Re: [zones-discuss] reviews for 6933462 onu should support zones
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 06:56:39PM +, John Levon wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:46:36AM -0800, Edward Pilatowicz wrote: > > > > > > > > > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~johnlev/onu-zones/ > > > > zoneadm list -cip will only list zones in the installed state, but > > That's not true: > > r...@hiss:~# zoneadm list -cip > 0:global:running:/::ipkg:shared > -:ozone:installed:/rpool/zones/ozone:84452639-6108-c6e3-b411-f53b9a16cc9f:ipkg:shared > -:twilight:configured:/rock/zones/twilight::ipkg:shared > > I could make it be zoneadm list -cp if it's an issue for you... > oops. my bad. re-reading of the man page has set me strait. i'm fine with either cip or cp. ed ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] reviews for 6933462 onu should support zones
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:46:36AM -0800, Edward Pilatowicz wrote: > > > > > > > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~johnlev/onu-zones/ > > zoneadm list -cip will only list zones in the installed state, but That's not true: r...@hiss:~# zoneadm list -cip 0:global:running:/::ipkg:shared -:ozone:installed:/rpool/zones/ozone:84452639-6108-c6e3-b411-f53b9a16cc9f:ipkg:shared -:twilight:configured:/rock/zones/twilight::ipkg:shared I could make it be zoneadm list -cp if it's an issue for you... regards john ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] reviews for 6933462 onu should support zones
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 06:10:43PM +, John Levon wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 07:55:21AM -0800, Edward Pilatowicz wrote: > > > > > > > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~johnlev/onu-zones/ > > OK please reload. > zoneadm list -cip will only list zones in the installed state, but update_zone() also check for the configured state. you probably want list -cvp ed ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] reviews for 6933462 onu should support zones
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 07:55:21AM -0800, Edward Pilatowicz wrote: > > > > > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~johnlev/onu-zones/ OK please reload. regards john ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] reviews for 6933462 onu should support zones
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 03:52:31PM +, John Levon wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 07:40:36AM -0800, Edward Pilatowicz wrote: > > > > > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~johnlev/onu-zones/ > > Updated > > > hm. i actually think we'd be ok with just cloning running zones. we > > after all, we don't shut down the global zone to clone it. i guess the > > main thing that you're protecting yourself against by shutting down the > > zone is against there being a pkg(1) process running within the zone at > > the time you clone it. > > Right. I'd kind of presumed that beadm had something similarly safe for > the GZ, but maybe it doesn't. > > I don't mind removing the shutdown if people aren't wild about it. > personally, i'd leave it out. onu is for developers. if developers are running pkg commands in an ngz while running onu at the same time in the gz, well, don't do that. ed ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] reviews for 6933462 onu should support zones
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 07:40:36AM -0800, Edward Pilatowicz wrote: > > > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~johnlev/onu-zones/ Updated > hm. i actually think we'd be ok with just cloning running zones. we > after all, we don't shut down the global zone to clone it. i guess the > main thing that you're protecting yourself against by shutting down the > zone is against there being a pkg(1) process running within the zone at > the time you clone it. Right. I'd kind of presumed that beadm had something similarly safe for the GZ, but maybe it doesn't. I don't mind removing the shutdown if people aren't wild about it. regards john ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] reviews for 6933462 onu should support zones
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 03:13:48AM +, John Levon wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 04:36:41PM -0800, Edward Pilatowicz wrote: > > > > Please can I get people to take a look at: > > > > > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~johnlev/onu-zones/ > > > > i only have one comment. is it really possible to have a zone running > > within an alternate BE? i didn't think it was. > > Hmm. I haven't done the right thing here. What I was really trying to > say was that the zone needs to be shutdown before we clone, but of > course that happens before we iterate through the zones. I need a > two-pass approach... > hm. i actually think we'd be ok with just cloning running zones. we after all, we don't shut down the global zone to clone it. i guess the main thing that you're protecting yourself against by shutting down the zone is against there being a pkg(1) process running within the zone at the time you clone it. ed ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] reviews for 6933462 onu should support zones
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 04:36:41PM -0800, Edward Pilatowicz wrote: > > Please can I get people to take a look at: > > > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~johnlev/onu-zones/ > > i only have one comment. is it really possible to have a zone running > within an alternate BE? i didn't think it was. Hmm. I haven't done the right thing here. What I was really trying to say was that the zone needs to be shutdown before we clone, but of course that happens before we iterate through the zones. I need a two-pass approach... regards john ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] reviews for 6933462 onu should support zones
