Re: [zones-discuss] Re: improved zones/RM integration

2006-06-29 Thread Renaud Manus
Jerry Jelinek wrote: You don't have to reboot to make FSS the default and have all of the global zones processes running under FSS. Instead, you can do something like this: # dispadmin -d FSS # dispadmin -u # priocntl -s -c FSS -i all # priocntl -s -c FSS -i pid 1

Re: [zones-discuss] nofiles(descriptors) 1000

2006-09-29 Thread Renaud Manus
Carisdad wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No - it must have changed because of an applied patch. Perhaps 118855-15 No; it *must* be something you did. Nothing ever set the limit to 1000 for both. This persists across reboots. Pool resource controls? .files? BTW Casper - c

Re: [zones-discuss] zone config issues

2006-10-06 Thread Renaud Manus
SUNWcsr pkgmap defines /etc/pam.conf as a 'e' (editable) type file with a class action script 'pamconf'. In this situation, when you install a new zone, when it comes to install the SUNWcsr package, the class action script will just copy the file from /var/sadm/pkg/SUNWcsr/save/... to [ZONEROOTPAT

Re: [zones-discuss] Re: making local zone's /var a separate filesystem

2006-12-11 Thread Renaud Manus
You should be able to apply the patch if the local zones are booted in single-user mode too. -- Renaud Andreas Koppenhoefer wrote: This is a bug in patchadd, 6438808, the fix is currently under test and should appear on SunSolve shortly, days that is. The patch is 119254-31 ( sparc ) Unfor

Re: [zones-discuss] Re: Zone start order

2007-03-07 Thread Renaud Manus
I would not disable svc:/system/zones service because it can still be used to start and stop zones that do not depend on other zones. On the contrary, I would make the newly created services also dependent on svc:/system/zones and make sure the zones that need to start in a specific order have au

Re: [zones-discuss] pool under zone question

2007-04-03 Thread Renaud Manus
Not a good idea. These entries were removed from /etc/init.d/sysetup because they were migrated to SMF services: svc:/system/pools:default svc:/system/pools/dynamic:default svc:/system/scheduler:default If you have 122539-05 (included in 118833-36) + 120629-03, then it should be sufficient to e

Re: [zones-discuss] Re: Moving sparse Zones

2007-04-27 Thread Renaud Manus
125833-03 (sparc) 125834-03 (x86) -- Renaud Original Message Subject: [zones-discuss] Re: Moving sparse Zones From: prakash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org Date: Fri Apr 27 2007 15:13:33 GMT+0200 (CEST) Hi, I couldn't find the 125834-03 patch for spar

Re: [zones-discuss] Re: Moving sparse Zones

2007-04-27 Thread Renaud Manus
You first need to install the packages and then apply the patch. You cannot install the packages from the patch... -- Renaud Original Message Subject: [zones-discuss] Re: Moving sparse Zones From: prakash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org Date: Fri Apr 27

Re: [zones-discuss] create command question

2007-06-11 Thread Renaud Manus
Original Message Subject: [zones-discuss] create command question From: F.V.(Phil)Porcella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org Date: Mon Jun 11 2007 19:17:21 GMT+0200 (MEST) ***Hi, ***I was hoping to get an answer a question about create vs create -b. ***In

Re: [zones-discuss] zones and cpu shares

2007-07-19 Thread Renaud Manus
Original Message Subject: [zones-discuss] zones and cpu shares From: Niklas Jonsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: zones-discuss@opensolaris.org Date: Thu Jul 19 2007 10:58:44 GMT+0200 (CEST) > Hi, > > I have 5 zones on my machine, > > I would like to change the cpu-shares for all th

Re: [zones-discuss] zones and cpu shares

2007-07-19 Thread Renaud Manus
With cpu-shares, resources are shared but you're not guaranteed that a zone gets a minimum of 50% cpu share available *all* the time. -- Renaud Original Message Subject: Re:[zones-discuss] zones and cpu shares From: Renaud Manus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Niklas Jons

Re: [zones-discuss] zones and cpu shares

2007-07-19 Thread Renaud Manus
Original Message Subject: Re:[zones-discuss] zones and cpu shares From: Jeff Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Niklas Jonsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, zones-discuss@opensolaris.org Date: Thu Jul 19 2007 16:23:13 GMT+0200 (CEST) > Renaud Manus wro

Re: [zones-discuss] FSS default share for global zone

2007-08-13 Thread Renaud Manus
Currently in Solaris Express and soon in S10U4, you can set persistent values for global zone parameters (using zonecfg): pool cpu-shares capped-memory dedicated-cpu -- Renaud Original Message Subject: [zones-discuss] FSS default share for global zone From: Robert Milkowski

Re: [zones-discuss] Writing to /usr/.......... in a zone

2007-10-26 Thread Renaud Manus
If your zone need to write to /usr then you should create a whole root zone (rather than inherit /usr from the global zone). cf. http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zones/faq/#cfg_wholeroot -- Renaud Original Message Subject: [zones-discuss] Writing to /usr/.. in

Re: [zones-discuss] dhcp/zone

2007-12-11 Thread Renaud Manus
DHCP client or server in Zones only works with IP Exclusives. -- Renaud > Hi, > > I want to install dhcp on local zone... > OS : > # uname -a > SunOS esp43 5.10 Generic_127111-02 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V490 > # zoneadm list -cv > ID NAME STATUS PATH

