[zones-discuss] dhcp/zone
Hi, I want to install dhcp on local zone... OS : # uname -a SunOS esp43 5.10 Generic_127111-02 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V490 # zoneadm list -cv ID NAME STATUS PATH BRANDIP 0 global running/ native shared 2 esp43 running/export/zones/esp43 native shared Is dhcp can run on this local zone ? As I have NIC=ce, I think, I can't set up exclusive-Ip zone Thanks ae - Nouveau : téléphonez moins cher avec Yahoo! Messenger ! Découvez les tarifs exceptionnels pour appeler la France et l'international.Téléchargez la version beta.___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] dhcp/zone
IIRC, you need to have ip-type=exclusive to have DHCP work in a non-global zone. Currently ce doesn't support exclusive IP stack, but I remember seeing an RFE somewhere that'd allow exclusive/ce combo. Perhaps this has already been fixed in Open Solaris, I'm not sure. Thanks, Zoram elkhaoul elkhaoul wrote: Hi, I want to install dhcp on local zone... OS : # uname -a SunOS esp43 5.10 Generic_127111-02 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V490 # zoneadm list -cv ID NAME STATUS PATH BRANDIP 0 global running/ native shared 2 esp43 running/export/zones/esp43 native shared Is dhcp can run on this local zone ? As I have NIC=ce, I think, I can't set up exclusive-Ip zone Thanks ae - Nouveau : téléphonez moins cher avec Yahoo! Messenger ! Découvez les tarifs exceptionnels pour appeler la France et l'international.Téléchargez la version beta. ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org -- Zoram Thanga::Sun Cluster Development::http://blogs.sun.com/zoram ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] dhcp/zone
DHCP client or server in Zones only works with IP Exclusives. -- Renaud Hi, I want to install dhcp on local zone... OS : # uname -a SunOS esp43 5.10 Generic_127111-02 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V490 # zoneadm list -cv ID NAME STATUS PATH BRAND IP 0 global running/ native shared 2 esp43 running/export/zones/esp43 native shared Is dhcp can run on this local zone ? As I have NIC=ce, I think, I can't set up exclusive-Ip zone Thanks ae Nouveau : téléphonez moins cher avec Yahoo! Messenger ! Découvez les tarifs exceptionnels pour appeler la France et l'international. Téléchargez http://us.rd.yahoo.com/messenger/mail_taglines/default/*http://fr.beta.messenger.yahoo.com la version beta. ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
[zones-discuss] exclusive-ip
Hi, I configure a local zone as exclusive-ip ## zonecfg -z zone1 . ... set ip-type=exclusive ...add net set physical=ce0 ... end But when I boot the zone, I don't see any inteface ### ifconfig -a lo0: flags=2001000849UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL mtu 8232 index 1 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff00 Is there extra configuration ? Thanks a lot _ Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail http://mail.yahoo.fr___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
[zones-discuss] exclusive-ip
Hi, I set up exclusive-ip zone, using theses instructions : set ip-type=excluse add net set physical=ce When I boot the zone, I don't see physical interface anymore zone1# ifconfig -a lo0: flags=2001000849UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL mtu 8232 index 1 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff00 Is there other configuration to add ? Thanks a lot carol This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] exclusive-ip
On 11 Dec 2007, at 13:23, caroline wrote: Hi, I set up exclusive-ip zone, using theses instructions : set ip-type=excluse add net set physical=ce The ce interface currently cannot be used with exclusive ip instances. Look at the crosbow faq for supported network interfaces: http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/crossbow/faq/#ipinst_any_nic Paul When I boot the zone, I don't see physical interface anymore zone1# ifconfig -a lo0: flags=2001000849UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL mtu 8232 index 1 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff00 Is there other configuration to add ? Thanks a lot carol This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
[zones-discuss] installing solaris8 - failed
