Hi,
I have a doubt...
I would like to know if all the fixes included in Zope 2.7.7 (that was out
after 2.8.0) will be included in 2.8.1, like for example :
* Collector #1781: made create_mount_points ZConfig option actually work
(thanks to Dieter Maurer for the patch).
* Collector #1797: when a
Ok thanks...
Pascal
-Message d'origine-
De : Andreas Jung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : jeudi 28 juillet 2005 09:33
À : Pascal Peregrina; 'zope@zope.org'
Objet : Re: [Zope] About Zope 2.8.1
--On 28. Juli 2005 08:29:11 +0100 Pascal Peregrina
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I
Hi!
How can I split a Zodb? I mean, I have a big folder which I would like
to became a separate ZODB file to mount on the main one. In unix I would
move all the files of that folder on another partition, then mount it on
that folder.
___
Zope
Good day everyone
I've defined some archetypes that contain fields like Title_en, Title_de, Content_en, Content_de, etc.
Assuming that I've set a language var related to URL like (lang = 'en'), how can i access them?
Thanks,
Cristi
___
Zope maillist
Hi Christian,
Thanks for this long and balanced post.
Far less heated than I (or other hot people of the community) can produce.
I hope ZC will take time to answer your legitimate questions...
I suppose you'll await some progress on the negotiation before joining
us in ZEA...
BTW, do you
--On 28. Juli 2005 11:59:09 +0300 Cristi Barladeanu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Good day everyone
I've defined some archetypes that contain fields like Title_en, Title_de,
Content_en, Content_de, etc.
Assuming that I've set a language var related to URL like (lang = 'en'),
how can i access
I would like to be able to parse a very basic DTML string (a
ZSQLMethod on the file system actually) outside Zope, ie. without
having the whole zserver running.
The DTML inside the string is very basic. It doesn't use REQUEST or
aqcuisition. It's using dtml-if 1==2 and stuff.
I've tried looking on
Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 7/28/05, Yuri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
How can I split a Zodb? I mean, I have a big folder which I would like
to became a separate ZODB file
Well, I suspect the simplest way is to copy the ZODB and delete
everything that shouldn't be in it. Export and
On 7/28/05, Yuri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, some command line tools could help... zodb operations can take
longer time (for example, changing the name of the upper folder wake up
all the contained objects...)
Yeah, but it wouldn't be faster through the command line...
--
Lennart
- Original Message -
From: Peter Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: zope@zope.org
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 5:59 AM
Subject: [Zope] DTML parsing outside of Zope
I would like to be able to parse a very basic DTML string (a
ZSQLMethod on the file system actually) outside Zope, ie.
import Zope
app=Zope.app()
No. I've actually found a way to do it without starting zope (thus,
not using the ZODB).
The trick was in import nvSQL from DA.py and use that. It works now, I
can now parse and run ZSQL methods on the filesystem without having
any zope running.
I'm going to tidy my
Good day all,
Using Zope 2.7.6 I'm trying to use the getPhysicalRoot() function.
In a rather large site we have a folder called 'functions' placed in root. This
folder contains a formatting function 'far' I want to use in some other folder.
But in the path from root to the place I the function
--On 28. Juli 2005 13:24:37 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good day all,
Using Zope 2.7.6 I'm trying to use the getPhysicalRoot() function.
In a rather large site we have a folder called 'functions' placed in
root. This folder contains a formatting function 'far' I want to use in
some
But how do I get the connection id ?
Actually I get it when I instance the product in Zope.
What I think is something like
class Foo
def __init__ (self, conn):
self.conn = conn
myquery = SQL ('doMyQuery', '', self.conn, '', 'select * from table')
but obviously it will not work.
TIA,
ngw
Hi,
I would like to know
what if using taskset (CPU affinity utility on linux) to bind each Zope instance
to one single CPU can improve overall performance of both instances in any way
?
As far a I know,
python can not fully take advantage of 2 CPU cause python threads are not OS
Tim Peters wrote:
It's starting to look a lot like the Windows bind() implementation is
unreliable, sometimes (but rarely -- hard to provoke) allowing two
sockets to bind to the same (address, port) pair simultaneously,
instead of raising 'Address already in use' for one of them. Disaster
Tim Peters wrote:
[Sune B. Woeller]
I will try to recreate the problem on other
flavours of windows asap. I will get back to you
later.
Cool! If you can, posting a self-contained program that demonstrates
the problem is the best way to make progress.
I guess my reporting was a bit too
--On 28. Juli 2005 14:11:18 +0100 Pascal Peregrina
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know what if using taskset (CPU affinity utility on linux)
to bind each Zope instance to one single CPU can improve overall
performance of both instances in any way ?
