Log message for revision 96736:
another approach for generating the console scripts through entry points
Changed:
A Zope/branches/console-scripts/
-=-
___
Zope-Checkins maillist - Zope-Checkins@zope.org
Log message for revision 96738:
added zpasswd
Changed:
U Zope/branches/console-scripts/setup.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/console-scripts/setup.py
===
--- Zope/branches/console-scripts/setup.py 2009-02-19 12:46:00
Log message for revision 96739:
ZODB3 a11 is out
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/versions-zope2.cfg
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/versions-zope2.cfg
===
--- Zope/trunk/versions-zope2.cfg 2009-02-19 12:48:35 UTC (rev 96738)
+++
Log message for revision 96740:
moved utilities to Zope2
Changed:
A Zope/branches/console-scripts/src/Zope2/utilities/
D Zope/branches/console-scripts/src/utilities/
-=-
___
Zope-Checkins maillist - Zope-Checkins@zope.org
Log message for revision 96741:
checkpoint for further testing
Changed:
U Zope/branches/console-scripts/setup.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/console-scripts/setup.py
===
--- Zope/branches/console-scripts/setup.py
Log message for revision 96743:
fixed detection of zopeskelsrc
Changed:
U Zope/branches/console-scripts/src/Zope2/utilities/mkzopeinstance.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/console-scripts/src/Zope2/utilities/mkzopeinstance.py
Log message for revision 96744:
added for testing (from Repoze)
Changed:
A Zope/branches/console-scripts/src/Zope2/utilities/instance.py
-=-
Added: Zope/branches/console-scripts/src/Zope2/utilities/instance.py
===
---
Log message for revision 96745:
moved zopeskel to Zope2.utitilites
Changed:
D Zope/branches/console-scripts/skel/
U Zope/branches/console-scripts/src/Zope2/utilities/mkzopeinstance.py
A Zope/branches/console-scripts/src/Zope2/utilities/skel/
-=-
Modified:
Log message for revision 96747:
omit data_files
Changed:
U Zope/branches/console-scripts/setup.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/console-scripts/setup.py
===
--- Zope/branches/console-scripts/setup.py 2009-02-19 13:27:55
Log message for revision 96748:
remove data_files
Changed:
U Zope/branches/console-scripts/setup.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/branches/console-scripts/setup.py
===
--- Zope/branches/console-scripts/setup.py 2009-02-19
Log message for revision 96749:
auto-detect path to Zope2-egg
Changed:
U Zope/branches/console-scripts/src/Zope2/utilities/skel/bin/runzope.in
U Zope/branches/console-scripts/src/Zope2/utilities/skel/bin/zopectl.in
-=-
Modified:
Log message for revision 96755:
We don't use the omelette right now, remove!
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/buildout.cfg
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/buildout.cfg
===
--- Zope/trunk/buildout.cfg 2009-02-19 14:55:48 UTC (rev 96754)
Log message for revision 96756:
Removed the bin folder, as we don't use the create_lib_python script. Beware
SVN will annoy you!
Changed:
D Zope/trunk/bin/
U Zope/trunk/buildout.cfg
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/buildout.cfg
Log message for revision 96757:
re-removed repoze' instance.py
Changed:
D Zope/trunk/src/Zope2/utilities/instance.py
-=-
Deleted: Zope/trunk/src/Zope2/utilities/instance.py
===
--- Zope/trunk/src/Zope2/utilities/instance.py
Log message for revision 96759:
No need for lib in svn either
Changed:
D Zope/trunk/lib/
-=-
___
Zope-Checkins maillist - Zope-Checkins@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-checkins
Log message for revision 96760:
No need for top-level utilities anymore, they are inside the Zope2 package
now
Changed:
D Zope/trunk/utilities/
-=-
___
Zope-Checkins maillist - Zope-Checkins@zope.org
Log message for revision 96762:
Externals for C headers stink
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/doc/INSTALL.txt
_U Zope/trunk/include/
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/doc/INSTALL.txt
===
--- Zope/trunk/doc/INSTALL.txt 2009-02-19 15:19:46
Log message for revision 96763:
ZODB 3.9.0a11
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.txt
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.txt
===
--- Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.txt 2009-02-19 15:35:49 UTC (rev 96762)
+++
Log message for revision 96766:
added mkzeoinstance
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/setup.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/setup.py
===
--- Zope/trunk/setup.py 2009-02-19 15:54:53 UTC (rev 96765)
+++ Zope/trunk/setup.py 2009-02-19
Log message for revision 96767:
added a main() function in order to provide a proper
entry point
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/src/Zope2/utilities/mkzeoinstance.py
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/src/Zope2/utilities/mkzeoinstance.py
===
Log message for revision 96791:
Added a couple of known issues
Changed:
U Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.txt
-=-
Modified: Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.txt
===
--- Zope/trunk/doc/CHANGES.txt 2009-02-19 17:48:37 UTC (rev 96790)
+++
Hello,
On http://svn.zope.org/zc.selenium/branches/wosc-zope2/
I've worked to make zc.selenium be usable in Zope2/Five.
