Jim Fulton wrote:
>
> No one seems to be willing to step up and take responsibility.
> I guess everyone assumes I will.
>
> Jim
>
I'll take the responsibility of transforming the manual test to an
automated...
--
Godefroid Chapelle (aka __gotc
Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>> No one seems to be willing to step up and take responsibility.
>> I guess everyone assumes I will.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>
> I'll take the responsibility of transforming the manual tes
Tres Seaver wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
>> Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
>>> Jim Fulton wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> No one seems to be willing to step up and take responsibility.
.
I suspect I do not express myself correctly.
I try to say that repozo should be tested against a database being
mutated (the current test only exercise backups when the db is closed).
As far as I can understand, THE reason for repozo is to backup without
stopping the ZOD
customers. They rather have me
restore some content with a few minutes of work even at the cost (for
them) of undoing later transactions.
IOW, I'll support Martin's statement : step-by-step undo should be kept
if possible.
--
Godefroid Chapelle (aka __gotcha) http://bubblenet.be
ope I have not told too many silly things
--
Godefroid Chapelle (aka __gotcha) http://bubblenet.be
___
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.o
Le 31/12/10 02:02, Godefroid Chapelle a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I have been fighting all day to understand a bug with the unregistration
> of a utility from a local site.
>
> After unregistration, some instance is left in the _subscribers list of
> the utilities AdapterRegi
Le 31/12/10 04:08, Marius Gedminas a écrit :
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 02:02:36AM +0100, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
>> I have been fighting all day to understand a bug with the unregistration
>> of a utility from a local site.
>>
>> After unregistration, some instance
of us will be able to
participate.
Regards,
--
Godefroid Chapelle (aka __gotcha) http://bubblenet.be
___
For more information about ZODB, see http://zodb.org/
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
/6457bcfd07b3b77f240cbc6d60f222f0d40e8d5d
Before the fix, the test triggered a traceback very similar to the one
seen when migrating Plone.
As I am not an expert of ZODB internals, I'd like someone to review my
fix even if the test suite does not break.
Thanks
--
Godefroid Chapelle (aka __gotcha)
Le 17/09/13 10:44, Godefroid Chapelle a écrit :
Hi,
Plone 3 to 4 migration occasionally triggers a POSKeyError during
transaction commit. See
http://rpatterson.net/blog/poskeyerror-during-commit
I encountered the issue yesterday.
I committed a test and a fix in branch 3.10.
https
only ? Pull the fix and do some magic with the test so that
it runs only in Python 2 ? Other suggestion ?
Regards,
--
Godefroid Chapelle (aka __gotcha) http://bubblenet.be
___
For more information about ZODB, see http://zodb.org/
ZODB-Dev mailing list
reference to newly created objects
(iow in same transaction). And that the fix I propose makes sense anyway.
--
Godefroid Chapelle (aka __gotcha) http://bubblenet.be
--
Godefroid Chapelle (aka __gotcha) http://bubblenet.be
___
For more information about
thout acquisition is welcome.
Which other change is inappropriate ?
--
Godefroid Chapelle (aka __gotcha) http://bubblenet.be
___
For more information about ZODB, see http://zodb.org/
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/ma
cond
transaction hence does not need to participate in readCurrent dance.
This was a very long explanation which I hope will help to confirm the
fix or to come up with a better one.
PS: keep in mind that english is not my mothertongue.
--
Godefroid Chapelle (aka __gotcha) http://bubblenet.b
th a better one.
>
>PS: keep in mind that english is not my mothertongue.
:) You do very well.
I think your fix is correct. As you point out, It doesn't make sense to
guard against conflicts on new objects.
I think a cleaner test could be written using the co
tests might already be a good proof ?
Or should we be more prudent ?
If it would,
What do you mean by 'If it would' ?
then of course we should contribute
documentation and a test to the Python source tree.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton
Zope Corporation
--
Godefroid Cha
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Dec 6, 2007, at 2:40 PM, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Nov 6, 2007, at 2:40 PM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Despite this change there are still a huge amount
of unexplained calls to the 'persistent_id' method of the ObjectWriter
in serialize
Jim Fulton wrote:
It sounds like I should write some pickle and cPickle tests and we
should update the ZODB trunk to take advantage of this. (/me fears
gettimg mired in Python 3.)
Jim
Would you do that on Python 2.4, 2.5 or ... ?
--
Godefroid Chapelle (aka __gotcha) http://bubblenet.be
Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Dec 6, 2007, at 2:40 PM, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Nov 6, 2007, at 2:40 PM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Despite this change there are still a huge amount
of unexplained calls to the 'persistent_id' method of the
Ob
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Dec 7, 2007, at 10:55 AM, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
It sounds like I should write some pickle and cPickle tests and we
should update the ZODB trunk to take advantage of this. (/me fears
gettimg mired in Python 3.)
Jim
Would you do that on Python
e are usually very demanding with themselves, which leads to
the bad pattern of not advertizing our good stuff because it is not perfect.
Time to change our patterns, and advertize stuff before they are perfect ;-)
--
Godefroid Chapelle (aka __gotcha) http://bubblen
these scripts across your production ZODB?
>
> cheers
> alan
--
Godefroid Chapelle (aka __gotcha) http://bubblenet.be
___
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@z
Hi,
I found the following
https://weblion.psu.edu/trac/weblion/wiki/TemporaryStorageInZeo
where Weblion documents how to move temporary storage from each zeo
client to zeo server in Zope2.
I understand the pro (no need for sticky sessions). What would be the cons ?
Thanks
--
Godefroid
24 matches
Mail list logo
