Log message for revision 110619:
Coverage for App.ApplicationManager.DebugManager.
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/src/App/tests/test_ApplicationManager.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/src/App/tests/test_ApplicationManager.py
===
---
Log message for revision 110620:
Coverage for App.ApplicationManager.ApplicationManager.
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/src/App/ApplicationManager.py
U Zope/trunk/src/App/tests/test_ApplicationManager.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/src/App/ApplicationManager.py
Log message for revision 110621:
Ignore derived.
Changed:
A Zope/trunk/.bzrignore
-=-
Added: Zope/trunk/.bzrignore
===
--- Zope/trunk/.bzrignore (rev 0)
+++ Zope/trunk/.bzrignore 2010-04-08
Log message for revision 110622:
Coverage for App.ApplicationManager.AltDatabaseManager.
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/src/App/tests/test_ApplicationManager.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/src/App/tests/test_ApplicationManager.py
===
---
Log message for revision 110623:
More coverage for App.ApplicationManager.ApplicationManager.
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/src/App/tests/test_ApplicationManager.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/src/App/tests/test_ApplicationManager.py
===
Log message for revision 110625:
PEP 8.
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/src/App/ApplicationManager.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/src/App/ApplicationManager.py
===
--- Zope/trunk/src/App/ApplicationManager.py2010-04-08 01:21:38 UTC
Log message for revision 110626:
Whitespace for clarity.
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/src/App/tests/test_ApplicationManager.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/src/App/tests/test_ApplicationManager.py
===
---
I am wondering why the z3c.form radio widget appends :list to the names
of the generated input elements. Since a radio list can never have more
than one option selected I can't see any reason to do that. Does anyone
know this is done?
Wichert.
___
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Tue Apr 6 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Wed Apr 7 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 7 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 1 from ct at gocept.com.
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED: Repository policy check found errors in 707 projects
From: ct at
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
So this is still in pyexpat C code as far as I can tell. :-(
This is saddening.
I've not managed a 64-bit sandbox, which I suspect is what I really
need to debug that. Will shoot for this weekend, since last didn't
Le mardi 6 avril 2010 18:54:24, Jim Fulton a écrit :
Is there a document you can point to that provide a description of the
approach used?
A document is in the works, in the while I'll try to describe the architecture
briefly (should be readable to people knowing a bit about TPC) and give some
Fred Drake wrote:
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Martin Aspelioptilude+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
So this is still in pyexpat C code as far as I can tell. :-(
This is saddening.
But on the other hand, your dedication in helping me find a fix is
heartening. ;)
I've not managed a 64-bit
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Vincent Pelletier vinc...@nexedi.com wrote:
Le mardi 6 avril 2010 18:54:24, Jim Fulton a écrit :
Is there a document you can point to that provide a description of the
approach used?
A document is in the works, in the while I'll try to describe the architecture
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a slight suspicion that lxml is involved somewhere. I've managed
to make it crash reliably simply by doing a parse of an XML file, and I
think such a parse may be happening as a side effect of a module import
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Hi,
looks like SVN and viewcvs weren't responding for a couple minutes. I
could log into the machine via SSH and Apache serving docs.zope.org
still worked.
I only noticed:
27059 simon 20 0 98664 6388 4360 R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/7/10 17:08 , Tres Seaver wrote:
I'm seeing frequent periods of 50+% packet loss to the machine, and
can't even get top to run on it this morning. Any clues about what is
causing the load?
I haven't watched it because I don't know when
On 4/7/10 17:14 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/7/10 17:08 , Tres Seaver wrote:
I'm seeing frequent periods of 50+% packet loss to the machine, and
can't even get top to run on it this morning. Any clues about what is
causing the load?
