On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Timothy Kennedy wrote:
> That's correct. I have some solaris 8 zones running under cluster
> control, where zonepath is zfs, and they're doing just fine.
> Nothing special had to be done.
Excellent! Just the news I was hoping for.
Thanks again,
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA,
Le 25 févr. 09 à 23:12, Timothy Kennedy a écrit :
Rich Teer wrote:
I have a situation where I need to consolidate a few servers running
Solaris 9 and 8. If the application doesn't run natively on Solaris
10 or Nevada, I was thinking of using Solars 9 or 8 branded zones.
My intent would be fo
Rich Teer wrote:
I have a situation where I need to consolidate a few servers running
Solaris 9 and 8. If the application doesn't run natively on Solaris
10 or Nevada, I was thinking of using Solars 9 or 8 branded zones.
My intent would be for the global zone to use ZFS boot/root; would I
be
On 02/24/09 21:26, Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Bangalore, Suresh
wrote:
Hi Mike
The netmask is /24.
Thanks
Suresh
This implies that you have three different subnets and you either have
three distinct cables going to the machine or you are using three
VLANs.
In the gl
Hi all,
I have a situation where I need to consolidate a few servers running
Solaris 9 and 8. If the application doesn't run natively on Solaris
10 or Nevada, I was thinking of using Solars 9 or 8 branded zones.
My intent would be for the global zone to use ZFS boot/root; would I
be correct in th
Hi,
another update:
For further tests I created a new non-global zone with an exclusive IP
stack and a virtual nic and the dhcp server works there.
I even did not configure the additional privileges like in the other
zone, so the zone configuration is :
$ zonecfg -z dhcpserver info
zonename:
