Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
>> btw, I think since we use buildout, it's not possible to
>> implement mixed Zope3/Five packages bacause setup has to
>> define the Five packages too. right?
> In general, it makes the reuse of a package difficult if it depends on
> Zope 2 stuff (incl. Five).
As Malthe explains, the implementation does not depend on Five, the
tests do. Is he supposed to put the Five dependent tests into a
different package? I think there's little to gain from that, and the
added burden of having two packages.
And, I don't see why patching a base class that both Zope 3 and Zope 2
share is a "magic dependency".
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -