Performing lucreate and luupgrade from 10 03/05 to 10 10/08, and I get these
odd messages. Anyone seen them and what should I be concerned about?
sudo luupgrade -u -n Sol10Oct08 -s /mnt
42092 blocks
miniroot filesystem is lofs
Mounting miniroot at /mnt/Solaris_10/Tools/Boot
Validating the
Hi
what was the lucreate command that was run, is there zfs actually
involved, ie zones on zfs, need to see more data, as this would seem
that an old zfs pool was involved.
Enda
Larry Forsyth wrote:
Performing lucreate and luupgrade from 10 03/05 to 10 10/08, and I get these
odd messages.
Hi Enda,
lucreate -n Sol10Oct08 -m /:/dev/md/dsk/d2:ufs -m -:/dev/md/dsk/d4:swap -m
/var:/dev/md/dsk/d8:ufs
No zfs ever used on this server.
Very odd to us here.
Let me know if you have further questions.
Larry
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Hi
what version of 121430|121431 9 sparc|x86 ) is beign used?
ie patchadd -p |grep 121430
Enda
Larry Forsyth wrote:
Hi Enda,
lucreate -n Sol10Oct08 -m /:/dev/md/dsk/d2:ufs -m -:/dev/md/dsk/d4:swap -m
/var:/dev/md/dsk/d8:ufs
No zfs ever used on this server.
Very odd to us here.
Let me
Hi
So I have logged bug
6898159 luupgrade on systems with zfs is giving zfs errors
problem is with an lu script that now depends on zpool version 10 (
delivered in update 6, or 137137-09 )
so you have less than 137137-09 ( u6 Ku ) active, uname -a will tell.
but it is harmless at the same
Hi...
l_for...@mspbkp02:/usr/home/l_forsyt 0 uname -a
SunOS mspbkp02 5.10 Generic_118833-36 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V440
so you're saying this is a zfs issue?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zones-discuss mailing list
Muhammed Syyid wrote:
Hi
I'm looking to setup a few VM's with Centos 4.x/5.x. I had a couple of questions
1) From what I understand I can do this using both Xen or Zones, is that
accurate?
My understanding is both Xen and Zones would allow some form of Centos,
however with Xen, you would
Larry Forsyth wrote:
Hi...
l_for...@mspbkp02:/usr/home/l_forsyt 0 uname -a
SunOS mspbkp02 5.10 Generic_118833-36 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V440
so you're saying this is a zfs issue?
Hi
No, it'd an Lu issue, it is using a zfs property that only exists if you
have 137137-09 ( the u6 ) active,
understood.
I am continuing with my live upgrade. Hopefully this will get resolved for
others in the future.
Thanks for your assistance!
Larry
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
hey all,
so with my recent zoneadm mount putback i broke the native brand on
nevada. i've got a webrev with the one line fix here:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~edp/onnv-zmount2
6898056 native zones no longer boot: zone 'public': missing or invalid brand
Ed, looks
On 11/ 4/09 11:53 AM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
hey all,
so with my recent zoneadm mount putback i broke the native brand on
nevada. i've got a webrev with the one line fix here:
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~edp/onnv-zmount2
6898056 native zones no longer boot: zone 'public': missing or invalid
11 matches
Mail list logo