I
On 4/7/10 17:17 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 4/7/10 17:14 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/7/10 17:08 , Tres Seaver wrote:
I'm seeing frequent periods of 50+% packet loss to the machine, and
can't even get top to run on it this morning. Any clues
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Hi,
looks like SVN and viewcvs weren't responding for a couple minutes. I
could log into the machine via SSH and Apache serving docs.zope.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/7/10 17:27 , Jim Fulton wrote:
We've been having some networking issues over the last week or two that
we believe to have been addressed.
I'm still getting alerts from Nagios 2-3 times a day caused by high
packet loss and inability to connect
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I woul like for the checkouts made to test repository policy should use
the '--ignore-externals' flag, because the code brought in as externals
is either checked separately, or else corresponds to a (non-checked) tag.
Tres.
- --
On 04/07/2010 05:44 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I woul like for the checkouts made to test repository policy should use
the '--ignore-externals' flag, because the code brought in as externals
is either checked separately, or else corresponds to a
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/7/10 17:27 , Jim Fulton wrote:
We've been having some networking issues over the last week or two that
we believe to have been addressed.
I'm still getting alerts
On Apr 7, 2010, at 1:33 PM, David Glick wrote:
I also need to make some updates to make zc.authorizedotnet work with
Python 2.6, as it currently depends (via zc.ssl) on ssl-for-setuptools, which
is a backport of the ssl module that ships with Python 2.6.
You will not need to make those
On Apr 7, 2010, at 2:35 PM, David Glick wrote:
Understood. Now that Plone 4 is almost ready and using Python 2.6,
there are a number of Plone GetPaid users who are ready to use these
changes as soon as they're released. :)
zc.ssl-1.2 and zc.authorizedotnet-1.3.1 have been tagged and released
environment variable support for zc.buildout, including extends!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zc.buildout/+bug/557769
works for me so far
--
Florian Friesdorf f...@chaoflow.net
GPG FPR: EA5C F2B4 FBBB BA65 3DCD E8ED 82A1 6522 4A1F 4367
Jabber/XMPP: f...@chaoflow.net
OTR FPR: 9E191746
Hi!
I have a problem with my instances of Zope 2.8.4: recently they started
to run slowly. Restarting doesn't help much.
After observing Zope threads with DeadlockDebugger we found that very
often threads are stuck while trying to access to ZEO cache file.
We have ZEO server and 2 ZEO clients.
Hi,
I'm currently working on a project which will hopefully have no TTW code
so I was hoping to be do without skins - currently I have a my skin on top
of CMFDefault but it is just main_template and some CSS. If I drop the CMF
skins entirely I hit some problems as quite a few forms exist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/7/10 13:09 , Charlie Clark wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently working on a project which will hopefully have no TTW code
so I was hoping to be do without skins - currently I have a my skin on top
of CMFDefault but it is just main_template and
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
Period Tue Apr 6 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Wed Apr 7 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from CMF Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: CMF Tests
Date: Tue Apr 6 21:45:31 EDT 2010
URL:
Am 07.04.2010, 13:47 Uhr, schrieb Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org:
I think I would change the cookie crumbler to expect both: Either a page
with an ID that the cookie crumbler can traverse to (which is what it
does right now), or an ID for a view that you could traverse to using
the @@
Hi!
Charlie Clark wrote:
I'm currently working on a project which will hopefully have no TTW code
so I was hoping to be do without skins - currently I have a my skin on top
of CMFDefault but it is just main_template and some CSS. If I drop the CMF
skins entirely I hit some problems as quite
Am 07.04.2010, 14:27 Uhr, schrieb yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de:
I have a LoginFormView and a MailPasswordFormView in my private
repository. They allow to insert the email address instead of the member
id. The views look up the first user that matches the email address.
No changes required
Hi!
Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 07.04.2010, 14:27 Uhr, schrieb yuppiey.2...@wcm-solutions.de:
I have a LoginFormView and a MailPasswordFormView in my private
repository. They allow to insert the email address instead of the member
id. The views look up the first user that matches the email
34 matches
Mail list logo