A single Python CPU can
Run as many Zope instances as CPUs you
have if you wish to take advantage of this in Zope: i.e. 2 CPUs == 2 Zope
Instances.
You will basically double the performance
of the server with ea. CPU/Instance. At some point there might be a
diminishing return, but I doubt any of us have that
I have made two similar testprograms in c++, and the problem also occurs there.
Exactly the same pattern as my python client/server scripts in the mail I am
replying to.
But then I stumbled upon this flag in the WinSock documentation:
SO_EXCLUSIVEADDRUSE
See the description here:
btw, the code is slightly modified versions of the getting started with Winsock
example:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/winsock/winsock/getting_started_with_winsock.asp
Sune B. Woeller wrote:
I have made two similar testprograms in c++, and the problem also
--On 28. Juli 2005 14:59:15 -0400 Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can Zope use it for its database? And if so what do I use?
- DCOracle2
-aj
pgpMWV1In7wW0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
Solved.
Thanks for the reactions. It works! My current code looks like this now:
#force function in '/root/functions'
far = context.restrictedTraverse('/').functions.far
x = foo()
print far(value=x)
Of course, it is stupid to make getPhysicalRoot private
when it is so easy to access the
Hi!
Thanks for this long and balanced post.
Far less heated than I (or other hot people of the community) can produce.
I hope ZC will take time to answer your legitimate questions...
I'd also prefer some answers by some independant people regarding legal
topics (as long as it can be told
Robert-Reinder Nederhoed wrote:
Solved.
Thanks for the reactions. It works! My current code looks like this now:
#force function in '/root/functions'
far = context.restrictedTraverse('/').functions.far
x = foo()
print far(value=x)
Of course, it is stupid to make getPhysicalRoot private
[Sune B. Woeller]
...
This is what I'm experiencing as well.
I can narrow it down a bit: I *always* experience one out of two
erroneous behaviours, as described below.
I see only one of the behaviors below (the second -- no problems), and
don't agree it's in error.
I tried to make an even
Hi All,
I have a ZCatalog with two text indexes, news_subj and news_text. Each
ZCatalog item also has a unique numeric ID.
I'd like to search news_subj and news_text simultaneously, with the
results checked for duplicates. In other words, if catalog item 1001 has
the word foobar in both the
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 03:57:45PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I have a ZCatalog with two text indexes, news_subj and news_text. Each
ZCatalog item also has a unique numeric ID.
I'd like to search news_subj and news_text simultaneously, with the
results checked for duplicates.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: zope@zope.org
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 4:57 PM
Subject: [Zope] Suppressing dupes in a concatenated ZCatalog query.
Hi All,
I have a ZCatalog with two text indexes, news_subj and news_text. Each
ZCatalog item also has a unique
[Sune B. Woeller]
...
But then I stumbled upon this flag in the WinSock documentation:
SO_EXCLUSIVEADDRUSE
See the description here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/winsock/winsock/using_so_exclusiveaddruse.asp
Right, I vaguely wink knew about that. Note that
[Tim]
...
At this point, I wouldn't consider using it [SO_EXCLUSIVEADDRUSE]
unless someone first took the tedious time it needs to demonstrate that
when it is used, the thing that _I_ think is a bug here goes away in its
presence: the seeming ability of Windows to sometimes permit more
than
Please file a bug report to make getPhysicalPath() publilc. I agree with
Dieter that it is dumb to make it private if you can get the root using
restrictedTraverse()).
-aj
--On 28. Juli 2005 22:22:42 +0200 Robert-Reinder Nederhoed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Solved.
Thanks for the
Hi I have zope-2.7.2 installed but I can't seem to log into zope with
the emergency user. I followed the instruction:
cd /usr/lib/zope
bin/zpasswd.py access
Username: superuser
Password:
Verify password:
Please choose a format from:
SHA - SHA-1 hashed password (default)
CRYPT - UNIX-style crypt
--On 28. Juli 2005 20:36:28 -0700 ed nospam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi I have zope-2.7.2 installed but I can't seem to log into zope with
the emergency user. I followed the instruction:
cd /usr/lib/zope
Are you sure you that /usr/lib/zope is your instance home and *not* your
software
Andreas,
You are awesome. :) It fixed the problem. Yeah, it should have been
/var/lib/zope. Thank you! Thank you! :) You just beat all the google
search I've done in the past hour. :)
On 7/28/05, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On 28. Juli 2005 20:36:28 -0700 ed nospam [EMAIL
35 matches
Mail list logo
