Re: [ZODB-Dev] issue with new package layout

Jim Fulton wrote: Tim Peters wrote: [John Belmonte] I'm trying to update my experimental ZODB Debian package to 3.4.0a1. The new change of having version numbers hard-coded in file paths within the source package (e.g. Dependencies/BTrees-ZODB3-3.4.0a1) is very troubling. Not really new: for ZODB

Re: [ZODB-Dev] issue with new package layout

Tim Peters wrote: [John Belmonte] I'm trying to update my experimental ZODB Debian package to 3.4.0a1. The new change of having version numbers hard-coded in file paths within the source package (e.g. Dependencies/BTrees-ZODB3-3.4.0a1) is very troubling. Not really new: for ZODB it started with 3

RE: [ZODB-Dev] issue with new package layout

[John Belmonte] > I'm trying to update my experimental ZODB Debian package to 3.4.0a1. The > new change of having version numbers hard-coded in file paths within the > source package (e.g. Dependencies/BTrees-ZODB3-3.4.0a1) is very > troubling. Not really new: for ZODB it started with 3.3b1, last

[ZODB-Dev] issue with new package layout

I'm trying to update my experimental ZODB Debian package to 3.4.0a1. The new change of having version numbers hard-coded in file paths within the source package (e.g. Dependencies/BTrees-ZODB3-3.4.0a1) is very troubling. This means that any patch to the upstream source I try to maintain will s