William Heymann schrieb:
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 12:47, Chris McDonough wrote:
I'd just record the data from Verisign in response to their POST (do
nothing else) and come along later with a separate request to pick
through the data to do postprocessing on it every so often; then the
data
William Heymann schrieb:
On Wednesday 21 June 2006 01:17, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
William Heymann schrieb:
That is probably a good idea for long term to change things that way and
I would like to rewrite it. However right now I don't really want to
rewrite the way the current system works.
I am dealing with a zope system where Verisign is sending a POST to our server
for ecommerece purposes. Currently I am writing the entire contents of the
POST from verisign to the ZODB however I have a problem that some of these
POSTs are not being recorded because an error occurs later in the
On Jun 20, 2006, at 2:27 PM, William Heymann wrote:
I am dealing with a zope system where Verisign is sending a POST to
our server
for ecommerece purposes. Currently I am writing the entire contents
of the
POST from verisign to the ZODB however I have a problem that some
of these
POSTs
On Tuesday 20 June 2006 12:47, Chris McDonough wrote:
I'd just record the data from Verisign in response to their POST (do
nothing else) and come along later with a separate request to pick
through the data to do postprocessing on it every so often; then the
data always gets recorded and you
On Jun 20, 2006, at 2:55 PM, William Heymann wrote:
That is probably a good idea for long term to change things that
way and I
would like to rewrite it. However right now I don't really want to
rewrite
the way the current system works. I had hoped I could just use
get_transaction().commit()
