On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 07:35:10PM +0200, Christian Theune wrote:
> [...] and I'm working on an offline migration script that should be
> completed by tomorrow.
The offline migration script is completed.
I'm currently trying to make the tests run on windows. The code probably does
run, but I get
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 07:55:17PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
>
>
> --On 19. Juni 2008 14:31:47 +0200 Martijn Faassen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Christian Theune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> We propose to keep both implementa
--On 19. Juni 2008 14:31:47 +0200 Martijn Faassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi there,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Christian Theune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
We propose to keep both implementations around and allow to select which
one to use. We would extend the FileSystemHelp
Me again,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 01:38:38PM +0200, Christian Theune wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We propose to introduce a new mode for the blob storage which breaks the
> directory structure into one level per byte of the oid. This would lead to
> directories 0x00-0xFF nested in 8 levels.
I implemented a
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 09:29:13AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> We propose to introduce a new mode for the blob storage which breaks
>> the
>> directory structure into one level per byte of the oid. This would
>> lead to
>> directories 0x00-0xFF nested in 8 levels.
>
> +1
>
> ...
>
>> We pr
On Jun 19, 2008, at 7:38 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
one of our installations hit a scalability limits with the current
blob
directory structure.
The current structure looks like:
\blobs\
\
.blob
.blob
...
\
...
...\
We hit a limit with a database
Hi there,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:38 PM, Christian Theune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> We propose to keep both implementations around and allow to select which one
> to use. We would extend the FileSystemHelper to abstract the two strategies.
Could the default be to choose the more scala
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 08:00:27AM -0400, Benji York wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Christian Theune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We propose to introduce a new mode for the blob storage which breaks the
> > directory structure into one level per byte of the oid. This would lead to
> >
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 7:38 AM, Christian Theune <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We propose to introduce a new mode for the blob storage which breaks the
> directory structure into one level per byte of the oid. This would lead to
> directories 0x00-0xFF nested in 8 levels.
I suppose the directories