appear either as holes or as L0 unallocated.
I wonder how those unallocated BPs came to be and if their presence is valid and
is to be expected by the ZFS code.
Just in case, the indirect block passes checksum verification (and also
decompression, in fact).
Thank you very much in advance.
--
Andriy
Does zdb leak checking mechanism also check for the opposite situation?
That is, used/referenced blocks being in free regions of space maps.
Thank you.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org
-
remotepool/users logbias latency default
remotepool/users dedup off default
remotepool/users mlslabel -
remotepool/users sync standard default
--
Andriy
' was added to the condition in question?
I really would like to understand interaction between VM behavior and ARC sizing
in OpenSolaris.
Thank you very much for any help!
--
Andriy Gapon
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
]
--
Andriy Gapon
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
25, 2010, at 11:42 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I am working on improving some ZFS-related bits in FreeBSD boot chain.
At the moment it seems that the things work mostly fine except for a case
where
the boot code needs to read gang blocks. We have some reports from users
about
failures
, there are some pre-made test pool images available?
Or some specialized tool?
Thanks a lot!
--
Andriy Gapon
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
that on this useful mostly technical mailing list such random
garbage from a random source gets posted at all. And then gets taken seriously
even...
--
Andriy Gapon
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org
, it
should include a ZFS micro-exam too.
Jokes aside, this is too easy to make a mistake with the consequences that are
too hard to correct. Anyone disagrees?
--
Andriy Gapon
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
that there could be other interesting uses for this.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
on 29/07/2009 17:24 Andre van Eyssen said the following:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Subdirectory is automatically a new filesystem property - an
administrator turns
on this magic property of a filesystem, after that every mkdir *in the
root* of
that filesystem creates a new
on 29/07/2009 17:52 Andre van Eyssen said the following:
On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Well, I specifically stated that this property should not be
recursive, i.e. it
should work only in a root of a filesystem.
When setting this property on a filesystem an administrator should
12 matches
Mail list logo
