there no brain enough to use LaTeX).
What you wrote tells more about you than about FreeBSD and FreeBSD community.
P.S.
I am surprised that on this useful mostly technical mailing list such random
garbage from a random source gets posted at all. And then gets taken seriously
even...
some pre-made test pool images available?
Or some specialized tool?
Thanks a lot!
--
Andriy Gapon
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
> On May 25, 2010, at 11:42 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
>> I am working on improving some ZFS-related bits in FreeBSD boot chain.
>> At the moment it seems that the things work mostly fine except for a case
>> where
>> the boot code needs to read gang blocks. We ha
ing one OS instead of two is the first thing that comes
to mind]
--
Andriy Gapon
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
from taking place?
If not, then why 'extra' was added to the condition in question?
I really would like to understand interaction between VM behavior and ARC sizing
in OpenSolaris.
Thank you very much for any help!
--
Andriy Gapon
___
zfs-
lways be interactive and ask for at least
two confirmations that a user knows what he is doing and why. Perhaps, it
should include a ZFS micro-exam too.
Jokes aside, this is too easy to make a mistake with the consequences that are
too hard to correct. Anyone disagrees?
--
Andriy Gapon
___
Does zdb leak checking mechanism also check for the opposite situation?
That is, used/referenced blocks being in free regions of space maps.
Thank you.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org
appear either as holes or as "L0 unallocated".
I wonder how those unallocated BPs came to be and if their presence is valid and
is to be expected by the ZFS code.
Just in case, the indirect block passes checksum verification (and also
decompression, in fact).
Thank
latency default
> remotepool/users dedup off default
> remotepool/users mlslabel -
> remotepool/users sync standard default
--
Andriy Gapon
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
I am sure that there could be other interesting uses for this.
--
Andriy Gapon
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
on 29/07/2009 17:24 Andre van Eyssen said the following:
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
>> "Subdirectory is automatically a new filesystem" property - an
>> administrator turns
>> on this magic property of a filesystem, after that every mkdir *in
on 29/07/2009 17:52 Andre van Eyssen said the following:
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2009, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
>> Well, I specifically stated that this property should not be
>> recursive, i.e. it
>> should work only in a root of a filesystem.
>> When setting this property on
12 matches
Mail list logo
