The following supporters have open issues assigned to them in this collector
(http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF).
Assigned and Open
efge
- CMFSetup: provide non-ascii im- and exports,
[Accepted] http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/292
jens
- Discussion replies removal,
Hi All,
Asking here 'cos I'm sure I saw someone talking about this recently.
I'm unit testing something which does some logging. It's supposed to
log, so ideally I'd like to test for that, but I'd also like to not have
the log spew showing during tests runs, which seems to have started
Alec Mitchell wrote:
to start using it immediately or risk strange breakages. Maintaining
product compatibility between versions of CMF/Plone will become nearly
impossible.
I'm sorry, I really couldn't resist this...
And that differs from other Plone releases how exactly? ;-)
Chris
--
yuppie wrote:
Or would be 'GenericSetup.content' enough?
Yes, that looks nicer to me :-)
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
Chris Withers wrote:
Alec Mitchell wrote:
to start using it immediately or risk strange breakages. Maintaining
product compatibility between versions of CMF/Plone will become nearly
impossible.
I'm sorry, I really couldn't resist this...
neither can I ...
And that differs from other
Dammit, the tests are totally broken on the 1.6 branch. Don't people
ever run the tests? sigh
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of RD
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Zope-CMF maillist -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Dammit, the tests are totally broken on the 1.6 branch. Don't people
ever run the tests? sigh
Automatic nightly tests should be running every day I guess to avoid
this kind of problems.
Florent, running CMF tests is not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ok, I can add automatic nightly tests of CMF every night and send a mail
on the zope-tests mailing list so that the summarizer will take them
into account.
Is it fine with everybody ?
J.
Julien Anguenot wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 00:37:47 -0800, Chris Withers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alec Mitchell wrote:
to start using it immediately or risk strange breakages. Maintaining
product compatibility between versions of CMF/Plone will become nearly
impossible.
I'm sorry, I really couldn't resist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Julien Anguenot wrote:
ok, I can add automatic nightly tests of CMF every night and send a mail
on the zope-tests mailing list so that the summarizer will take them
into account.
Is it fine with everybody ?
+1.
Tres.
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tres Seaver wrote:
Julien Anguenot wrote:
ok, I can add automatic nightly tests of CMF every night and send a mail
on the zope-tests mailing list so that the summarizer will take them
into account.
Is it fine with everybody ?
Note that the
Alexander Limi wrote:
And that differs from other Plone releases how exactly? ;-)
And what, exactly, have you done to help Plone have less bugs?
*sigh* there's not a lot I can do, the problems with Plone are cultural.
There seems to be a pervasive culture of monkey patching and
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 05:49:46 -0800, Chris Withers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip rant /
Rant accepted, and understood. Still, you could try to help out instead of
*just* bitching. I am an expert bitcher myself, but at least I do
something about it. Thread closed? Feel free to follow up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tres Seaver wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
Julien Anguenot wrote:
ok, I can add automatic nightly tests of CMF every night and send a mail
on the zope-tests mailing list so that the summarizer will take them
into account.
Is it fine with everybody
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Guys,
I'll ask that this end here on the zope-cmf list (well, Alex is entitled
to one public rebuttal, I guess). We need to focus the list's
discussion and attention on ways to improve the architecture, rather
than engaging in a your code is crap
Tres Seaver wrote:
Note that the current breakage on the 1.6 branch is the kind of stuff
that made me reluctant to borrow the trunk's CMFSetup/GenericSetup. In
this case, it isn't really fair to complain about the test breakage, in
that the whole point of the branch is to find and fix such
Is uninstalling part of the use cases that GenericSetup tries to
handle?
How would one go about registering what has to be done to remove an
extension profile for instance?
Has anybody worked in that direction?
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of RD
+33 1 40 33
Answering my own question and cc'ing Vinay in since I was also talking
to him about this...
Chris Withers wrote:
I'm unit testing something which does some logging. It's supposed to
log, so ideally I'd like to test for that, but I'd also like to not have
the log spew showing during tests
Howdy CMFers,
So, Sidnei has been plugging away at the AT reindexes things an obscene
number of times issue today, and appears to have fixed many of the AT
triggered indexing redundancies. There are however still a few places in
CMF where some cataloging redundancy might be avoided. One
Please forward this to the Plone Setup list, which deals with installation
and migration of Plone. The CMF team does not have the capacity to field
Plone questions, nor should they have to. ;)
http://plone.org/contact#setup
-- Alexander Limi
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 14:08:55 -0800, Steve
20 matches
Mail list logo
