Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: Zeo Server as a single point of failure
Hi Shane. Not sure if you have been following the whole thread or not. In any case, I had committed to maintaining DirectoryStorage a little while ago and it will be releasing in the near future under a new license. I think it is a good project too and I am excited about bringing it up to date :-). Once I have finished with the packaging, a bit of clean up and a first commit done of the updated source to sourceforge, I am hoping you may be interested in participating in ts development and co-maintaining it with me. If so, I can provide you with access once the new code has landed in the repository. I am happy that there is genuine interest for this storage though it is not widely deployed. I have a continued interest in RelStorage (formerly PGStorage). Though I cannot commit to svn, I'd be happy to help with a buildout configuration that could apply the ZODB patch also. Had you though about putting into the z3c namespace. Many thanks. Regards, David Shane Hathaway wrote: Tres Seaver wrote: What does Shane have to do with DirectoryStorage? For the record: I am not at all associated with DirectoryStorage, other than I think it's a good project. Shane ___ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev ___ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: Zeo Server as a single point of failure
Tres Seaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Pratt wrote: Hi Alan. I'm keeping the thread on the list since you raised the issue here. There are several repositories of zope related code that exist outside of svn.zope.org. I have made the decision to host DirectoryStorage at sourceforge on the basis that I have committed to maintaining and contributing to the project. I volunteered to maintain the project since I saw it falling into disrepair following two years without a single commit to the code base. I have become the maintainer on the basis of an agreement with Tobi back in January. This agreement permits me to relicense the code under my choice of a ZPL or MIT license. I cannot work with sources in zope repository since it would require a contributor agreement with Zope Corp. I am unable to enter into this agreement for the forseeable future. The zif collective (zif.sourceforge.net) is a way that I may contribute back to the zope community without the requirement of the agreement. You don't identify the problem(s) which prevent you from entering into that agreement: we might be able to clarify or help resolve them if you did so. Hi Tres. Any discussion of the ZCA will have to occur another day. I am not seeking a way to enter the agreement or to resolve anything publicly. Toby and I made these arrangements a couple months back and have committed to ongoing communication. It should be pointed out that users of the code will be getting releases from a package index in future. More important than the location of the repository is the fact the code will be eggified, maintained and there will be future releases. Regards, David ___ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: Zeo Server as a single point of failure
Tres Seaver wrote: What does Shane have to do with DirectoryStorage? For the record: I am not at all associated with DirectoryStorage, other than I think it's a good project. Shane ___ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: Zeo Server as a single point of failure
Hi Martijn. Probably not at this point. Unfortunately, the assignment of IP and contribution to open source are not synonymous. Perhaps when the relationship between ZC and ZF is clearer it could be reconsidered in future. Regards, David Martijn Faassen wrote: Hey, David Pratt wrote: [snip] I cannot work with sources in zope repository since it would require a contributor agreement with Zope Corp. I am unable to enter into this agreement for the forseeable future. The zif collective (zif.sourceforge.net) is a way that I may contribute back to the zope community without the requirement of the agreement. Just out of interest, would a contributor agreement with the Zope Foundation be any better for you? Regards, Martijn ___ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev ___ For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki: http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/ ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
