John W. Redelfs" wrote:
> If God is a man, and he existed before the world, and he created the
world,
> how could mankind have evolved on this planet? I mean, how did God become
> a man?
I don't get your question, John. Perhaps I missed some context.
We know that there are millions of worlds on
Whatever.
> -Original Message-
> From: Stacy Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 11:50 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ZION] The Descent of Man
>
>
> Semantics, semantics. "Better" is probably not appropria
Semantics, semantics. "Better" is probably not appropriate, just more
detailed and less detailed.
Stacy.
At 12:31 PM 11/13/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Actually, I erred. Moses is good, Abraham is better.
--
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Actually, I erred. Moses is good, Abraham is better.
> -Original Message-
> From: Stacy Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 10:27 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ZION] The Descent of Man
>
>
> I guess I often thoug
I guess I often thought about the differences between the account of the
creation in the Book of Moses and the Book of Abraham. I think the one in
Abraham is far more detailed.
Stacy.
At 09:44 AM 11/13/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Gary:
Interesting speculation and observations.
I have long believ
Gary:
Interesting speculation and observations.
I have long believed that Book of Moses provides the most comprehensive and
broad scriptural presentation we have as to how God went about creating the
worlds. It provides a account that is quite instructive generally. Moreover,
it seems to suggest
> -Original Message-
> From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 3:33 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [ZION] The Descent of Man
>
>
> If God is a man, and he existed before the world, and he created
> the world,
> how could mankind have evol
