On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Vincent Boisard wrote:
> Thanks for your help,
>
> Let me summarize this:
>
> - Shared IP has the advantage that the global zone fully administers the
> network: zone don't have to (and even CAN'T) bother with it. There may be a
> slight advantage performance wise.
On 04/28/09 06:09, Vincent Boisard wrote:
Thanks for your help,
Let me summarize this:
- Shared IP has the advantage that the global zone fully administers the
network: zone don't have to (and even CAN'T) bother with it. There may
be a slight advantage performance wise.
Yes. I would expect
Thanks for your help,
Let me summarize this:
- Shared IP has the advantage that the global zone fully administers the
network: zone don't have to (and even CAN'T) bother with it. There may be a
slight advantage performance wise.
- Exclusive IP with VNIC is needed for some features and enables ban
On 04/27/09 13:40, Vincent Boisard wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am wondering, as Crossbow is now integrated, does it still make sense
to use Shared IP Zones or is it better to use exclusive-ip zones with a
vnic for each of them.
With a vnic, we can benefit from the bandwidth management and al, but
t
Hi everyone,
I am wondering, as Crossbow is now integrated, does it still make sense to
use Shared IP Zones or is it better to use exclusive-ip zones with a vnic
for each of them.
With a vnic, we can benefit from the bandwidth management and al, but they
may be performance issues...
What do you t