On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 9:49 AM, iman habibi iman.hab...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear support
when i connect my external usb dvdrom to the sparc machine which has
installed solaris 10u6 based zfs file system,,it return this error:
bash-3.00# mount /dev/dsk/c1t0d0s0 /dvd/
Jan 27 11:08:41 global
There is an update in build 105, but it is only pertaining to the Raid
Management tool:
Issues Resolved:
BUG/RFE:6776690http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6776690Areca
raid management util doesn't work on solaris
Files Changed:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:58 AM, mijenix mije...@gmx.ch wrote:
yes, that's the way zpool likes it
I think I've to understand how (Open)Solaris create disks or how
the partition thing works under OSol. Do you know any guide or howto?
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Johan Hartzenberg jhart...@gmail.comwrote:
I have this situation working and use my shared pool between Linux and
Solaris. Note: The shared pool needs to reside on a whole physical disk or
on a primary fdisk partition, Unless something changed since I last
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 8:28 PM, David Abrahams d...@boostpro.com wrote:
FWIW, I managed to build a source merge of the solaris grub-0.97 (with
ZFS capability) and ubuntu's latest copy of grub-0.97 (with whatever
patches they've backported into it). The sources are available at
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 4:10 AM, noz sf2...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's my solution:
(1) n...@holodeck:~# zpool create epool mirror c4t1d0 c4t2d0 c4t3d0
n...@holodeck:~# zfs list
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
epool 69K 15.6G18K /epool
rpool
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 9:55 AM, hardware technician figh...@yahoo.comwrote:
I want to create a separate home, shared, read/write zfs partition on a
tri-boot OpenSolaris, Ubuntu, and CentOS system. I have successfully
created and exported the zpools that I would like to use, in Ubuntu using
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 6:25 PM, noz sf2...@gmail.com wrote:
The above is very dangerous, if it
will even work. The output of the zfs send is
redirected to /tmp, which is a ramdisk. If you
have enough space (RAM + Swap), it will work, but if
there is a reboot or crash before the zfs
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Weldon S Godfrey 3 wel...@excelsus.comwrote:
If memory serves me right, sometime around 12:34am, Michael McKnight told
me:
I have tried import -f, import -d, import -f -d ... nothing works.
Did you try zpool export 1st?
He did say he was doing
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 7:33 AM, scott new.mail.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
do you mean a pool on a SEPARATE partition?
--
That is what I do. In particular, I have:
fdisk partition 1 = Solaris partition type 0xbf = rpool = 40 GB
fdisk partition 2 = MSDOS partition type = SHARED zpool = 190 GB
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Orvar Korvar
knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com wrote:
Ok, so I could partition a drive into two parts, and treat each of the
partitions as one drive? And then I exchange one partition at a time with a
whole new drive? That sounds neat. I must format the drive
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Orvar Korvar
knatte_fnatte_tja...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have a ZFS raid and wonder if it is possible to move the ZFS raid around
from SATA port to another? Ive heard that someone assembled the SATA
connections differently and the ZFS raid wouldnt work.
Say that
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 8:00 PM, dick hoogendijk d...@nagual.nl wrote:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 07:36:07 PST
Uwe Dippel udip...@gmail.com wrote:
[i]If you want to add the entire Solaris partition to the zfs pool as
a mirror, use zpool attach -f rpool c1d0s0 c2d0s2[/i]
So my mistake in the
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 12:13 PM, dick hoogendijk d...@nagual.nl wrote:
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:02:31 PST
Uwe Dippel udip...@gmail.com wrote:
Now I modified the slice s0, so that is doesn't overlap with s2 (the
whole disk) any longer:
Part TagFlag Cylinders Size
Hello ZFS gurus and fellow fans.
As we all know ZFS does not _yet_ support relayout of pools. I want to know
whether there is any hope for this to become available in the near future?
From my outside view it sounds like it should be possible to set a flag to
stop allocating new blocks from a
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Thanos McAtos mca...@ics.forth.gr wrote:
My problems are 2:
1) I don't know how to properly age a file-system. As already said, I need
traces of a decade's workload to properly do this, and to the best of my
knowledge there is no easy way to do this
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:43 PM, casper@sun.com wrote:
When current uber-block A is detected to point to a corrupted on-disk
data,
how would zpool import (or any other tool for that matter) quickly and
safely know that, once it found an older uber-block B that it points to
a
set of
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Ross myxi...@googlemail.com wrote:
I know Eric mentioned the possibility of zpool import doing more of this
kind of thing, and he said that it's current inability to do this will be
fixed, but I don't know if it's an official project, RFE or bug. Can
anybody
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Miles Nordin car...@ivy.net wrote:
0. The reports I read were not useless in the way some have stated,
because for example Mike sampled his own observations:
[snip]
I don't see when the single-LUN SAN corruption problems were fixed. I
think the
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 6:37 PM, Aaron Blew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've done some basic testing with a X4150 machine using 6 disks in a RAID 5
and RAID Z configuration. They perform very similarly, but RAIDZ definitely
has more system overhead. In many cases this won't be a big deal, but if
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Jeff Bonwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These are the conditions:
(1) The bug is specific to the root pool. Other pools are unaffected.
(2) It is triggered by doing a 'zpool online' while I/O is in flight.
(3) Item (2) can be triggered by syseventd.
(4) The
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Vincent Boisard [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
OTOH - if you don't know OpenSolaris well enough, you're better off
either picking an earlier release that has proven to have very few
relevant warts - usually based on a recommendation for other, more
experieced,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Vincent Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Just wondering if anyone knows of a patch released for 10u6?
I realize this is OT but want to test my new ability with ZFS root to do
lucreate, patch the alternate BE, and luactivate it.
Send me an explorer and I will run
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Michael Schuster
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Mark J Musante wrote:
Hi Michael,
Did you try doing an export/import of tank?
no - that would make it unavailable for use right? I don't think I can
(easily) do that during production hours.
Can you please post
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 4:42 PM, Brian Hechinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If what the OP is looking for is redundant but not nessesarily exact copies
(he
only wants the last X days on the backup disk, for example) he may want to
consider
looking into SAM.
The OP described a solution where
DNLC seems to be independent.
From my laptop, which has only got ZFS file systems (Two ZPOOLs), the stats
are:
$ kstat -n dnlcstats
module: unixinstance: 0
name: dnlcstats class:misc
crtime 25.772681029
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Sergio Arroutbi [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
My point is that I want to use the same directory in the recorder program.
I get the streaming, and start writing the file in /mnt/streamingDirectory
So I would like to record in the same way, just configuring (via zfs
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Marcus Sundman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Elling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marcus Sundman wrote:
How can I verify the checksums for a specific file?
ZFS doesn't checksum files.
AFAIK ZFS checksums all data, including the contents of files.
So a
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 4:00 AM, Marcus Sundman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I verify the checksums for a specific file?
I have a feeling you are not asking the question about ZFS hosted files
specifically.
If you downloaded a file, enter
cksum filename
To get the CRC Check-Sum
For more
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 6:59 AM, Johan Hartzenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 4:00 AM, Marcus Sundman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I verify the checksums for a specific file?
I have a feeling you are not asking the question about ZFS hosted files
specifically
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Laurent Burnotte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
= is there in zfs an automatic mechanism during solaris 10 boot that
prevent the import of pool B ( mounted /A/B ) before trying to import A
pool or do we have to legacy mount and file /etc/vfstab
This is fine if the
Reboot to the grub menu
Move to the failsafe kernel entry
tap e to edit entry.
go to the kernel entry and tap e again
Append -kv to the end of the line
Accept and tap b to boot the line.
After some output you will be prompted to mount the root pool on /a - Enter
y to accept.
You will then get a
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 2:35 AM, Dave Bevans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a customer with the following question...
She's trying to combine 2 ZFS 460gb disks into one 900gb ZFS disk. If this
is possible how is this done? Is there any documentation on this that I can
provide to
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:25 PM, dick hoogendijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have to dig deeper with kmdb. But before we do that, tell me please
what is an easy way to transfer the messages from the failsafe login on
the problematic machine to i.e. this S10u5 server. All former screen
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Joseph Mocker
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If I add the second array to the pool, I could probably continue with the
same number of columns in the raidz, but the size of the strips would
increase. Would this effect performance somehow?
I hate
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Joseph Mocker
[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello,
I haven't seen this discussed before. Any pointers would be appreciated.
I'm curious, if I have a set of disks in a system, is there any benefit
or disadvantage to breaking the disks into
Some people wrote:
covered code. Since Sun owns that code they would need to rattle the
cage. Sun? Anyone have any talks with these guys yet?
Isn't CDDL file based so they could implement all the new functionality in
Wouldn't it be great if programmers could just focus on writing code
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Richard Elling [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Mikael Kjerrman wrote:
define a lot :-)
We are doing about 7-8M per second which I don't think is a lot but
perhaps it is enough to screw up the estimates? Anyhow the resilvering
completed about 4386h earlier than
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 1:30 PM, jonathan sai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you mind helping me ask your tech guy whether there will be
repercussions when I try to run this command in view of the situation below:
# *zpool add -f zhome raidz c6t6006016056AC1A00C8FB7A6346F8DB11d0
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note the progress so far 0.04%. In my experience the time estimate has
no basis in reality until it's about 1% do or so. I think there is some
bookkeeping or something ZFS does at the start of a scrub or resilver that
throws off the
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Detlef [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With Nevada Build 98 I realize a slow zpool import of my pool which
holds my user and archive data on my laptop.
The first time it was realized during the boot if Solaris tells me to
mount zfs filesystems
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 2:06 PM, James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Johan Hartzenberg writes:
I am guessing the answer is YMMV depending on the differences in versions
of, for example Firefox, Gnome, Thunderbird, etc, and based on how well
these cope with settings that was changed
Well, I want to give OpenSolaris a try, but have not yet worked up the
confidence to just try it. So a few questions:
When I start the OpenSolaris installer, will it install into my existing
root zpool?
