Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: >> btw, I think since we use buildout, it's not possible to >> implement mixed Zope3/Five packages bacause setup has to >> define the Five packages too. right? > > In general, it makes the reuse of a package difficult if it depends on > Zope 2 stuff (incl. Five).
As Malthe explains, the implementation does not depend on Five, the tests do. Is he supposed to put the Five dependent tests into a different package? I think there's little to gain from that, and the added burden of having two packages. And, I don't see why patching a base class that both Zope 3 and Zope 2 share is a "magic dependency". Daniel _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
