Re: [ZODB-Dev] ZODB memory problems (was: processing a Very Large file)

2005-05-31 Thread Christian Theune
Am Montag, den 30.05.2005, 23:59 -0400 schrieb Paul Winkler: > On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 11:11:52AM +0200, Christian Theune wrote: > > * Blocking during large streams is solved by a protocol extension for > > streaming blobs. Additionally you can make the ZEO-Clients share the > > Blob data via a net

RE: [ZODB-Dev] ZODB memory problems (was: processing a Very Largefile)

2005-05-31 Thread Tim Peters
[Paul Winkler] >> Cool! This is on ctheune-blobsupport branch, right? Did that ever get >> merged to trunk? [Christian Theune] > AFAIK not. It was a "maybe" for the 3.4 release but really didn't have > enough public exposure to make it in there. That's all correct. 3.4 is in beta now, so blob s

RE: [ZODB-Dev] ZODB memory problems (was: processing a Very Largefile)

2005-05-31 Thread Christian Theune
Am Dienstag, den 31.05.2005, 11:21 -0400 schrieb Tim Peters: > I hope there's action before September -- that would be half a year after > the branch was created, and merging gets harder over time. Maybe we could > do a virtual sprint via zodb-dev <0.9 wink>. Ok. There is not much todo except of

Re: [ZODB-Dev] ZODB memory problems

2005-05-31 Thread Shane Hathaway
Jeremy Hylton wrote: > It's really too bad that ZEO only allows a single outstanding request. > Restructuring the protocol to allow multiple simulatenous requests > was on the task list years ago, but the protocol implementation is so > complex I doubt it will get done :-(. I can't help but think

Re: [ZODB-Dev] ZODB memory problems

2005-05-31 Thread Toby Dickenson
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 18:43, Shane Hathaway wrote: > Jeremy Hylton wrote: > > It's really too bad that ZEO only allows a single outstanding request. > > Restructuring the protocol to allow multiple simulatenous requests > > was on the task list years ago, but the protocol implementation is so > >

RE: [ZODB-Dev] ZODB memory problems

2005-05-31 Thread Tim Peters
[Jeremy Hylton] >> It's really too bad that ZEO only allows a single outstanding request. >> Restructuring the protocol to allow multiple simulatenous requests >> was on the task list years ago, but the protocol implementation is so >> complex I doubt it will get done :-(. I can't help but think

RE: [ZODB-Dev] ZODB memory problems

2005-05-31 Thread Tim Peters
... [Toby Dickenson] > pb; perspective broker. I thought that suggestion was crazy when Jeremey > first presented it in his blog, but increasing exposure to other twisted > tools makes it seem more reasonable. Just thought I'd guess at the probably-intended references: http://www.python.org/

RE: [ZODB-Dev] ZODB memory problems (was: processing a Very Largefile)

2005-05-31 Thread Chris McDonough
Christian, Can we pick a day next week to have a sprint via IRC? Would you be willing to help write some tests during that sprint? On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 11:21 -0400, Tim Peters wrote: > [Paul Winkler] > >> Cool! This is on ctheune-blobsupport branch, right? Did that ever get > >> merged to trun

Re: [ZODB-Dev] ZODB memory problems

2005-05-31 Thread Shane Hathaway
Tim Peters wrote: > [Jeremy Hylton] > >>>It's really too bad that ZEO only allows a single outstanding request. >>> Restructuring the protocol to allow multiple simulatenous requests >>>was on the task list years ago, but the protocol implementation is so >>>complex I doubt it will get done :-(.