On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:17:17 +0300, Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Arve Knudsen wrote at 2006-4-23 22:44 +0300:
I already use ZODB as a local persistency service for my Python
application, now I'm considering ZEO as a distributed data source. The
thing is I don't want to keep my
2006 22:25:05 +0300, Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Arve Knudsen wrote at 2006-4-25 17:32 +0300:
...
How should I ensure local
ownership of objects from the ClientStorage, by deep copying them?
The ZODB does not have any ownership concept.
Zope, on the other hand has two: executable
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006 22:31:36 +0300, Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Arve Knudsen wrote at 2006-4-25 22:07 +0300:
I must say I'm not an expert on all things ZODB/ZEO, but what I meant by
ownership is the management of persistent objects. The cache management
logic of ZODB can the way I
, maybe ZODB should be a bit more
robust toward this sort of scenario?
Maybe a corresponding exception could be raised if the storage doesn't
exist on disk,
e.g. StorageMissing?
Arve
On 2/15/07, Arve Knudsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Dieter
On 2/14/07, Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
passes it's extensive test suite for me.
How did you install ZODB?
Jim
On Jul 11, 2007, at 9:22 AM, Arve Knudsen wrote:
Hi
I tried installing ZODB-3.8.0b2 on my Ubuntu system, but I can't
even import ZODB before it fails. The traceback is as follows:
Traceback (most recent call last
