On 10/6/06, Pascal Peregrina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+ 100 concurrent threads looks a little heavy
Or more to the point, you need to test with 1, 5, 10, 20 and 50 as
well and look at performance effects of that. Just hitting it with a
100 and assuming that's useful and valid data doesn't wor
Chris Withers schrieb:
ouch... I'd imagine Zope is vulnerable to this?
What source version(s) of python have these problems fixed?
Well debian also had it already. I'd guess current sources
should have it too. Watch changes.txt and friends.
Regards
Tino
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Withers wrote:
> ouch... I'd imagine Zope is vulnerable to this?
>
> What source version(s) of python have these problems fixed?
I think the issue only surfaces if you compile Python for UCS4, which
the desktop-centric versions shipped by the d
ouch... I'd imagine Zope is vulnerable to this?
What source version(s) of python have these problems fixed?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
--- Begin Message ---
On 10/6/06, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Federico Schwindt wrote:
>> What do you mean by "wsgi enabled"? How does wsgi+ differ from wsgi?
>
> The wsgi directive was enabled in 2.10.0b2.
Okay, but what does this actually do?
use a different web server.
[..]
>> The speed drop in
My email address has changed as there have been issues with sending from Gmail not due to any covert operation or attempt to get round any silly blacklists you've set up. I'm frankly relieved that you've done this as I don't particularly find both your inputs helpful or useful. There are many other
Andreas Jung wrote:
Be aware: he changes his email address.
Probably gets banned by the various free providers he abuses ;-)
That's why he escaped from
my blacklist.
probably filtering on "milne" in the To field will be enough...
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python C
--On 6. Oktober 2006 11:33:43 +0100 Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
michaelntmilne wrote:
And anyway a bit of sport is enjoyable...:-)
So is a bit of procmail magic, goodbye michael ;-)
Be aware: he changes his email address. That's why he escaped from
my blacklist.
-aj
pgp
Ok, so far, list feedback is:
+ WSGI test looks wrong
+ 100 concurrent threads looks a little heavy
+ results are not the same as Tres' ones
So, as soon as possible, we will try to make some more tests and will let
you know when the wiki page is updated.
Thanks a lot for the feedback so far.
Pas
Martijn Faassen wrote:
The speed drop in ZPT I think is due to using Zope 3's ZPT engine in
2.10. Zope 3 has, unless someone tells me otherwise, the policy of being
"slow but right" at the moment. Optimisation may be something the Zope 3
guys want to focus on once they've finished refactoring eve
michaelntmilne wrote:
And anyway a bit of sport is enjoyable...:-)
So is a bit of procmail magic, goodbye michael ;-)
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Zope maillist -
Pascal Peregrina wrote:
Of course, for stuff like starting some processing at a given time in the
Zope instance, crontab can be great...
Cron firing off Stepper jobs at a ZEO storage server has worked well for
me in quite a few projects :-)
Well, there is also this interesting
on-going thre
Federico Schwindt wrote:
What do you mean by "wsgi enabled"? How does wsgi+ differ from wsgi?
The wsgi directive was enabled in 2.10.0b2.
Okay, but what does this actually do?
Re wsgi+, do you mean in
the graphic? I need to correct that as the text was truncated. It
should be wsgi+SpeedPa
Surprising indeed.
Why then the static content is so much slower is again weird. It almost
looks like there's a fixed speed for WSGI. Someone who knows more about
how the WSGI support may be able to say more...
WSGI in itself should not make a difference there. However, if the
WSGI server used
14 matches
Mail list logo