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 11:12:21PM +, John Levon wrote: > > Please can I get people to take a look at: > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~johnlev/onu-zones/ > i only have one comment. is it really possible to have a zone running within an alternate BE? i didn't think it was. ed ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] reviews for 6933462 onu should support zones
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 04:22:56PM -0800, Liane Praza wrote: > >>http://cr.opensolaris.org/~johnlev/onu-zones/ I updated this for two jbeck comments: a spelling fix for en_US, and to loop waiting for zones that are shutting down. > This looks reasonable to me. Thank you very much for tackling it. As a > sanity check, this probably would stay (modulo changing the messaging) > even once upgrade-on-attach works for systems without entire, right? It > seems like it would be a useful developer convenience? Yes, I expect so. Although it would be nice to be able to use upgrade-on-attach in the new BE, I don't think that's planned. > >the full refresh is needed because we may not have the latest > >catalogs for all the configured publishers. > > > >what i tried to ask was: why don't the other set-publisher > >operations use the --no-refresh option. afaik, by default a > >set-publisher operation will cause us to refresh the cached publisher > >data, which we're going to cache anyway when we do the refresh > >--full. > > Prior to integration, we couldn't require a recent enough version of pkg > to count on this behaviour. I think we do now, and this sounds like > it'd speed things up a little. I filed: 6933504 onu could skip some refresh operations thanks john ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] reviews for 6933462 onu should support zones
On 03/ 9/10 03:53 PM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote: On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 11:12:21PM +, John Levon wrote: Please can I get people to take a look at: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~johnlev/onu-zones/ This looks reasonable to me. Thank you very much for tackling it. As a sanity check, this probably would stay (modulo changing the messaging) even once upgrade-on-attach works for systems without entire, right? It seems like it would be a useful developer convenience? BTW Ed was asking why the full refresh was needed - anyone? that's not entirely true. ;) the full refresh is needed because we may not have the latest catalogs for all the configured publishers. what i tried to ask was: why don't the other set-publisher operations use the --no-refresh option. afaik, by default a set-publisher operation will cause us to refresh the cached publisher data, which we're going to cache anyway when we do the refresh --full. Prior to integration, we couldn't require a recent enough version of pkg to count on this behaviour. I think we do now, and this sounds like it'd speed things up a little. liane ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] reviews for 6933462 onu should support zones
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 11:12:21PM +, John Levon wrote: > > Please can I get people to take a look at: > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~johnlev/onu-zones/ > > BTW Ed was asking why the full refresh was needed - anyone? > that's not entirely true. ;) the full refresh is needed because we may not have the latest catalogs for all the configured publishers. what i tried to ask was: why don't the other set-publisher operations use the --no-refresh option. afaik, by default a set-publisher operation will cause us to refresh the cached publisher data, which we're going to cache anyway when we do the refresh --full. ed ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] reviews for 6933462 onu should support zones
> '...' substitutions won't be in POSIX anymore. That may be, but we would have to absolutely hate our customers to remove support for this construct from our shells, so the positions of POSIX on the matter seem a bit academic. -- meem ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
Re: [zones-discuss] reviews for 6933462 onu should support zones
I would be delighted if onu.sh gets a makefile target which tests the
script with ksh93 -n for errors:
ksh93 -n onu.sh
onu.sh: warning: line 153: `...` obsolete, use $(...)
onu.sh: warning: line 203: `...` obsolete, use $(...)
onu.sh: warning: line 216: `...` obsolete, use $(...)
onu.sh: warning: line 217: `...` obsolete, use $(...)
onu.sh: warning: line 222: `...` obsolete, use $(...)
onu.sh: warning: line 237: `...` obsolete, use $(...)
onu.sh: warning: line 262: `...` obsolete, use $(...)
'...' substitutions won't be in POSIX anymore.
Olga
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:12 AM, John Levon wrote:
>
> Please can I get people to take a look at:
>
> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~johnlev/onu-zones/
>
> BTW Ed was asking why the full refresh was needed - anyone?
>
> thanks
> john
> ___
> zones-discuss mailing list
> zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
>
--
, __ ,
{ \/`o;-Olga Kryzhanovska -;o`\/ }
.'-/`-/ olga.kryzhanov...@gmail.com \-`\-'.
`'-..-| / Solaris/BSD//C/C++ programmer \ |-..-'`
/\/\ /\/\
`--` `--`
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
[zones-discuss] reviews for 6933462 onu should support zones
Please can I get people to take a look at: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~johnlev/onu-zones/ BTW Ed was asking why the full refresh was needed - anyone? thanks john ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
