfs filesystems

2010-12-08 Thread Fred Liu
Failed zil devices will also cause this... Fred From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Wolfram Tomalla Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 10:40 PM To: Frank Van Damme Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] very

Re: [zfs-discuss] [OpenIndiana-discuss] iops...

2010-12-08 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
I am totally aware of these differences, but it seems some people think RAIDz is nonsense unless you don't need speed at all. My testing shows (so far) that the speed is quite good, far better than single drives. Also, as Eric said, those speeds are for random i/o. I doubt there is very

Re: [zfs-discuss] 3TB HDD in ZFS

2010-12-08 Thread Brandon High
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote: What about Hitachi HDS723030ALA640 (aka Deskstar 7K3000, claimed 24/7)? The spec sheets claim 512b sectors, so hopefully it'll work. There's a lot more info to support that at

[zfs-discuss] Best choice - file system for system

2010-12-08 Thread Albert
Hi, I wonder what is the better option to install the system on solaris ufs and zfs sensitive data on whether this is the best all on zfs? What are the pros and cons of such a solution? f...@ll ___ zfs-discuss mailing list

Re: [zfs-discuss] very slow boot: stuck at mounting zfs filesystems

2010-12-08 Thread taemun
Dedup? Taking a long time to boot after hard reboot after lookup? I'll bet that it hard locked whilst deleting some files or a dataset that was dedup'd. After the delete is started, it spends *ages* cleaning up the DDT (the table containing a list of dedup'd blocks). If you hard lock in the

Re: [zfs-discuss] [OpenIndiana-discuss] iops...

2010-12-08 Thread Ross Walker
On Dec 7, 2010, at 9:49 PM, Edward Ned Harvey opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote: From: Ross Walker [mailto:rswwal...@gmail.com] Well besides databases there are VM datastores, busy email servers, busy ldap servers, busy web servers, and I'm sure the list goes on and

Re: [zfs-discuss] Best choice - file system for system

2010-12-08 Thread Bob Friesenhahn
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Albert wrote: I wonder what is the better option to install the system on solaris ufs and zfs sensitive data on whether this is the best all on zfs? What are the pros and cons of such a solution? The best choice is usually to install with zfs root on a mirrored pair of

Re: [zfs-discuss] Best choice - file system for system

2010-12-08 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Bob Friesenhahn The best choice is usually to install with zfs root on a mirrored pair of disks. UFS is going away as a boot option. UFS is already unavailable as a boot option. It's only

Re: [zfs-discuss] Faster than 1G Ether... ESX to ZFS

2010-12-08 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
For anyone who cares: I created an ESXi machine. Installed two guest (centos) machines and vmware-tools. Connected them to each other via only a virtual switch. Used rsh to transfer large quantities of data between the two guests, unencrypted, uncompressed. Have found that ESXi virtual switch

Re: [zfs-discuss] [OpenIndiana-discuss] iops...

2010-12-08 Thread Edward Ned Harvey
From: Edward Ned Harvey [mailto:opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com] In order to test random reads, you have to configure iozone to use a data set which is much larger than physical ram. Since iozone will write a big file and then immediately afterward, start reading it

Re: [zfs-discuss] Best choice - file system for system

2010-12-08 Thread Jerry Kemp
The only situation I can think of where UFS would be advantageous over ZFS might be in a low memory situation. ZFS loves memory. But to answer the original question, ZFS is where you want to be. Jerry On 12/08/10 20:56, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org

Re: [zfs-discuss] Faster than 1G Ether... ESX to ZFS

2010-12-08 Thread Ross Walker
On Dec 8, 2010, at 11:41 PM, Edward Ned Harvey opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensola...@nedharvey.com wrote: For anyone who cares: I created an ESXi machine. Installed two guest (centos) machines and vmware-tools. Connected them to each other via only a virtual switch. Used rsh to transfer

Re: [zfs-discuss] snaps lost in space?

2010-12-08 Thread Matthew Ahrens
usedsnap is the amount of space consumed by all snapshots. Ie, the amount of space that would be recovered if all snapshots were to be deleted. The space used by any one snapshot is the space that would be recovered if that snapshot was deleted. Ie, the amount of space that is unique to that