On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 07:13:56PM +0200, Renaud Manus wrote:
Sure :-)
Both Sun Cluster and AVS introduce new services. Some of them
(eg. global-devices system/nws_scm) are dependent on
milestone/single-user and add filesystem/local as their dependent.
If we were to move filesystem/local
hello,
I am currently setting up a home server. It will be my main storage server,
but I will also be consolidating other applications on it (voip server,
video streaming, app server, ...)
I plan to use a Quad-core processor (namely the Q6600) with 8GB of RAM.
I have been reading all the docs I
Hello Vincent,
From your message, it appears that you do not need to use capped-cpu.
However, if you find that you have a need to use both, it will work,
although there is potential to confuse Solaris and/or yourself. For
example, what happens if you set cpu-shares so that a zone must get at
Narendra Kumar S.S wrote:
Is there any particular reason, why you are not proposing to move
filesystem/local to single-user milestone.
That was option #1 in my list. However, there were those who objected
to changing the definition of single-user mode in this way. In
addition, there
Thanks for your help,
Comments below ...
On 9/2/08, Jeff Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Vincent,
From your message, it appears that you do not need to use capped-cpu.
However, if you find that you have a need to use both, it will work,
although there is potential to confuse Solaris
See http://tinyurl.com/5jwe3l , but here's the brief version:
Basic, which can be modified by the owner of the calling process
Privileged, which can be modified only by privileged (superuser) callers
System, which is fixed for the duration of the operating system instance
On
