Tres Seaver wrote:
Please separate out the dependency problem from NIH: in this case,
zope.i18n predates the NIH package by *years* (the i18n support was the
topic of the *first* extra-mural Zope3 sprint, in January of 2002).
Actually no, if I understand Philipp's comment correctly, the NIH
problem *they* suffered from was because of the dependency problem that
zope.i18n suffered from.
Given they have a solution without the dependency problems, maybe we
should use it?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
