John W. Redelfs wrote:
At 12:42 PM, Saturday, 11/2/02, Marc A. Schindler wrote:
The 1P don't say. It doesn't appear to be a concern for them. That could
be why all
the sciences are represented in the curriculum at BYU (in fact, BYU's
evolutionary
biologists are leading cladists, a
I know I'm being I-told-you-so-ish again, (not to John, just in general) but
some years ago, when I wrote a review for Sunstone of LauraMaery Gold's first
Mormons on the Internet version I said that these freebie sites were not going
to survive without a proper business model, and that meant
Just be careful: a lot of what Crowther wrote was personal speculation on his
part.
Valerie Nielsen Williams wrote:
Hey Zion:
Just wanting to know if anyone has read Life Everlasting by
Crowther, and if so, what do you think. It was recommended to me by a
friend who knows that since
Yes, even the army's cleaned itself up ;-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Larry Jackson:
Scientific wild- _ _ _ guess.
There are other meanings, as well, but that's the primary
one in most common use.
Paul Osborne:
Ha ha ha ah. I didn't think you had in you Larry.
___
Well,
Marc A. Schindler wrote:
---
Just be careful: a lot of what Crowther wrote was personal speculation
on his part.
---
Shouldn't be much of a problem, because more than half the text consists
of direct quotations--from personal journals and letters of those who
experienced or spoke of death
That's exactly what I wrote: I *don't* believe the scriptures are
secular
histories.
If this was so, the apostles and prophets from Joseph Smith on would have
told us so. everything I have ever heard from modern prophets teaches
that the old history of the world is true and historical unless you
After much pondering, Marc A. Schindler favored us with:
Part of the reason I turned away from science to religion is because I
despaired of learning anything with any certainty when the foremost
authorities in almost every field disagree with fellow scientists about
really basic things. I
Paul Osborne wrote:
---
Maybe we don't even really exist. Would someone
pinch me please?
---
Sure, happy to--
PINCH!
OUCH!! You didn't have to do it so hard, you meanie.
;-)
Paul O
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sign Up for Juno Platinum
JWR confessed
I'm just a black and white kind of guy.
Me too. And, I don't take prisoners.
;-)
Paul O
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
Only $9.95 per month!
Visit www.juno.com
Also, maybe our whole religious experience is self induced with
naturally
occurring chemicals in our brains that make us wishy washy? Maybe the
whole thing is a joke? Maybe we don't even really exist. Would someone
pinch me please?
I know I exist, but maybe you're a figment of my imagination .
How about just thinking of things as tools? Science isn't in opposition to
religion except in the hands of ignorant atheists, as far as I'm concerned (and
there are plenty of them, to be sure). It's just a tool, a certain disciplined
way of looking at things, that's all. The confusion arises when
11 matches
Mail list logo