Re: [zones-discuss] dhcp zone

2008-01-14 Thread Renaud Manus
A local zone can be a DHCP client/server if you can use IP Instance: http://opensolaris.org/os/project/crossbow/faq/#ipinst_dhcpclient -- Renaud Caroline Carol wrote: > Hi all, > > Is dhcp working in local zone ? > May be there is a version for this issue. > > Thanks a lot for your answe

Re: [zones-discuss] Zone File System type compatibility and liveupgrade

2008-01-16 Thread Renaud Manus
UFS only. See the doc. http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-0175/6nbucqmgb?a=view -- Renaud - Original Message - From: Pascal Fortin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 11:36 am Subject: [zones-discuss] Zone File System type compatibility and liveupgrade To: zones-discu

Re: [zones-discuss] Patches via Live Upgrade with 2 zones on Solaris 10 Update 4 failed

2008-03-06 Thread Renaud Manus
Eric Ham wrote: > > I then ran the following Live Upgrade and PCA commands with no errors. > > lumake -s sol10-2007-08 -n d2 > lumount d2 > ./pca -R /.alt.d2 --install > luumount d2 > lurename -e d2 -n sol10p-20080229 > luactivate sol10p-20080229 > init 6 > live-upgrade patching should be don

Re: [zones-discuss] Patches via Live Upgrade with 2 zones on Solaris 10 Update 4 failed

2008-03-06 Thread Renaud Manus
Jordan Brown wrote: > Renaud Manus wrote: >> Eric Ham wrote: >>> I then ran the following Live Upgrade and PCA commands with no errors. >>> >>> lumake -s sol10-2007-08 -n d2 >>> lumount d2 >>> ./pca -R /.alt.d2 --install >>> luumount

Re: [zones-discuss] Patches via Live Upgrade with 2 zones on Solaris 10 Update 4 failed

2008-03-06 Thread Renaud Manus
Sorry, it's '-t' and not '-p'. -- Renaud Eric Ham wrote: > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Renaud Manus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Jordan Brown wrote: >> > Renaud Manus wrote: >> >> Eric Ham wrote: >> >&g

Re: [zones-discuss] zone install

2008-06-27 Thread Renaud Manus
Maciej Browarski wrote: > Hello, > When I type zone install, all packages from global zone are installed in > non-global zone. > How can I select packages which I like to have in non-global zone > (similar configuration when install solaris 10 and we can custom > install) ? You cannot do it

Re: [zones-discuss] [smf-discuss] Possible solution to automated installation of "single user" patches

2008-09-01 Thread Renaud Manus
After more investigation, moving filesystem/local to single-user milestone is not an option when Sun Cluster or Sun Storagetek AVS comes into play. -- Renaud Narendra Kumar S.S wrote: > Jordan, > > Is there any particular reason, why you are not proposing to move > filesystem/local to sin

Re: [zones-discuss] [smf-discuss] Possible solution to automated installation of "single user" patches

2008-09-01 Thread Renaud Manus
ween those services and SMF doesn't allow it. eg. fs/local <- ms/single-user <- system/nws_scm <- fs/local Oups! -- Renaud Narendra Kumar S.S wrote: > Renaud, > > Can you please elaborate on this? > > Regards, > Narendra > > > > On Mon, Sep 1,

Re: [zones-discuss] zoneroot on nfs?

2008-10-21 Thread Renaud Manus
See Jeff's blog for full details: http://blogs.sun.com/JeffV/entry/zoit_solaris_zones_on_iscsi -- Renaud Jason King wrote: > I haven't found any documentation (yet, still looking), that says > anything either way, but I'm wondering to facilitate zone migration if > you can place a zone root on

Re: [zones-discuss] Zones and Shutdown

2008-12-03 Thread Renaud Manus
Vincent Boisard wrote: > Hi everyone, > > what happens if I have zones running and I shutdown the machine with a: > > shutdown -i5 -g0 -y > > Are the zones halted (zoneadm -z zone halt), or a shutdown command is > executed in each running zone? During the shutdown, if system/zones (SMF servi

Re: [zones-discuss] not a valid mount point

2009-04-08 Thread Renaud Manus
. All Rights Reserved. Use is subject to license terms. Assembled 19 November 2008 Renaud Manus wrote: Are you sure this is a os2008.11 system ? Because, the mount point refers to something S10 standard upgrade or live-upgrade would create.

Re: [zones-discuss] not a valid mount point

2009-04-08 Thread Renaud Manus
Are you sure this is a os2008.11 system ? Because, the mount point refers to something S10 standard upgrade or live-upgrade would create... -- Renaud solarg wrote: hello all, my server is os2008.11, and i've the problem described here: http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=90147 i'm

Re: [zones-discuss] Modify pset size

2009-08-25 Thread Renaud Manus
Ketan a écrit : I 'm unable to modify pset size configuration. # poolcfg -c 'modify pset pset-app (uint pset.size = 16 )' poolcfg: put property pset.size failed: Bad parameter supplied I believe you cannot directly changed the size of the pset through the pset.size property. pset.size is ju

Re: [zones-discuss] How to enable a service of a zone that is not running...

2009-09-28 Thread Renaud Manus
It should be possible to do it since the integration of PSARC 2008/015 svccfg refresh subcommand in nevada. eg. # svccfg svc:> repository /etc/svc/repository.db svc:> select svc:> setprop general/enabled = true svc:> refresh svc:> exit I've never tried it though and I'm not sure you can manipu