Hi,
KARTIK VASHISHTA wrote:
> Have any GLD drivers for qfe on sparc been released? I'm looking for
> developments on this. What's the likelihood, that, drivers for
> sparc-opensolaris, will, on, Solaris 10 sparc, work?
>
> Kartik Vashishta
The Nevada (OpenSolaris) qfe drivers are GLDv3 based.
Have any GLD drivers for qfe on sparc been released? I'm looking for
developments on this. What's the likelihood, that, drivers for
sparc-opensolaris, will, on, Solaris 10 sparc, work?
Kartik Vashishta
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
z
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Fredrich Maney wrote:
> Instead of snooping the traffic, why not do it through DTrace? That
> should meet your security requirements nicely.
>
> fpsm
>
Heh! No SUNWCdtrace cluster either. In fact, I may have to sell
"observability" down the river because I see t
Instead of snooping the traffic, why not do it through DTrace? That
should meet your security requirements nicely.
fpsm
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Christine Tran
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am putting 2 applications that talk to each other on two non-global
> zones of type exclusive-ip. I do this
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:36 PM, James Carlson wrote:
> Using the existing Clearview interfaces (integrated back in November
> for build 103; see CR 4085089), you should be able to snoop lo0 just
> fine.
>
Unfortunately this is Solaris 10 8/07, we may be able to go to 10/08
but Nevada is defini
Christine Tran writes:
> I am putting 2 applications that talk to each other on two non-global
> zones of type exclusive-ip. I do this for one reason only, that is to
> be able to observe traffic between the two applications for
> troubleshooting if and when things go wrong. Unfortunately, this w
> Hi,
>
> I am putting 2 applications that talk to each other on two non-global
> zones of type exclusive-ip. I do this for one reason only, that is to
> be able to observe traffic between the two applications for
> troubleshooting if and when things go wrong. Unfortunately, this will
> run afoul
Hi,
I am putting 2 applications that talk to each other on two non-global
zones of type exclusive-ip. I do this for one reason only, that is to
be able to observe traffic between the two applications for
troubleshooting if and when things go wrong. Unfortunately, this will
run afoul of security
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 12:04:02PM +, Caroline Carol wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I configure a local zone as exclusive-ip
> ## zonecfg -z zone1
> .
> ...> set ip-type=exclusive
> ...>add net
> > set physical=ce0
> ...> end
>
>
>
> But when I boot the zone, I don't see any inteface
> ### ifcon
Robert Smicinski writes:
> I don't see that reference in the Sun "What's New Solaris 10 8/07" Release:
>
> http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-0547/6mgbdbsoa?l=en&a=view&q=ip+instances
I don't see a reference to the issue there, either. I think that's
probably a documentation bug.
The issue is
I don't see that reference in the Sun "What's New Solaris 10 8/07" Release:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-0547/6mgbdbsoa?l=en&a=view&q=ip+instances
"IP Instances: LAN and VLAN Separation for Non-Global Zones
IP networking can now be configured in two different ways, depending on whether
t
Robert Smicinski writes:
> We have the same problem, none of our interfaces show up on ce's, bge's,
> qfe's or ge's on sparc.
> It does work on one of our x86 machines though. Maybe it's related to sparc?
It's not SPARC that's the problem. The problem is that the IP
Instances feature ("exclusiv
We have the same problem, none of our interfaces show up on ce's, bge's, qfe's
or ge's on sparc.
It does work on one of our x86 machines though. Maybe it's related to sparc?
>>> caroline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/11/2007 7:23 AM >>>
Hi,
I set up exclusive-ip zone, using theses instructions :
> s
caroline writes:
> When I boot the zone, I don't see physical interface anymore
> zone1# ifconfig -a
> lo0: flags=2001000849 mtu 8232
> index 1
> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff00
>
>
> Is there other configuration to add ?
To use 'ce' with IP Instances, you'll need to have software that
On 11 Dec 2007, at 13:23, caroline wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I set up exclusive-ip zone, using theses instructions :
>
>> set ip-type=excluse
>> add net
>> set physical=ce
>
>
The ce interface currently cannot be used with exclusive ip instances.
Look at the crosbow faq for supported network interfa
Hi,
I set up exclusive-ip zone, using theses instructions :
> set ip-type=excluse
>add net
> set physical=ce
When I boot the zone, I don't see physical interface anymore
zone1# ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=2001000849 mtu 8232
index 1
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff00
Is there other confi
Hi,
I configure a local zone as exclusive-ip
## zonecfg -z zone1
.
...> set ip-type=exclusive
...>add net
> set physical=ce0
...> end
But when I boot the zone, I don't see any inteface
### ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=2001000849 mtu 8232
index 1
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff00
Is
17 matches
Mail list logo