Hello, I'v failed to install solaris8 on solaris10. I'v patched all required patchs, but I had below log and failed. What should I check ? = [2007년 12월 11일 화요일 오후 09시 07분 14초] Log File: /var/tmp/sol8.install.1410.log [2007년 12월 11일 화요일 오후 09시 07분 14초]Product: Solaris 8 Migration Assistant 1.0 [2007년 12월 11일 화요일 오후 09시 07분 14초] Installer: solaris8 brand installer 1.19 [2007년 12월 11일 화요일 오후 09시 07분 14초] Zone: sol8 [2007년 12월 11일 화요일 오후 09시 07분 14초] Path: /export/zones/sol8 [2007년 12월 11일 화요일 오후 09시 07분 14초] Starting pre-installation tasks. [2007년 12월 11일 화요일 오후 09시 07분 14초] Installation started for zone sol8 [2007년 12월 11일 화요일 오후 09시 07분 14초] Source: /export/home0/chakra/solaris8-image.flar [2007년 12월 11일 화요일 오후 09시 07분 14초] Media Type: flash archive [2007년 12월 11일 화요일 오후 09시 07분 14초] Installing: This may take several minutes... [2007년 12월 11일 화요일 오후 09시 07분 14초] cd /export/zones/sol8/root [2007년 12월 11일 화요일 오후 09시 07분 14초] flar split -f -S archive /export/home0/chakra/solaris8-image.flar [2007년 12월 11일 화요일 오후 09시 07분 14초] mv archive __SUNW__p2v__archive__1410 [2007년 12월 11일 화요일 오후 09시 07분 14초] cd __SUNW__p2v__archive__1410 [2007년 12월 11일 화요일 오후 09시 07분 14초] mv .SunDownloadManager .Xauthority .bash_history .bash_profile .bashrc .ccache .gconf .gconfd .mc .mysql_history .profile .ssh .subversion .sunstudio .sunw .viminfo .vimrc InstallShield TT_DB bin cdrom chakra chakra.old dev devices etc export home kernel lib lost+found mnt net opt platform proc sbin sqlnet.log system tmp usr var vol .. [2007년 12월 11일 화요일 오후 09시 07분 14초] cd - /dev/null [2007년 12월 11일 화요일 오후 09시 07분 14초] rmdir __SUNW__p2v__archive__1410 error /export/home0/chakra/solaris8-image.flar can't handle achive file... (the message is translated from korean..) [2007년 12월 11일 화요일 오후 09시 12분 28초] Postprocessing: This may take several minutes... [2007년 12월 11일 화요일 오후 09시 12분 28초] running: p2v sol8 touch: /export/zones/sol8/root/etc/mnttabchmod: This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] exclusive-ip
Robert Smicinski writes: We have the same problem, none of our interfaces show up on ce's, bge's, qfe's or ge's on sparc. It does work on one of our x86 machines though. Maybe it's related to sparc? It's not SPARC that's the problem. The problem is that the IP Instances feature (exclusive-ip) currently supports only GLDv3 interfaces. Any interface implemented using GLDv3 will work, regardless of platform. ce, qfe, and ge are (or at least _were_) monolithic DLPI designs, not GLD-based. It's also pretty important to know that version matters here, so describe the system you're using. Quite a few changes have gone into OpenSolaris-based distributions that haven't gotten back (and may never get back) to S10. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] exclusive-ip
Robert Smicinski writes: I don't see that reference in the Sun What's New Solaris 10 8/07 Release: http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-0547/6mgbdbsoa?l=ena=viewq=ip+instances I don't see a reference to the issue there, either. I think that's probably a documentation bug. The issue is with the design of the driver. If it uses GLDv3, then zoneadmd can issue a special new ioctl to move the link into the zone. If it doesn't use GLDv3, then that doesn't work. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] zone.max-processes
Steve Lawrence wrote: We have a generic rctl/global-zone safety issue that needs to be addressed. It would seem simple enough to just make project 0 processes in the global zone exempt from zone rctls. This would allow apps in the global zone to be capped without affecting system daemons. The rational is that system daemons need resources or the system can become unusable. The hole in this solution is that, by default, root logins join the user.root project. A fix could be to make root's default project system instead of user.root. This would be a significant change. Another option would be to document that admin's change root's default project to system if configuring rctls on the global zone. We could even print a warning if configuring via zonecfg -z global. Comments? Steve, making only the system project exempt from the zone rctl to ensure proper system operation seems reasonable to me. I am not sure about the 'make the system project root's default project' bit. We don't do that for zone.max-lwps, do we? Setting zone.max-lwps too low in the global zone will render the system as unusable as when setting zone.max-processes too low, yet we don't cater specifically for the well being of the system in the zone.max-lwps case, so why do it for zone.max-processes? We threaten the admin with fire and brimstone when he/she sets max-lwps using zonecfg, but other than that, we do nothing else. Given that the intended use of zone.max-processes is mainly for non-global zones, I think it is reasonable to expect that the majority of admins won't be setting zone.