On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 08:41:57 -0600 Marc A. Schindler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Oh, I forgot to add. If you're interested in what's happened in the
27 years
since the Joseph Smith Papyri: an Egyptian Endowment was published,
try
http://www.fairlds.org/pubs/LBOA.pdf a piece of scholarship
Have you read any of his books? They're very stimulating. I'd recommend his book
which is really a collection of his essays which were published in The
Improvement Era, the predecessor to The Ensign. It's called Since Cumorah.
Another one which contains similar essays is a three-part book, Lehi
That's a nice looking site. do you mind if I link to it from mine? It'll be a
while -- probably a couple of weeks before I update my site, but I'm always
collecting links like this.
I've got two websites: The LDS Atlas of the World at www.gatheringofisrael.com,
but the one I'd include your link
At 03:24 AM 9/27/02 +0800 Mark Gregson favored us with:
Most of my glimpses of the bizarre subculture have not been while I have been a
bishop.
I have noticed that the male version of subculture weirdness tends towards the John
Pratt style i.e. esoteric doctrine whereas the female version
At 04:08 PM 9/26/02 -0600 Steven Montgomery favored us with:
I'm a fan of the truth, not necessarily John Pratt. Yet, In the spirit of Moses 6: 63
I have found much of John Pratt's research to be valid and based on the truth. I
admit that some of John Pratt's research is in the area of
No, it's Saturn that's in the telestial kingdom; its rings are composed of all
tthe lost singlesods d
Stephen Beecroft wrote:
Interesting post on AML Tuesday, which you can read in the AML archives
at
http://www.xmission.com/pub/lists/aml-list/archive/v01.n839
I know that Steven and a
Oh, that I were a bishop, and could get the inside scoop on all the bizarreness of
the Church membership! On the other hand, maybe not.
My experience is that most members don't share that sort of thing with the bishop.
Again, being an Edmonton area bishop might be different than a Utah
At 04:08 PM 9/26/02 -0600 Steven Montgomery favored us with:
As you can see, the program was symbolic and openly stated that it is based on his
own interpretation. Beside, I find John Pratt's research and viewpoint that the
stars, planets, constellations and calendar systems act to bear record
