On Tuesday 27 November 2007, Nathan Yergler wrote:
So unfortunately it's going to require some more work to fix up the
loader; I'll probably create a branch to work on this some...
Great! Let me know if you have questions. I have once updated the XML
definitions and it was not too bad. It's
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
btw, I think since we use buildout, it's not possible to
implement mixed Zope3/Five packages bacause setup has to
define the Five packages too. right?
In general, it makes the reuse of a package difficult if it depends on
Zope 2 stuff (incl. Five).
As
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Wed Nov 28 13:00:00 2007 UTC to Thu Nov 29 13:00:00 2007 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Wed Nov 28 20:53:07 EST 2007
Sorry, I dont have the summary stuff automated...
Begin forwarded message:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cron Daemon)
Date: November 29, 2007 1:02:48 AM EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cron [EMAIL PROTECTED] $HOME/bin/releasechecker.py
Products.GenericSetup
OK (1 dependencies)
Tres Seaver wrote:
Please separate out the dependency problem from NIH: in this case,
zope.i18n predates the NIH package by *years* (the i18n support was the
topic of the *first* extra-mural Zope3 sprint, in January of 2002).
Actually no, if I understand Philipp's comment correctly, the NIH
Tres Seaver, on 2007-11-29:
One of the overrides in the CMF catalog tool (and inherited in the Plone
version, AFAIK) is filtering out content which the user wouldn't be
permitted to view if she did find it. Are you sure that your School
object is in an appropriate workflow state for the user
Hey,
On Nov 28, 2007 11:18 PM, Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hey,
On Nov 28, 2007 12:16 AM, Martijn Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We could also consider putting them in some kind
of collective-like SVN repository so that people can
make changes when
Hey,
On Nov 29, 2007 12:53 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
[snip]
For clarity, nobody but a ZC employee (at present) is supposed to be
checking in any code with any license other than the ZPL; in the
future, such a checkin will need to be approved
Hello,
Thanks very much for your feedback!
I'm cc-ing this discussion to grok-dev, as I want to make sure that
Grok developers see this. Future discussion
should continue on grok-dev, I think, as this is all pretty grok
specific by now.
On Nov 29, 2007 2:29 AM, Rene B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Martijin.
Zope 2.10.4-final,
python 2.4.4,
win32,
mysql 5.0,
ZMySQLDA 2.0.9
kamal
iginal Message -
From: Martijn Jacobs
To: kamal hamzat
Cc: zope@zope.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 4:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope] AssertionError
Can you provide some more
Martijn Faassen wrote:
the work of collecting interesting Zope 2 products, contacting the
authors (not strictly necessary but always a good thing to do) and
checking them in, possibly
cleaning things up here and there.
Well, I think is is fine for products where the original maintainer has
I'm not quite sure what you mean by a selection button but as far as a
checkbox the value will exist or not. that is to say that if the box is
checked then the value and variable will exist. if the box is not checked
then there is nothing. At least this is what I have found with forms and
Hi,
Am I doing anything wrong or filter parameter of browser:menuItem is
just ignored?
I have that problem in Plone but I suspect CMF ActionsTool if not Five
itself.
browser:menuItem
for=Products.Archetypes.interfaces.IBaseObject
menu=object
title=synchronize
13 matches
Mail list logo
