Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
Hey Patrick,
* ZOOKEEPER-22
* Netty - allow encryption btw servers (potentially clients too)
Yes! Yes! Both server and client, please! As we discussed, we want to
use ZooKeeper as a coordination service within a network which
shouldn't be *entirely* trusted, and
* Netty - allow encryption btw servers (potentially clients too)
Yes! Yes! Both server and client, please! As we discussed, we want to
use ZooKeeper as a coordination service within a network which
shouldn't be *entirely* trusted, and this is a critical feature for
this reason.
I believe
It's that time again, thinking about the next release of ZK. From what
I'm hearing people seem interested in improving client support
(ZOOKEEPER-22 missed 3.3) and reducing some technical debt.
In particular I believe we should look at the following going forward.
Of course ZooKeeper is open
Hey Patrick,
* ZOOKEEPER-22
* Netty - allow encryption btw servers (potentially clients too)
Yes! Yes! Both server and client, please! As we discussed, we want to
use ZooKeeper as a coordination service within a network which
shouldn't be *entirely* trusted, and this is a critical feature for
