The following supporters have open issues assigned to them in this collector
(http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF).
Assigned and Open
jens
- Discussion replies removal,
[Accepted] http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/391
mhammond
- Windows DevelopmentMode penalty in
Hi Tres!
Tres Seaver wrote:
I'd like to review the current status of a number of the CMF 2.0 roadmap
items, and ask for feedback from the community on how they fit into a
near-term release of a beta for CMF 2.0. In fact, I would like to
release an alpha this weekend, followed by a more-or-less
On 1/12/06, yuppie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for dropping Zope 2.8 support
On that, it can be mentioned that for the fiveactions tool, having
both 2.8 and 2.9 support requires quite some work and code
duplication, so I'm +N on dropping 2.8, where N is an arbitrarily
large positive number. :)
On 12 Jan 2006, at 12:44, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On 1/12/06, yuppie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for dropping Zope 2.8 support
On that, it can be mentioned that for the fiveactions tool, having
both 2.8 and 2.9 support requires quite some work and code
duplication, so I'm +N on dropping 2.8,
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
As far as the Zope target platform for CMF 2.0 goes, I was under the
impression it had already quietly slipped to 2.9, even though there was
never any announcement ;) Plone will probably be on CMF 1.5/1.6 in the
near term rather than 2.0, so IMHO that is an argument
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:42:08 -, Tres Seaver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
First, many thanks to all who have contributed toe the CMF 2.0 effort!
I'd like to review the current status of a number of the CMF 2.0 roadmap
items, and ask for feedback
On 12 Jan 2006, at 22:10, Martin Aspeli wrote:
The only thing that bothers me is the lack of local skin
customisations. Does that mean that there is *no* way to e.g.
overide document_view.pt or whatever else? Or just no TTW way? In
fact, I'm -1 on releasing with either limitation, but I
Martin Aspeli wrote:
... Does that mean that there is *no* way to e.g. overide
document_view.pt or whatever else? Or just no TTW way?
Basically it means no TTW way. You should be able to override view
component definitions with overrides.zcml.
But regarding the TTW customization, I happen
