The following supporters have open issues assigned to them in this collector
(http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF).
Assigned and Open
efge
- CMFSetup: provide non-ascii im- and exports,
[Accepted] http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/292
jens
- Discussion replies removal,
Hi Florent!
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Is uninstalling part of the use cases that GenericSetup tries to handle?
No. The setup tool doesn't even keep track of the installed profiles. It
is just a merging tool. A snapshot represents the result of merging
extension profiles (and custom TTW
Hi!
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Alec Mitchell wrote:
So we have two full reindexes, and three metadata updates. The last
reindex appears to be there only to catch the change to 'portal_type'
in _finishConstruction. So, this final reindexObject, might safely be
changed to
The CMF developer community and Zope Corporation are pleased to
announce the release of version 1.5.5 of the Zope Content Management
Framework (CMF). This release marks the latest stable release in the
CMF 1.5 series and should be suitable for production use.
What is the CMF?
The Zope
On 4 Nov 2005, at 00:18, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
I propose cutting 1.5.5beta this Sunday (November 6th) and having a
beta phase lasting 2 weeks, mostly because I'll be in Detroit next
weekend and probably won't be able to cut a final release. The
weekend after that I'm back in Germany and
On 20 Nov 2005, at 16:06, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 4 Nov 2005, at 00:18, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
I propose cutting 1.5.5beta this Sunday (November 6th) and having
a beta phase lasting 2 weeks, mostly because I'll be in Detroit
next weekend and probably won't be able to cut a final release.
On 20 Nov 2005, at 16:24, Florent Guillaume wrote:
Florent, what are your requirements for the events changes you
wanted to see in 1.5.5 originally? I'm wondering if that's really
1.6 material now that we have a 1.6 branch? Let me know if you
want it in 1.5 and we can plan a 1.5.6 release,
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
I'm in the process of refactoring OFS to use new-style security
declarations (about time ;)), and I stumbled on something which may
or may not be a bug, I don't know, I'd like some else's opinion:
The class SimpleItem has the definition
