to debug ZODB and understant what's
happening. Could be related to store files in the ZODB (so, in
postgres through relstorage) ?
Thanks in advance
--
Santi Camps
Earcon S.L. - http://www.earcon.com
- http://www.kmkey.com
___
For more
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Shane Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Santi Camps wrote:
I've 8 zope's with 4 threads each one, and I've seen more than 50 open
connections used by relstorage. I was hopping one connection per
thread, like postgressql adapters does
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Shane Hathaway sh...@hathawaymix.org wrote:
Santi Camps wrote:
We've been using RelStorage 1.1.c1 in production environments over
postgresql 8.1 for some time. It has been working really fine, but
yesterday we have a big problem packing a relstorage zodb
is not in Relstorage but in the data.
The only right ways to solve it is to disable pack-gc or try to fill
this tables correctly. Do you know any simple way to do it ?
Perhaps an export / import should fill this tables ?
Thanks a lot for your help
--
Santi Camps (Earcon S.L.)
http://www.earcon.com
http
as possible and let you
know the results
Regards
--
Santi Camps (Earcon S.L.)
http://www.earcon.com
http://www.kmkey.com
#!/usr/bin/env python
##
#
# Copyright (c) 2008 Zope Corporation and Contributors.
# All Rights
removing this 2
transactions and packing on a copy of the database, to see what
happens. The last pack on a copy works, but then the application
raises a KeyError 8, probably becouse this zoid is one of the affected
by the wrong transactions.
--
Santi Camps (Earcon S.L.)
http://www.earcon.com
http
of
intensive work, the server RAM is finished
Is that normal ? I'm making some mistake ? Anybody knows any way to solve it ?
Thanks in advance
--
Santi Camps (Earcon S.L.)
http://www.earcon.com
http://www.kmkey.com
___
For more information about ZODB, see
the same
tests in a FileStorage to be sure
Thanks for your help
--
Santi Camps (Earcon S.L.)
http://www.earcon.com
http://www.kmkey.com
___
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB
leaved default values there
Thanks again
--
Santi Camps (Earcon S.L.)
http://www.earcon.com
http://www.kmkey.com
___
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org
http
memory, but the question is why they are loaded.
Any ideas ?
Thanks
--
Santi Camps (Earcon S.L.)
http://www.earcon.com
http://www.kmkey.com
___
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/
ZODB-Dev mailing list
it to you to be known
(in fact, I don't know if the problem is in relstorage or in memcache). I'm
working with python2.4.6 and python-memcache module version 1.40
Thanks a lot for this new release of relstorage, the performance testings
are amazing
--
Santi Camps
KMKey hacker (http://www.kmkey.com
, query=query)
print rows.fetchone()
The question is, can I go on ? Or use same connections than relstorage
could cause problems at ZODB level ?
Thanks in advance
--
Santi Camps
KMKey hacker (http://www.kmkey.com)
Earcon S.L. (http://www.earcon.com
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Shane Hathaway sh...@hathawaymix.orgwrote:
On 11/24/2010 05:17 AM, Santi Camps wrote:
Hi all
I'm using relstorage for a long time with very good results. Until
know, I also use database adapters like ZPsycopgDA to connect the same
SQL database and store
username=replace(username::text, 'helpdesk_src',
'redesistemas')::bytea;
Where is stored the information about parent - children objects ? Is the
prev_tid field of object_state table ?
Thanks in advance
--
Santi Camps
KMKey hacker (http://www.kmkey.com)
Earcon S.L. (http://www.earcon.com
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Shane Hathaway sh...@hathawaymix.orgwrote:
On 02/10/2011 08:42 AM, Santi Camps wrote:
The objective is to duplicate a storage using different mount points.
For instance, if we have Database1 - mount_point_1 , create
Database2 and Database3 as copies
to unexisting or empty transactions.
So, information to garbage collection seems to be using a lot of space.
My specific question is: if I disable pack-gc, can I safety empty
object_ref table and free this space?
Thanks in advance
--
Santi Camps
KMKey hacker (http://www.kmkey.com)
Earcon S.L. (http
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Shane Hathaway sh...@hathawaymix.orgwrote:
On 07/12/2012 01:30 PM, Santi Camps wrote:
My specific question is: if I disable pack-gc, can I safety empty
object_ref table and free this space?
Certainly. However, most of the 23 GB probably consists of blobs
17 matches
Mail list logo