* rctls on the global zone. Preventing those that want to from doing so by making the global zone exempt from the zone rctl seems overly protective. The current warning by zonecfg(1M) and a new stern warning in the zonecfg(1M) man page should suffice to make the admin aware of the dangers. So the only thing exempt from project.max-processes and zone.max-processes would be processes in the system project in the global zone for the reason you stated. For non-global zones, the zone limit will be an unconditional limit (no exemption for anyone since the rctl is meant to protect the system and other non-global zones from a rogue zone). Menno -- Menno Lageman - Sun Microsystems - http://blogs.sun.com/menno ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] dhcp/zone
Hello Zoram, Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 9:41:13 AM, you wrote: ZT IIRC, you need to have ip-type=exclusive to have DHCP work in a ZT non-global zone. Currently ce doesn't support exclusive IP stack, but I ZT remember seeing an RFE somewhere that'd allow exclusive/ce combo. ZT Perhaps this has already been fixed in Open Solaris, I'm not sure. IIRC someone from Sun wrote some time ago it won't rather happen (GLDv3 version of ce) - unfortunately. -- Best regards, Robert Milkowski mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://milek.blogspot.com ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] dhcp/zone
On Dec 11, 2007 3:10 AM, elkhaoul elkhaoul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I want to install dhcp on local zone... OS : # uname -a SunOS esp43 5.10 Generic_127111-02 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V490 # zoneadm list -cv ID NAME STATUS PATH BRANDIP 0 global running/ native shared 2 esp43 running/export/zones/esp43 native shared Is dhcp can run on this local zone ? Contrary to what everyone else says, with a bit of customization dhcpd can run zones just fine. Solaris 10 update 3 and later (I forget which Nevada build) have all the required bits in place. http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/install-discuss/2007-March/004266.html -- Mike Gerdts http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/ ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] dhcp/zone
Contrary to what everyone else says, with a bit of customization dhcpd can run zones just fine. Solaris 10 update 3 and later (I forget which Nevada build) have all the required bits in place. http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/install-discuss/2007-March/004266.html Yep, it can be made to work, though I don't think it's officially supported. When I last looked at this issue, the changes needed to the source to make it work without any special tweaks was straightforward. -- meem ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] dhcp/zone
On Dec 11, 2007 9:37 PM, Peter Memishian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Contrary to what everyone else says, with a bit of customization dhcpd can run zones just fine. Solaris 10 update 3 and later (I forget which Nevada build) have all the required bits in place. http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/install-discuss/2007-March/004266.html Yep, it can be made to work, though I don't think it's officially supported. When I last looked at this issue, the changes needed to the source to make it work without any special tweaks was straightforward. If you offer up hints, I make take this on in the future. I've got a couple other things I want to work on before this one, though. -- Mike Gerdts http://mgerdts.blogspot.com/ ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] exclusive-ip
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 12:04:02PM +, Caroline Carol wrote: Hi, I configure a local zone as exclusive-ip ## zonecfg -z zone1 . ... set ip-type=exclusive ...add net set physical=ce0 ... end But when I boot the zone, I don't see any inteface ### ifconfig -a lo0: flags=2001000849UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL mtu 8232 index 1 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff00 Is there extra configuration ? You have to configure its network as it was a new server. Regards przemol -- http://przemol.blogspot.com/ -- Diverse Extreme Team Goes Dakar http://link.interia.pl/f1ca9 ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
