Jim the Babe wrote:
>
> John W. Redelfs wrote:
> ---
> I have some anxiety that we may soon find out who has and does not have
> nukes.
> ---
>
> There were some misleading news reports on this, I think. In the
> headlines last Friday. Those rotten news guys, they're always trying to
> increase
Jim Cobabe wrote:
> I was interested to learn that the Russians are now selling nuclear
> technological knowhow. What a refreshing change for the world to buy
> their nuclear plants from the Russians, instead of from the Canadians,
> or the PRC. Perhaps the Russian bid was cheaper. ;->
>
Thi
Glad to know I'm allowed to be anxious. I thought Jesus might condemn me
in this.
Stacy.
At 03:49 AM 12/17/2002 +, you wrote:
John W. Redelfs wrote:
---
I have some anxiety that we may soon find out who has and does not have
nukes.
---
///
John W. Redelfs wrote:
---
I have some anxiety that we may soon find out who has and does not have
nukes.
---
There were some misleading news reports on this, I think. In the
headlines last Friday. Those rotten news guys, they're always trying to
increase John's anxiety. :-)
Some of the he
Marc A. Schindler favored us with:
Is this a new thread, or a continuation of an old one? I didn't know Iran had
nukes.
I have some anxiety that we may soon find out who has and does not have
nukes. --JWR
//
/// ZION
Is this a new thread, or a continuation of an old one? I didn't know Iran had
nukes.
Chet wrote:
> May I see a show of hands of those who are surprised that there's been
> evidence since September? Now a show of hands that believe the
> facilities are for peaceful purposes?
>
> Y'know, after 196
Hey, no fair! I can't send graphic images of my hands. Lol.
Stacy.
At 12:08 AM 12/13/2002 +, you wrote:
May I see a show of hands of those who are surprised that there's been
evidence since September? Now a show of hands that believe the
facilities are for peaceful purposes?
Y'know, aft