There are two big changes, apart from having to sprinkle some
try/except imports and other small compatibility bits around:
1. Since Zope2 insists quite firmly on running in
Hi,
while gathering, cleaning and consolidating the various statements that
float around about the coding style for Zope 3, I found a couple of
issues that I'd like to get clarification for.
What I found is currently gathered at
Previously Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
while gathering, cleaning and consolidating the various statements that
float around about the coding style for Zope 3, I found a couple of
issues that I'd like to get clarification for.
What I found is currently gathered at
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Wed Feb 18 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Feb 19 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests.
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.5.4 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Wed Feb 18
On Feb 19, 2009, at 2:07 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
I have the impression that you're talking past each other.
There are two ways of using OpenID:
* you can be an OpenID provider, i.e. accept logins with username
password and respond to authentication requests from other websites
On Feb 19, 2009, at 5:13 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Christian Theune wrote:
Which attribute naming is current?
==
Do we use under_scores or mixedCaseNames?
I think I remember that we decided to follow PEP 8 for new code and
invoke the local
On Thursday 19 February 2009, Christian Theune wrote:
Which attribute naming is current?
==
Do we use under_scores or mixedCaseNames?
I think I remember that we decided to follow PEP 8 for new code and
invoke the local consistentency rule on old code. Is that
On Thursday 19 February 2009, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
and the decision that was apparently adopted is in this document
(section titled Coding style):
http://svn.zope.org/*checkout*/Sandbox/philikon/foundation/maintaining-soft
ware.txt
Except that not all people agreed to that, including me.
Which attribute naming is current?
==
Do we use under_scores or mixedCaseNames?
I think I remember that we decided to follow PEP 8 for new code and
invoke the local consistentency rule on old code. Is that correct?
According to this document in Zope3
On Feb 19, 2009, at 4:47 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
while gathering, cleaning and consolidating the various statements
that
float around about the coding style for Zope 3, I found a couple of
issues that I'd like to get clarification for.
What I found is currently gathered at
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
BTW, I strongly discourage from imports. (I didn't always have this
opinion, but have seen the error of my ways. Thanks to Fred Drake for
nudging me in this direction.) IMO, this is wildly more important than
any of the issues
On Feb 19, 2009, at 11:03 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
I sort my imports. Period. This makes from imports come before
regular imports (because f comes before i). I discourage from
imports, so this isn't much of an issue for me except for old code.
Having imports sorted takes very little effort and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
On Feb 19, 2009, at 11:03 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
I sort my imports. Period. This makes from imports come before
regular imports (because f comes before i). I discourage from
imports, so this isn't much of an issue for me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
because of the failure of the new.zope.org project I would like to put
the hat on for reorganizing the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org. The
goal is having up some pages with the downloads, basic pointers and
links with the final release of
On Feb 19, 2009, at 12:43 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
Exactly . As I mentioned in the previous post, sorting is the *key*
here. [Pun intended].
Grouping (python, zope., myapp. modules order), or non-grouping,
becomes a non-issue when imports are sorted.
+1
- -1. I prefer the PEP8 grouping,
Andreas Jung wrote:
because of the failure of the new.zope.org project I would like to put
the hat on for reorganizing the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org.
Is this failure official or is there just no action on this?
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19.02.2009 19:16 Uhr, Chris Withers wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
because of the failure of the new.zope.org project I would like to put
the hat on for reorganizing the Zope 2 presentation on zope.org.
Is this failure official or is there just
On Feb 19, 2009, at 12:43 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
- -1. I prefer the PEP8 grouping, where stdlib imports are
separated
from dependecy imports, which are separated from local imports.
Note that this is *not* subjective (an import is unambiguously in
exaclty one of those three
I'm with Tres on both issues: +1 for PEP-8 import grouping (sorted
alphabetically within each group), -1 for repeating
english.adjective.fully english.adverb.qualified english.noun.package
english.noun.names all over the place in the code (this also ties
with my preference of trying to keep all my
Hey Andreas.. yay, thank you for taking this on. I'd like to help
however I can.
You asked about write access on wiki.zope.org - assuming you mean zope
manager access, I've added an account for you, see private mail. (For
the record, other manager accounts on wiki.zope.org at this time are:
Fred Drake wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
BTW, I strongly discourage from imports. (I didn't always have this
opinion, but have seen the error of my ways. Thanks to Fred Drake for
nudging me in this direction.) IMO, this is wildly more important than
Andreas Jung wrote:
See this thread:
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-web/2009-January/thread.html
Shame, oh well, I think dictatorship is the way to go and I think you'd
make a pretty good dictator, so go for it :-)
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
There will be a Zope + Friends sprint @ PyCon 2009, to work on Zope
and Zope-related technologies like Grok, Repoze, Deliverence etc.
http://us.pycon.org/2009/sprints/projects/zope/
Because of the Repoze overlap with WSGI based frameworks we plan to
work closely together with the
There will be a Zope + Friends sprint @ PyCon 2009, to work on Zope
and Zope-related technologies like Grok, Repoze, Deliverence etc.
http://us.pycon.org/2009/sprints/projects/zope/
Because of the Repoze overlap with WSGI based frameworks we plan to
work closely together with the
45 matches
Mail list logo