Which is called RPOOL. not rpool?
Without destroying my existing Nevada installations?
Or
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Ian Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Miles Nordin writes:
suggested that unlike the SVM feature it should be automatic, because
by so being it becomes useful as an availability tool rather than just
performance optimisation.
So on a server with a read
You may also need to just boot to safe mode and manually import the root
pool to mount on /a, then reboot as this updates the device path stored in
the pool's on-disk meta-data. If you search for my posts you will find
plenty discussions about my adventures with this.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Yi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I see docs talking about how to add a fdisk partition (or primary
partition) to a zfs pool. But I wonder if it's possible to add a logical
partition, which is inside the extended partition, to a pool. I'm on an X86
system and
I believe it would be handy to be able to examine properties of a ZFS pool
and all the data sets in it prior to importing the pool. In particular I
would like to be able to do commands similar to zfs list and zfs get ,
for example to see where file systems will be mounted, whether they will be
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 6:44 PM, Bob Netherton [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 09:16 -0700, Daniel Templeton wrote:
Is there a way that I can add the disk to a ZFS pool and have
the ZFS pool accessible to all of the OS instances? I poked through the
docs and searched around a
Hello,
Since I've got my disk partitioning sorted out now, I want to move my BE
from the old disk to the new disk.
I created a new zpool, named RPOOL for distinction with the existing
rpool.
I then did lucreate -p RPOOL -n new95
This completed without error, the log is at the bottom of this
I am trying to upgrade my laptop hard drive, and want to use Live-upgrade.
What I have done so far is:
1. Moved the old drive to an external enclosure
2. Made it bootable (At this point I had to overcome the first obstacle -
due to ZFS storing the disk device path in the ZFS structure it refused
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Rahul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can u site the differences b/w ZFS and FAT filesystems??
Assuming you are serious, the technical bits can be found here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems
But there is a bigger, fundamental difference
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Matt Harrison
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Miles Nordin wrote:
mh == Matt Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
mh I'm worried about is if the entire batch is failing slowly
mh and will all die at the same time.
Matt, can you please post the output
I tried to be clever and botched my upgrade. Now I don't get a grub menu,
only an error like this:
=
Booting 'BE3 Solaris xVM'
findroot (BE_BE3,1,a)
Error 15: File not found
Press any key to continue
=
I do not see a grub menu prior to this error,
Hello kugutsumen, Did you have any luck in resolving your problems?
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Kugutsumen [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I've just installed 2008.05 on a 500 gig disk... Install went fine...
I attached an identically partitioned and labeled disk as soon as the
rpool was
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 11:43 PM, Johan Hartzenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
[snip]
I could now just re-install and recover my data (I keep my data far away
from OS disks/pools), or I can try to fix grub. I hope to learn from this
process so my questions are:
1. What is up with grub here? I
Hi Dick
You want Mirroring. A Sun system with mirrored disks can be configured to
not go down due to one disk failing. For this to be valid, you need to also
make sure that the device used for SWAP is mirrored - you won't believe how
many times I've seen this mistake being made.
To be even
Sorry, but I'm stuck at 6540.
There are so many options in how you would practically configure these that
there is no way to give a sensible answer to your question. But the most
basic questions are: Does the racks have power from separate PDUs? Are they
in physically remote locations? Does
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Jeff Bonwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would just swap the physical locations of the drives, so that the
second half of the mirror is in the right location to be bootable.
ZFS won't mind -- it tracks the disks by content, not by pathname.
Note that SATA is
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For your second one I'm less sure what's going on:
# zpool create temparray raidz c1t2d0 c1t4d0 raidz c1t3d0 c1t5d0 raidz
c1t6d0 c1t8d0
This creates three two disk raid-z sets and stripes the data across them.
The problem is
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 9:34 PM, Robert Lawhead
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
About a month ago (Jun 2008), I received information indicating that a
putback fixing this problem was in the works and might appear as soon as
b92. Apparently this estimate was overly optimistic; Does anyone know
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Christiaan Willemsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The question is: how can we maximize IO by using the best possible
combination of hardware and ZFS RAID?
Here are some generic concepts that still hold true:
More disks can handle more IOs.
Larger disks can put
On Feb 10, 2008 9:06 AM, Jonathan Loran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Elling wrote:
Nick wrote:
Using the RAID cards capability for RAID6 sounds attractive?
Assuming the card works well with Solaris, this sounds like a
reasonable solution.
Careful here. If your
On Feb 5, 2008 9:52 PM, William Fretts-Saxton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This may not be a ZFS issue, so please bear with me!
I have 4 internal drives that I have striped/mirrored with ZFS and have an
application server which is reading/writing to hundreds of thousands of
files on it,
63 matches
Mail list logo
