Stephen Beecroft wrote:
> -Marc-
> > I believe that in general prophecies tend to be broader than just
> > one issue, and it's we members who narrow them down (all of us, or
> > most of us).
>
> I tend to agree with this. Interesting, then, that you wrote:
>
> > and Elder Nelson's words were, a
-Marc-
> I believe that in general prophecies tend to be broader than just
> one issue, and it's we members who narrow them down (all of us, or
> most of us).
I tend to agree with this. Interesting, then, that you wrote:
> and Elder Nelson's words were, as far as I'm concerned, very clear
> and
Stephen Beecroft wrote:
> -Marc-
> > Stephen, I'm not going to engage in point-by-point games here.
> > Life's too short,
>
> Not that I necessarily disagree with the above, but if that's how you
> feel, why are you so willing to engage in "point-by-point games" at
> other times?
>
I'm human.
-Marc-
> Stephen, I'm not going to engage in point-by-point games here.
> Life's too short,
Not that I necessarily disagree with the above, but if that's how you
feel, why are you so willing to engage in "point-by-point games" at
other times?
> and Elder Nelson's words were, as far as I'm conc
Stephen, I'm not going to engage in point-by-point games here. Life's too short,
and Elder Nelson's words were, as far as I'm concerned, very clear and
unamibiguous. Dan, in the course of his discussion, which wasn't just about Elder
Nelson's talk, has used two sources. I criticized the first one
-Marc-
> Just read over Elder Nelson's talk when it comes out in the
> Ensign. I myself have a difficult time seeing how people can
> still, with all due respect, "not get it" after hearing this talk.
And I have a difficult time seeing why people are so eager to twist an
apostle's words into sup
September 11th was a defining moment in history, it showed that America could be
attacked within her own borders; it didn't need an ICBM as has been the thinking.
It would be tragic that when (not if) it happens again; and what could be the outcome
(will cities not buildings lay waste)?
Lastel
Except for the problem of western militarism.
Gary Smith wrote:
> There is an easy solution to the Iraq problem. Instead of invading, just
> drop a major 20,000 ton bomb on one of his presidential compounds and
> flatten it. Then tell Saddam that every week we'll flatten another
> compound until
>There is an easy solution to the Iraq problem. Instead of invading, just
>drop a major 20,000 ton bomb on one of his presidential compounds and
>flatten it. Then tell Saddam that every week we'll flatten another
>compound until he agrees to let inspectors visit everywhere. Either way,
>the proble
There is an easy solution to the Iraq problem. Instead of invading, just
drop a major 20,000 ton bomb on one of his presidential compounds and
flatten it. Then tell Saddam that every week we'll flatten another
compound until he agrees to let inspectors visit everywhere. Either way,
the problem wil
Just read over Elder Nelson's talk when it comes out in the Ensign. I myself have a
difficult time seeing how people can still, with all due respect, "not
get it" after hearing this talk. He said "as a CHURCH we should renounce war" and
emphasized that it would be the descendants of Ishmael and
>It appears to me that is only a matter of time before Saddam does the
same.
>
>Should a nation sit back and let it happen or should there be a
response?
Saddam is a stupid idiot. I don't think he is any threat to the USA. I
think America needs to mind there own business and let the other
cou
Within the first chapters of the Book of Mormon it talks about Nephi chopping off the
head of Laban.
Toward the end of the Book of Mormon it talks about Mormon and Moroni warring against
the Lamanites.
In between, there is bloodshed and it gives me the impression as long as one is
fighting fo
I definitely find it interesting how his talk should bring the saints
back to where we should be: peacemakers. I have pondered much about the
war w/Iraq over the past month or two, and have concluded that I'll
support my country in whatever it decides, however I think we should back
off of war unt
I don't mean to belabour the point, but I'm sometimes amazed at the things you and I
agree on. This could be bad for your reputation, you know
"John W. Redelfs" wrote:
>
> I felt that it should throw a bucket of cold water on some of those saints who are
>in favor of a war with Iraq. He sa
At 03:48 PM 10/5/02 -0600 Marc A. Schindler favored us with:
>Elder Russell M. Nelson's talk -- did you notice his emphasis on how
>Ishmael and Jacob's cooperation following their father's death should
>serve as an example, that their present-day descendants should emerge as
>peacemakers in the re
Elder Russell M. Nelson's talk -- did you notice his emphasis on how
Ishmael and Jacob's cooperation following their father's death should
serve as an example, that their present-day descendants should emerge as
peacemakers in the region?
What think ye?
--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta
Actually, I do agree that this is a big mistake. Since probably at most
only 1/2 of your armed forces are fighting forces, when the Mexican army
reaches your border with the US, you may really miss those 2,000.
Jon
Marc A. Schindler wrote:
Canada ready to send 2 000 troops along with US forces
Canada ready to send 2 000 troops along with US forces to Iraq (this is
about the same that was committed in the Afghan conflict). Big mistake,
imo. But you probably already knew that.
http://www.canada.com/edmonton/story.asp?id={46C902C1-54EA-48C3-AF0D-328588B036B8}
--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce
19 matches
Mail list logo
