On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 16:41:24 -0500
"Tim Peters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Chris McDonough]
> > ...
> > Does anyone want to use BTrees outside of a persistent hierarchy?
>
> Oh yes. Some people install ZODB _just_ to use in-memory BTrees, with
> no thought of persistence. This works fine. Sor
[Chris McDonough]
> ...
> Does anyone want to use BTrees outside of a persistent hierarchy?
Oh yes. Some people install ZODB _just_ to use in-memory BTrees, with
no thought of persistence. This works fine. Sorted containers are an
important data structure in some algorithms. In-memory BTrees ar
Chris McDonough wrote at 2006-3-2 22:03 -0500:
> ...
>The "ZODB" egg
>might include both ZODB and ZEO (these are linked inextricably) which
>depends on the "persistence" distribution. Transaction should be
>dependency-free (but probably isn't, I haven't gotten that far yet).
While ZEO is of
Chris McDonough wrote:
On Mar 3, 2006, at 11:46 AM, Jeremy Hylton wrote:
Go go!
I don't understand the eggs philosophy. (I succeeded in missing the
eggs talk twice at PyCon.) I don't think any of the pieces of ZODB
are very useful in isolation. You can't use persistent without
transaction,
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
...
Can't you make them separate eggs that depend on the other?
There's no point given the cyclic dependencies. You need everything
anyway, so we might as well have a single source distribution.
BTW, there is no such thing as a source egg, and given that ZODB
has requir
On Mar 3, 2006, at 11:47 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
BTW, the turbogears folks are interested in using transaction. The
transaction
package has shallow dependencies on ZODB. A nice start would be to
release
a separate transaction egg that doesn't depend on ZODB. (Hint,
we'll need a separate
we
On Mar 3, 2006, at 11:46 AM, Jeremy Hylton wrote:
Go go!
I don't understand the eggs philosophy. (I succeeded in missing the
eggs talk twice at PyCon.) I don't think any of the pieces of ZODB
are very useful in isolation. You can't use persistent without
transaction, and there isn't much that
Chris McDonough wrote:
I'm taking a stab at packaging the various pieces of ZODB as eggs. One
of the things I'd like to do is to separate the packages of ZODB that
are currently shipped together (BTrees, ZODB/ZEO, persistent
transaction, ZConfig) into separate packages, because each may a
On 3/2/06, Chris McDonough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mar 2, 2006, at 10:48 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mar 2, 2006, at 10:03 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
> >>
> >> persistence-3.6.0.egg (which would include persistent and BTrees
> >> modules).
> >> zodblib-3.6.0.egg (which would inclu
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 10:20:13AM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
| On Mar 3, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
|
| >| Well, yes. I've already done that. But it's a hack. The runtime
| >| dependencies aren't a problem, it's the build-time dependencies. I
| >| don't know of a way to say
On Mar 3, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
| Well, yes. I've already done that. But it's a hack. The runtime
| dependencies aren't a problem, it's the build-time dependencies. I
| don't know of a way to say "use this header file from this egg to
| build this other egg" in an egg set
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 09:52:43AM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
|
| On Mar 3, 2006, at 8:08 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
|
| >On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:03:48PM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
| >| I'm taking a stab at packaging the various pieces of ZODB as eggs.
| >| One of the things I'd like to
On Mar 3, 2006, at 8:08 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:03:48PM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
| I'm taking a stab at packaging the various pieces of ZODB as eggs.
| One of the things I'd like to do is to separate the packages of ZODB
| that are currently shipped together (
Chris McDonough wrote:
zodblib-3.6.0.egg (which would include ZODB and ZODB packages).
zodb-3.6.0.egg (which might be an empty "dependency" package that
As Gary noted, I can't see a reason to have these separate. They can
always be separated in the future if a real need arises.
--
Benji Yo
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:03:48PM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
| I'm taking a stab at packaging the various pieces of ZODB as eggs.
| One of the things I'd like to do is to separate the packages of ZODB
| that are currently shipped together (BTrees, ZODB/ZEO, persistent
| transaction, ZCo
On Mar 2, 2006, at 10:48 PM, Gary Poster wrote:
On Mar 2, 2006, at 10:03 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
persistence-3.6.0.egg (which would include persistent and BTrees
modules).
zodblib-3.6.0.egg (which would include ZODB and ZODB packages).
transaction-3.6.0.egg (which would include only th
On Mar 2, 2006, at 10:03 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
persistence-3.6.0.egg (which would include persistent and BTrees
modules).
zodblib-3.6.0.egg (which would include ZODB and ZODB packages).
transaction-3.6.0.egg (which would include only the transaction
package).
zconfig-2.3.1.egg (which
I'm taking a stab at packaging the various pieces of ZODB as eggs.
One of the things I'd like to do is to separate the packages of ZODB
that are currently shipped together (BTrees, ZODB/ZEO, persistent
transaction, ZConfig) into separate packages, because each may
arguably be useful outsi
18 matches
Mail list logo
